The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Practitioner's Guide to Lag Order Selection For VAR Impulse Response Analysis
Abstract
It is common in empirical macroeconomics to fit vector autoregressive (VAR) models to construct estimates of impulse responses. An important preliminary step in impulse response analysis is the selection of the VAR lag order. In this paper, we compare the six lag-order selection criteria most commonly used in applied work. Our metric is the mean-squared error (MSE) of the implied pointwise impulse response estimates normalized relative to their MSE based on knowing the true lag order. Based on our simulation design we conclude that for monthly VAR models, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) tends to produce the most accurate structural and semi-structural impulse response estimates for realistic sample sizes. For quarterly VAR models, the Hannan-Quinn Criterion (HQC) appears to be the most accurate criterion with the exception of sample sizes smaller than 120, for which the Schwarz Information Criterion (SIC) is more accurate. For persistence profiles based on quarterly vector error correction models with known cointegrating vector, our results suggest that the SIC is the most accurate criterion for all realistic sample sizes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x · Cited by 14,051
Sims, C. A. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912017 · Cited by 12,727
Inside the black box: the credit channel of monetary policy transmission
Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.27 · Cited by 4,211
The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances
Blanchard, O. J., & Quah, D. (1988) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w2737 · Cited by 3,899
Technology, Employment, and the Business Cycle: Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations?
Galí, J. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.249 · Cited by 1,717
Bernanke, B. S., & Mihov, I. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555775 · Cited by 1,641
Systematic Monetary Policy and the Effects of Oil Price Shocks
Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M., Watson, M., Sims, C. A., & Friedman, B. M. (1997) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534702 · Cited by 1,592
Alternative explanations of the money-income correlation
Bernanke, B. S. (1986) · Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(86)90037-0 · Cited by 1,497
The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks: Evidence from the Flow of Funds
Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. (1996) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/2109845 · Cited by 1,208
Cited by
Estimating the effect of a gasoline tax on carbon emissions
Davis, L. W., & Kilian, L. (2011) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.1156 · Cited by 262
Self-citationPractice Prize Paper—Marketing's Profit Impact: Quantifying Online and Off-line Funnel Progression
Wiesel, T., Pauwels, K., & Arts, J. (2011) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1100.0612 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivanov, V., & Kilian, L.
- Venue
- Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2005-01-14
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1081-1826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3708
- OpenAlex
- W2118357071
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Practitioner's Guide to Lag Order Selection For VAR Impulse Response Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2202/1558-3708.1219
- The paper
- Ivanov, V., & Kilian, L. (2005). A Practitioner's Guide to Lag Order Selection For VAR Impulse Response Analysis. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.