The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Postmenopausal hormone use is associated with an increase in mammographic density, but the magnitude of the density increase is unknown. METHODS: Baseline and 12-month mammograms were obtained for 571 (65%) of the 875 women, aged 45-64 years, who were enrolled in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial and randomly assigned to receive placebo, daily conjugated equine estrogens at 0.625 mg/day (CEE), daily CEE and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) at 10 mg/day on days 1-12 (CEE+MPA-cyclic), daily CEE and MPA at 2.5 mg/day (CEE+MPA-continuous), or daily CEE and micronized progesterone (MP) at 200 mg/day on days 1-12 (CEE+MP). We analyzed digitized mammograms to determine the percentage of the left breast that was composed of dense tissue (i.e., mammographic percent density). Linear regression analysis was used to examine the effects of treatments on the change in mammographic percent density between baseline and 12 months, before and after adjustment for possible confounders. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The adjusted absolute mean changes in mammographic percent density over 12 months were 4.76% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.29% to 6.23%), 4.58% (95% CI = 3.19% to 5.97%), and 3.08% (95% CI = 1.65% to 4.51%) for women in the CEE+MPA-cyclic, CEE+MPA-continuous, and CEE-MP groups, respectively. Each of those absolute mean changes was statistically significantly different from the adjusted absolute mean change in mammographic percent density for women in the placebo group, which was -0.07% (95% CI = -1.50% to 1.38%). CONCLUSION: Greater mammographic density was associated with the use of estrogen/progestin combination therapy, regardless of how the progestin was given, but not with the use of estrogen only.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valery (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520270033028 · Cited by 2,320
Cited by
Fournier, A., Berrino, F., & Clavel-Chapelon, F. (2007) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9523-x · Cited by 693
Breast Tissue Composition and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer
Boyd, N. F., Martin, L. J., Bronskill, M., Yaffe, M. J., Duric, N., & Minkin, S. (2010) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djq239 · Cited by 478
Tamoxifen and Breast Density in Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer
Cuzick, J., Warwick, J., Pinney, E., Warren, R. M. L., & Duffy, S. W. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh106 · Cited by 329
An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer
Nazari, S. S., & Mukherjee, P. (2018) · Breast Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12282-018-0857-5 · Cited by 298
Tamimi, R. M., Byrne, C., Colditz, G. A., & Hankinson, S. E. (2007) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djm062 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Greendale, G. A., Reboussin, B. A., Slone, S., Wasilauskas, C., Pike, M. C., & Ursin, G.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-37
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W1997655151
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/95.1.30
- The paper
- Greendale, G. A., Reboussin, B. A., Slone, S., Wasilauskas, C., Pike, M. C., & Ursin, G. (2003). Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/95.1.30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.