Cited by 3Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and dialogue systemsEmotion and Mood Recognition

Synthesis of listener vocalizations : towards interactive speech synthesis

Open access
Pammi, Sathish Chandra·2011·Universität des Saarlandes

Abstract

Spoken and multi-modal dialogue systems start to use listener vocalizations, such as uh-huh and mm-hm, for natural interaction. Generation of listener vocalizations is one of the major objectives of emotionally colored conversational speech synthesis. Success in this endeavor depends on the answers to three questions: Where to synthesize a listener vocalization? What meaning should be conveyed through the synthesized vocalization? And, how to realize an appropriate listener vocalization with the intended meaning? This thesis addresses the latter question. The investigation starts with proposing a three-stage approach: (i) data collection, (ii) annotation, and (iii) realization. The first stage presents a method to collect natural listener vocalizations from German and British English professional actors in a recording studio. In the second stage, we explore a methodology for annotating listener vocalizations -- meaning and behavior (form) annotation. The third stage proposes a realization strategy that uses unit selection and signal modification techniques to generate appropriate listener vocalizations upon user requests. Finally, we evaluate naturalness and appropriateness of synthesized vocalizations using perception studies. The work is implemented in the open source MARY text-to-speech framework, and it is integrated into the SEMAINE project's Sensitive Artificial Listener (SAL) demonstrator. Dialogsysteme nutzen zunehmend Horer-Vokalisierungen, wie z.B. a-ha oder mm-hm,…

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.22028/d291-26277

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on synthesized backchannels has been very limited, and off-the-shelf synthesizers typically do not have a comprehensive library of backchannels with associated meanings or useful parameters to control prosody.

    “So far, research on synthesized backchannels has been very limited (Stocksmeier et al., 2007; Pammi, 2011), and off-the-shelf synthesizers typically do not have a comprehensive library of backchannels with associated 'meanings,' or useful parameters to control the prosody either.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Pammi, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pammi, S. C.
Corresponding author
Pammi, Sathish Chandra
Venue
Universität des Saarlandes
Publisher
Universität des Saarlandes
Published
2011
OpenAlex
W1957270619
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Publications of the UdS (Saarland University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
conversational speech synthesis, emotional speech synthesis, unit selection, signal modification, naturalness evaluation, dialogue systems, perception studies, multimodal dialogue systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review