Cited by 6Higher Education Research StudiesRace, History, and American SocietyCritical Race Theory in Education

The Membership Intake Movement of Historically Black Greek-letter Organizations

Kimbrough, Walter M.·1997·NASPA Journal

Abstract

The author reviews the history of pledging and the recent movements for reform of this practice among historically Black fraternities and sororities. He describes the membership intake process that has been adopted and its resultant problems, and suggests that the national leadership should emphasize the founding ideals of the organizations as a means of overcoming resistance to change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2202/1949-6605.1024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimbrough, W. M.
Corresponding author
Kimbrough, Walter M.
Venue
NASPA Journal
Published
1997-04
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
229-243
ISSN
  • 0027-6014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-5455
OpenAlex
W4242026325
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
NASPA Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
organizational reform, Black Greek-letter organizations, national leadership, resistance to change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review