The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the criteria for unresectability of major peripancreatic vessels in patients with pancreatic carcinoma as revealed by optimally enhanced, pancreatic-phase thin-section helical CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent local dissection during curative or palliative surgery also underwent preoperative pancreatic-phase thin-section helical CT (40- to 70-sec delay, 2.5- to 3-mm collimation). Tumor involvement of the portal and superior mesenteric veins and the celiac, hepatic, and superior mesenteric arteries was prospectively graded on a 0-4 scale based on circumferential contiguity of tumor to vessel. Subsequent surgical results were then correlated with the CT grades. RESULTS: At surgery, definitive evaluation was possible for 80 vessels. Forty-eight of 48 vessels graded 0 and three of three vessels graded 1 were resectable. Four of seven vessels graded 2, seven of eight vessels graded 3, and 14 of 14 vessels graded 4 were unresectable. A threshold of between grades 2 and 3, which corresponded to tumor involvement of one-half circumference of the vessel, yielded the lowest number of false-negatives and an acceptable number of false-positives for unresectability. Such a threshold would have yielded a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 95%, and a negative predictive value of 93% for unresectability of the vessels studied. CONCLUSION: A grading system for tumor involvement of the major vessels in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be based on the degree of circumferential contiguity of tumor to vessel. Involvement of vessel to tumor that exceeds one-half circumference of the vessel is highly specific for unresectable tumor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kamisawa, T., Wood, L. D., Itoi, T., & Takaori, K. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00141-0 · Cited by 2,212
Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A state-of-the-art review
Lee, E. S. (2014) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7864 · Cited by 401
Isoattenuating Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at Multi–Detector Row CT: Secondary Signs
Prokesch, R. W., Chow, L. C., Beaulieu, C. F., Bammer, R., & Jeffrey, R. B. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2243011284 · Cited by 337
Golcher, H., Brunner, T. B., Witzigmann, H., Marti, L., Bechstein, W.-O., Bruns, C., Jungnickel, H., Schreiber, S., Grabenbauer, G. G., Meyer, T., et al. (2015) · Strahlentherapie und Onkologie · doi:10.1007/s00066-014-0737-7 · Cited by 324
McNulty, N. J., Francis, I. R., Platt, J. F., Cohan, R. H., Korobkin, M., & Gebremariam, A. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl1897 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, D. S., Reber, H. A., Krasny, R. M., Kadell, B. M., & Sayre, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1439-1443
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W1980095448
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168704
- The paper
- Lu, D. S., Reber, H. A., Krasny, R. M., Kadell, B. M., & Sayre, J. (1997). Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.