The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study
Abstract
The classification of breast parenchymal patterns (N1, P1, P2, DY) and the percentage of the breast containing radiographic densities are two highly correlated radiographic measures proposed as predictors of the risk of breast cancer. In this case-control study, 160 cases of breast cancer and 160 matched controls from a mammography referral practice were compared to determine the risk of breast cancer associated with each of these two radiographic measures. The mammographic densities were quantified on caudal projections by means of a compensating polar planimeter. A relative risk estimate of 3.3 (p less than .05) was associated with the P2 + DY patterns compared with the N1 + P1 patterns. Significantly elevated risks of 4.3 to 5.5 also were observed among women whose breasts contained at least 25% mammographic densities, compared with women with less than 25% involvement. These radiographic measures tended to be more predictive of the risk of breast cancer in black women than in white women. Although the precise clinical roles of breast parenchymal patterns and densities have not been defined fully, the results of this study suggest that they are useful in the recognition of women at high risk of breast cancer. We make no claims that the findings of this study are sufficiently developed to be used as a basis for screening strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods.
Mayer, L. S., Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Morgenstern, H. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288427 · Cited by 2,905
Plackett, R. L., & Cox, D. R. (1971) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344247 · Cited by 2,264
Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer
Wolfe, J. (1976) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130 · Cited by 916
Self-citationLactation and reproductive histories of breast cancer patients in greater athens, 1965–67
Valaoras, V. G., Macmahon, B., Trichopoulos, D., & Polychronopoulou, A. (1969) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910040312 · Cited by 173
A computer program for the analysis of matched case-control studies
Lubin, J. H. (1981) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1016/0010-4809(81)90031-8 · Cited by 99
A prospective study of mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer
Gravelle, I. H., Bulstrode, J. C., Bulbrook, R. D., Wang, D. Y., Allen, D., & Hayward, J. L. (1986) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/0007-1285-59-701-487 · Cited by 42
Cited by
Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer
Boyd, N. F., Rommens, J. M., Vogt, K., Lee, V., Hopper, J. L., Yaffe, M. J., & Paterson, A. D. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70390-9 · Cited by 613
The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities
Byng, J. W., Boyd, N. F., Fishell, E., Jong, R. A., & Yaffe, M. J. (1994) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/39/10/008 · Cited by 607
Tice, J. A., Cummings, S. R., Smith-Bindman, R., Ichikawa, L., Barlow, W. E., & Kerlikowske, K. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00004 · Cited by 537
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density
Greendale, G. A., Reboussin, B. A., Slone, S., Wasilauskas, C., Pike, M. C., & Ursin, G. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/95.1.30 · Cited by 419
Santen, R. J., & Mansel, R. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra035692 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfe, J., Saftlas, A., & Salane, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1987-06-01
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1087-1092
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2089352475
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.148.6.1087
- The paper
- Wolfe, J., Saftlas, A., & Salane, M. (1987). Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.148.6.1087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.