The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benign Predominantly Solid Thyroid Nodules: Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Control Condition
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of benign predominantly solid thyroid nodules by comparing the findings in treatment and control groups. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with normal thyroid function, each with a benign predominantly (> 50%) solid thyroid nodule causing pressure symptoms or cosmetic problems, were assigned to a control group (n = 15) or to a group undergoing a single session of radiofrequency ablation (n = 15). Thyroid nodule volume, thyroid function, pressure symptoms, and cosmetic concerns were evaluated before treatment and during follow-up. Sonographically guided radiofrequency ablation was performed with an internally cooled electrode (1-cm active tip) with an output power of 30-80 W. RESULTS: The control group had no resolution of symptoms or cosmetic problems. The mean nodule volume increased slightly after 6 months but without statistical significance (p = 0.46). In the radiofrequency ablation group, the mean symptom score (p = 0.001) and cosmetic grade (p = 0.001) improved significantly. Mean nodule volume decreased significantly from 7.5 +/- 4.9 mL (range, 1.7-20.0 mL) to 1.3 +/- 0.8 mL (range, 0.2-2.6 mL) 6 months after radiofrequency ablation (p = 0.001). There were no major complications of ablation. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that radiofrequency ablation is effective for reducing nodule volume and relieving nodule-related clinical problems and that an effect due to spontaneous nodule reduction can be excluded owing to the results of the comparison with a similar control group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Low Serum Thyrotropin Concentrations as a Risk Factor for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Persons
Sawin, C. T., Geller, A., Wolf, P. A., Belanger, A. J., Baker, E., Bacharach, P., Wilson, P., Benjamin, E. J., & D'Agostino, R. B. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199411103311901 · Cited by 1,259 · cited 1×
“Long-term levothyroxine treatment, however, is contraindicated in many conditions, such as old age, menopause, cardiovascular disease, and osteoporosis [34, 40].”
Background
Cited by
Na, D. G., Lee, J. H., Jung, S. L., Kim, J.-H., Sung, J. Y., Shin, J. H., Kim, E.-K., Lee, J. H., Kim, D. W., Park, J. S., et al. (2012) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.117 · Cited by 337
Self-citationRadiofrequency Ablation for Autonomously Functioning Thyroid Nodules: A Multicenter Study
Sung, J. Y., Baek, J. H., Jung, S. L., Kim, J.-H., Kim, K. S., Lee, D., Kim, W. B., & Na, D. G. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0100 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baek, J. H., Kim, Y. S., Lee, D., Huh, J. Y., & Lee, J. H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 194
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1137-1142
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W1991718463
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benign Predominantly Solid Thyroid Nodules: Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Control Condition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.09.3372
- The paper
- Baek, J. H., Kim, Y. S., Lee, D., Huh, J. Y., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Benign Predominantly Solid Thyroid Nodules: Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Control Condition. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.09.3372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.