The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pulmonary mucormycosis: radiologic findings in 32 cases.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the radiologic manifestations of pulmonary mucormycosis with clinical and pathologic correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records, pathology reports, chest radiographs, and CT scans of 32 cases of pathologically proven pulmonary mucormycosis were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The study group included 20 males and 12 females with a mean age of 47 years old. Clinical data were available for 29 patients. Signs and symptoms included fever (n = 23), cough (n = 21), bloody sputum (n = 9), dyspnea (n = 7), and chest pain (n = 6). Four patients were asymptomatic. Most patients were either immunocompromised (n = 20) or had diabetes mellitus (n = 9). Sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage cultures showed no growth in 17 of 18 cases. Diagnoses were confirmed at surgery or autopsy in all cases. Abnormalities seen on chest radiographs included lobar (n = 15) or multilobar (n = 6) consolidation, solitary (n = 7) or multiple (n = 1) masses, and solitary (n = 3) or multiple (n = 2) nodules. Cavitation was seen on chest radiographs in 13 patients, and intracavitary masses were seen in four. Associated radiographic findings included hilar (n = 3) or mediastinal (n = 3) adenopathy and unilateral (n = 6) or bilateral (n = 3) pleural effusion. CT in 19 patients revealed these significant additional findings: splenic (n = 1) or renal (n = 1) involvement, bronchial occlusion (n = 1), extrapulmonary invasion (n = 1), and pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). CONCLUSION: In our study, pulmonary mucormycosis typically was manifested in immunocompromised or diabetic patients by consolidation on chest radiographs; cavitation was seen in 40% of patients. CT revealed significant unsuspected abnormalities in 26% of patients. Definitive diagnosis required pathologic demonstration of the organism in affected tissue because cultures from our patients rarely showed growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Novel perspectives on mucormycosis: pathophysiology, presentation, and management
Spellberg, B., Edwards, J., & Ibrahim, A. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.18.3.556-569.2005 · Cited by 1,537
Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations of Mucormycosis
Petrikkos, G., Skiada, A., Lortholary, O., Roilides, E., Walsh, T. J., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir866 · Cited by 1,452
Prabhu, R. M., & Patel, R. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.00843.x · Cited by 593
Georgiadou, S. P., Sipsas, N. V., Marom, E. M., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir122 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- McAdams, H. P., Rosado de Christenson, M., Strollo, D. C., & Patz, E. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1541-1548
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W1993017088
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary mucormycosis: radiologic findings in 32 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168721
- The paper
- McAdams, H. P., Rosado de Christenson, M., Strollo, D. C., & Patz, E. F. (1997). Pulmonary mucormycosis: radiologic findings in 32 cases. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.