The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Staging of esophageal cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the performance of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the staging of cancer in patients with esophageal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The findings of FDG PET and of CT in the chest and upper abdomen of 36 patients with newly diagnosed esophageal carcinoma were compared with pathologic findings obtained either during a curative surgical procedure with tissue sampling (n = 29) or by tissue sampling alone (n = 7). RESULTS: Abnormal FDG uptake was identified on PET in the esophageal tumors of all patients. In 29 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy, PET and CT accurately revealed the extent of nodal disease in 76% (22/29) and 45% (13/29) of patients, respectively. In the seven patients who underwent tissue sampling instead of complete esophagectomy, PET revealed metastatic disease in five patients, all of whom avoided needless surgery. CT failed to reveal metastatic disease in these five patients. In addition, PET incidentally revealed an unsuspected primary long carcinoma in one patient. CONCLUSION: FDG PET is more sensitive than CT for revealing regional and distant metastases in patients with esophageal carcinoma. The use of PET in the staging of esophageal cancer may prove to be cost-effective by decreasing the number of unnecessary surgeries in patients with unresectable tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 943
Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
van Vliet, E. P. M., Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H., Hunink, M. G. M., Kuipers, E. J., & Siersema, P. D. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604200 · Cited by 517
Blodgett, T. M., Meltzer, C. C., & Townsend, D. W. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2422051113 · Cited by 387
FDG PET Evaluation of Mucinous Neoplasms: Correlation of FDG Uptake with Histopathologic Features
Berger, K. L., Nicholson, S. A., Dehdashti, F., & Siegel, B. A. (2000) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741005 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Flanagan, F. L., Dehdashti, F., Siegel, B. A., Trask, D. D., Sundaresan, S. R., Patterson, G. A., & Cooper, J. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 417-424
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2040481562
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staging of esophageal cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016218
- The paper
- Flanagan, F. L., Dehdashti, F., Siegel, B. A., Trask, D. D., Sundaresan, S. R., Patterson, G. A., & Cooper, J. D. (1997). Staging of esophageal cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.