Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Serial CT in fibrosing alveolitis: prognostic significance of the initial pattern.

Wells, A U, Rubens, M B, du Bois, R M, Hansell, D M·1993·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients with fibrosing alveolitis, a reticular pattern on CT scans of the lungs correlates with histologic findings of fibrosis, whereas a ground-glass pattern has been reported to correlate with reversible inflammatory disease. The majority of patients with fibrosing alveolitis have a ground-glass component visible on CT scans, but response to therapy is infrequent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the relative extents of ground-glass and reticular patterns by analyzing serial changes in these CT appearances. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Serial CT scans were analyzed in 56 patients (21 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and 35 with fibrosing alveolitis associated with systemic sclerosis). The relative extents of ground-glass and reticular patterns were assessed on the initial CT scan. Overall extent of abnormal lung and distribution of disease on initial CT scans were also categorized. Changes in extent and appearance of disease were evaluated in paired anatomically comparable CT sections and assessed independently by two observers; the median interval between scans was 16 months. Serial changes on CT were examined in relation to the initial pattern, extent, and distribution of disease seen on CT scans and in relation to trends in results of concurrent pulmonary function tests. RESULTS: Changes in the extent of disease were due to regression of a ground-glass pattern in 18 patients, an increase in a reticular pattern in nine patients, and an increase in a ground-glass pattern in five patients. A reticular pattern did not regress in any patient. In treated patients, diminution in extent of disease, shown as regression of a ground-glass pattern, was seen most frequently when a ground-glass pattern was the most extensive abnormality at initial scanning (p < .002), independent of extent or distribution of disease seen on CT scans and the type of fibrosing alveolitis. When a ground-glass pattern was associated with an equally extensive reticular pattern, the extent of disease diminished with therapy in a minority of patients (5/13). Improvement in results of pulmonary function tests was associated with regression of a ground-glass pattern in the majority of patients (8/11). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the prognostic significance of a ground-glass pattern depends on the extent of an associated reticular pattern and is independent of the extent and distribution of disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.161.6.8249719

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Wells, A. U., Rubens, M. B., du Bois, R. M., & Hansell, D. M.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1993-12
Volume
161
Issue
6
Pages
1159-1165
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2023466198
Cited by
212
References
0
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serial CT in fibrosing alveolitis: prognostic significance of the initial pattern. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.161.6.8249719
The paper
Wells, A. U., Rubens, M. B., du Bois, R. M., & Hansell, D. M. (1993). Serial CT in fibrosing alveolitis: prognostic significance of the initial pattern. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.161.6.8249719

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.