Cited by 92Higher Education Research StudiesEducational Outcomes and InfluencesYouth Development and Social Support

Cognitive Effects of Greek Affiliation in College: Additional Evidence

Pascarella, Ernest T., Flowers, Lamont, Whitt, Elizabeth J.·2001·NASPA Journal

Abstract

Previous research published in this journal found broad-based negative effects of Greek affiliation on standardized measures of cognitive development after 1 year of college.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2202/1949-6605.1143

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pascarella, E. T., Flowers, L., & Whitt, E. J.
Venue
NASPA Journal
Published
2001-04
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
280-301
ISSN
  • 0027-6014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-5455
OpenAlex
W2043884619
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
NASPA Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
Greek life, fraternities and sororities, university students, cognitive development, academic performance, standardized test scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review