Cited by 156Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementPalliative and Oncologic Care

Use of Hospice in the United States Dialysis Population

Murray, Anne M., Arko, Cheryl, Chen, Shu-Cheng, Gilbertson, David T., Moss, Alvin H.·2006·Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Hospice is recognized for providing excellent end-of-life care but may be underused by dialysis patients. Hospice use and related outcomes were measured among dialysis patients, and factors that were associated with hospice use were identified. The 2-yr US Renal Data System dialysis patients who died between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2002, and hospice claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were examined to measure prevalence, factors, and costs that were associated with dialysis withdrawal and hospice use. Of the 115,239 deceased patients, 21.8% withdrew from dialysis and 13.5% used hospice. Of those who withdrew, 41.9% used hospice. Failure to thrive was the most common reason for dialysis withdrawal (42.9%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors that were significantly associated with hospice referral among patients who withdrew from dialysis were age, race, reason for withdrawal, ability to walk or transfer at dialysis initiation, and state of residence. Among patients who withdrew from dialysis and used hospice, median cost of per-patient care during the last week of life was $1858, compared with $4878 for nonhospice patients (P < 0.001); hospitalization costs accounted for most of that difference. Only 22.9% of dialysis hospice patients died in the hospital, compared with 69.0% of nonhospice patients (P < 0.001). A minority of dialysis patients use hospice, even among patients who withdrew from dialysis, whose death usually is certain. Increased hospice use may enable more dialysis patients to die at home, with substantial cost savings. Research regarding additional benefits of hospice care for dialysis patients is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2215/cjn.00970306

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, A. M., Arko, C., Chen, S.-C., Gilbertson, D. T., & Moss, A. H.
Affiliations
Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
Venue
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2006-11
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
1248-1255
ISSN
1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149481791
Cited by
156
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (N01-DK-9-2343)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
hospice care, dialysis patients, end-of-life care, dialysis withdrawal, home death, hospital costs, failure to thrive, United States Renal Data System
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Costs and Cost Analysis, Female, Medicare, Hospices, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, United States, Cohort Studies, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review