Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 61Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Online Learning versus Simulation for Teaching Principles of Mechanical Ventilation to Nurse Practitioner Students

Corbridge, Susan J., Robinson, F. Patrick, Tiffen, Jennifer, Corbridge, Thomas C.·2010·International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship

Abstract

Patient simulation is increasingly used in the education of healthcare providers, yet few studies have compared simulation to other teaching modalities. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction between two methods of teaching the principles of mechanical ventilation to advanced practice nursing (APN) students: high-fidelity patient simulation (including face-to-face instruction) versus an online, narrated PowerPoint presentation. Twenty APN students were randomized to either the simulation or online teaching method in this pre/posttest study. Measures included a 12-item knowledge questionnaire and a 5-item satisfaction survey. Both groups had significant improvement in knowledge scores from pretest to posttest, but knowledge scores were not significantly different at posttest between groups. Student satisfaction with their learning method was significantly higher in the simulation group. Students choosing to participate in the alternative teaching method after study completion preferred the simulation to the online method.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2202/1548-923x.1976

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Corbridge, S. J., Robinson, F. P., Tiffen, J., & Corbridge, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
Article12-Article12
ISSN
1548-923X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079206271
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
mechanical ventilation, patient simulation, high-fidelity simulation, online learning, PowerPoint presentations, nurse practitioner education, advanced practice nursing, knowledge acquisition, student satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Education, Nursing, Graduate, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse Practitioners, Respiration, Artificial, Students, Nursing, Program Evaluation, Nursing Education Research, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.