Cited by 25Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES ON ACCESSIBILITY USING AGENT-BASED SIMULATION —A CASE STUDY OF GUNMA PREFECTURE

Open access
LUO, Lichen, TRONCOSO PARADY, Giancarlos, TAKAMI, Kiyoshi, HARATA, Noboru·2019·Journal of JSCE

Abstract

The emergence of autonomous vehicles is expected to shape the urban transportation system in various ways. In this study, a large-scale agent-based disaggregate simulation model, MATSim, is employed to measure the impact of autonomous vehicles on accessibility changes. This study used disaggregate spatial data from the Gunma Prefecture Person Trip Survey as the initial travel demand input for the model. Two new autonomous transport modes, namely shared autonomous vehicle (SAV) and private autonomous vehicle (PAV), are included in the simulation, in addition to the existing human-driven private vehicles. A scenario analysis is conducted using fleet size of SAV, ownership of PAV, operation cost, value of time changes as the key variables in the scenario setting. Based on the final travel demand results, a Hansen-type accessibility analysis is conducted, providing quantitative evidence to measure the potential impact of autonomous vehicles on accessibility changes in Japanese regional cities. Results suggest a considerable market share of AVs in scenarios with positive assumptions, and an overall accessibility increase in the scenario where PAVs were introduced. Particularly, suburban areas seemed to enjoy more accessibility gains, which might result in further urban sprawl in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2208/journalofjsce.7.1_100

Cites

29 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 12) Gucwa, M. : Mobility and energy impact of automated cars, Proceedings of the Automated Vehicles Symposium, San Francisco, 2014.
  2. 19) Horni, A., Nagel, K. and Axhausen, K. W. (Eds.) : The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim, London: Ubiquity Press, 2016.
  3. 39) Ciari, F., Balmer, M. and Axhausen, K. W. : A new mode choice model for a multi-agent transport simulation, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs-und Raumplanung, Vol. 529, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
LUO, L., TRONCOSO PARADY, G., TAKAMI, K., & HARATA, N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Dept. of Urban Eng., The University of Tokyo
Venue
Journal of JSCE
Published
2019
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
100-111
ISSN
2187-5103 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962769664
Cited by
24
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of JSCE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, accessibility (transport and spatial geography), shared autonomous vehicles, MATSim, agent-based modeling, travel demand, value of time, fleet size, urban sprawl, regional cities, Gunma Prefecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review