N-3 Fatty Acids as Secondary Prevention against Cardiovascular Events in Patients Who Undergo Chronic Hemodialysis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Intervention Trial
Abstract
Patients who are treated with chronic hemodialysis (HD) experience premature cardiovascular disease and an increased mortality. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) may be effective in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, but the effects of n-3 PUFA has not previously been examined in HD patients. It was hypothesized that secondary prevention with n-3 PUFA would reduce the number of cardiovascular events and death in patients who are treated with chronic HD. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trial compared the effect of n-3 PUFA and a control treatment as secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in HD patients. The primary outcome was a composite of total cardiovascular events and death. A total of 206 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with n-3 PUFA or control treatment and followed for 2 yr or until reaching a predefined end point. During the trial, 121 (59%) of 206 patients reached a primary end point. N-3 PUFA had no significant effect on the primary composite end point of cardiovascular events and death (62 versus 59; NS). In the n-3 PUFA group, a significant reduction was seen in the number of myocardial infarctions (four versus 13; P = 0.036). This trial was limited by a relatively small number of patients and a large number of withdrawals. However, it is concluded that treatment with n-3 PUFA did not reduce the total number of cardiovascular events and death in this high-risk population. N-3 PUFA significantly…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three studies have examined the relationship between marine derived n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular outcomes; however, all were performed in patients on hemodialysis and used a less tailored n-3 fatty acid formulation than icosapent ethyl.
“Three studies have examined the relationship between marine derived n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular outcomes; however, all were performed in patients on hemodialysis and used a less tailored n-3 fatty acid formulation than icosapent ethyl.29–31”
From Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl Across the Range of Kidney Function in Patients With Established Cardiovascular Disease or Diabetes: REDUCE-IT RENAL (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Svensson, M., Schmidt, E. B., Jørgensen, K. A., & Christensen, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Svensson, My
- Venue
- Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 780-786
- ISSN
- 1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104516492
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Society of Nephrology
- Hjerteforeningen
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
- Keywords
- omega-3 fatty acids, maintenance hemodialysis, secondary prevention, cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, end-stage renal disease, dietary supplementation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Double-Blind Method, Female, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Male, Fatty Acids, Omega-3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review