Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benign Predominantly Solid Thyroid Nodules: Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Control Condition

Baek, Jung Hwan, Kim, Yoon Suk, Lee, Ducky, Huh, Jung Yin, Lee, Jeong Hyun·2010·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of benign predominantly solid thyroid nodules by comparing the findings in treatment and control groups. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with normal thyroid function, each with a benign predominantly (> 50%) solid thyroid nodule causing pressure symptoms or cosmetic problems, were assigned to a control group (n = 15) or to a group undergoing a single session of radiofrequency ablation (n = 15). Thyroid nodule volume, thyroid function, pressure symptoms, and cosmetic concerns were evaluated before treatment and during follow-up. Sonographically guided radiofrequency ablation was performed with an internally cooled electrode (1-cm active tip) with an output power of 30-80 W. RESULTS: The control group had no resolution of symptoms or cosmetic problems. The mean nodule volume increased slightly after 6 months but without statistical significance (p = 0.46). In the radiofrequency ablation group, the mean symptom score (p = 0.001) and cosmetic grade (p = 0.001) improved significantly. Mean nodule volume decreased significantly from 7.5 +/- 4.9 mL (range, 1.7-20.0 mL) to 1.3 +/- 0.8 mL (range, 0.2-2.6 mL) 6 months after radiofrequency ablation (p = 0.001). There were no major complications of ablation. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that radiofrequency ablation is effective for reducing nodule volume and relieving nodule-related clinical problems and that an effect due to spontaneous nodule reduction can be excluded owing to the results of the comparison with a similar control group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.09.3372

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Baek, J. H., Kim, Y. S., Lee, D., Huh, J. Y., & Lee, J. H.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
2010-04
Volume
194
Issue
4
Pages
1137-1142
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W1991718463
Cited by
313
References
1
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benign Predominantly Solid Thyroid Nodules: Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Control Condition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.09.3372
The paper
Baek, J. H., Kim, Y. S., Lee, D., Huh, J. Y., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Benign Predominantly Solid Thyroid Nodules: Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Control Condition. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.09.3372

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.