Cited by 50Corporate Finance and GovernanceCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFinancial Reporting and Valuation Research

Do Publicly Traded Corporations Act in the Public Interest?

Open access
Gordon, Roger H.·2003·Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy

Abstract

Models of corporate behavior normally assume that a firm acts in the interest of shareholders, and that shareholders care only about the returns they receive on the shares they own in that firm. But shareholders should also care about the effects of a manager's decisions on the value of shares they own in other firms, on the price they pay as consumers for the firm's output, on the costs they bear from pollutants emitted by the firm, on the value of the firm's bonds they own, on government tax revenue that finances public expenditures benefiting shareholders, etc. These effects are normally presumed to be of second order. This paper reexamines this presumption, argues that many of these effects are likely to be important, and explores the resulting implications for forecasted corporate behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2202/1538-0637.1013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership

    AZAR, J., SCHMALZ, M. C., & TECU, I. (2018) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12698 · Cited by 980 · see citing works

    “A long theoretical literature in industrial organization recognizes that common ownership of natural competitors by the same investors reduces incentives to compete: the benefits of competing aggressively to one firm – gains in market share – come at the expense of firms that are part of the same investors’ portfolio…”

Authors
Gordon, R. H.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Gordon, Roger H.
Venue
Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy
Published
2003-06-12
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
1538-0637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058948560
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Keywords
public interest, firm behavior, shareholder interests, shareholder value, corporate governance, stakeholder theory, pollution costs, tax revenue, corporate social responsibility, management decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review