The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy of MRI in the Detection of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of MRI to accurately show residual primary breast malignancy in women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with locally advanced primary breast carcinoma underwent contrast-enhanced MRI before and after treatment with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. For each patient, the maximum extent of the MRI abnormality was measured both before and after treatment. These measurements were subsequently compared with physical examination findings and histologic results to determine the ability of MRI to accurately reveal tumor extent after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: MRI after chemotherapy showed a correlation coefficient of 0.75 with histology, which was better than physical examination (r = 0.61). MRI underestimated the extent of residual tumor in two patients by more than 1 cm (including one false-negative examination), was within 1 cm in 12 of 21 patients, and overestimated tumor extent by more than 1 cm in seven of 21 patients. CONCLUSION: MRI can show residual malignancy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy better than physical examination, particularly in patients who have not had a complete clinical response to therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group
Sardanelli, F., Boetes, C., Borisch, B., Decker, T., Federico, M., Gilbert, F. J., Helbich, T., Heywang-Köbrunner, S. H., Kaiser, W. A., Kerin, M. J., et al. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015 · Cited by 992
Marinovich, M. L., Houssami, N., Macaskill, P., Sardanelli, F., Irwig, L., Mamounas, E. P., von Minckwitz, G., Brennan, M. E., & Ciatto, S. (2013) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djs528 · Cited by 382
Gu, Y.-L., Pan, S.-M., Ren, J., Yang, Z.-X., & Jiang, G.-Q. (2017) · Clinical Breast Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2016.12.010 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosen, E. L., Blackwell, K. L., Baker, J. A., Soo, M. S., Bentley, R. C., Yu, D., Samulski, T. V., & Dewhirst, M. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 181
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1275-1282
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2158614431
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of MRI in the Detection of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811275
- The paper
- Rosen, E. L., Blackwell, K. L., Baker, J. A., Soo, M. S., Bentley, R. C., Yu, D., Samulski, T. V., & Dewhirst, M. W. (2003). Accuracy of MRI in the Detection of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.