Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Annual Incidence of Nephrolithiasis among Children and Adults in South Carolina from 1997 to 2012

Open access
Tasian, Gregory E., Ross, Michelle E., Song, Lihai, Sas, David J., Keren, Ron, Denburg, Michelle R., Chu, David I., Copelovitch, Lawrence, Saigal, Christopher S., Furth, Susan L.·2016·Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of nephrolithiasis in the United States has increased substantially, but recent changes in incidence with respect to age, sex, and race are not well characterized. This study examined temporal trends in the annual incidence and cumulative risk of nephrolithiasis among children and adults living in South Carolina over a 16-year period. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a population-based, repeated cross-sectional study using the US Census and South Carolina Medical Encounter data, which capture all emergency department visits, surgeries, and admissions in the state. The annual incidence of nephrolithiasis in South Carolina from 1997 to 2012 was estimated, and linear mixed models were used to estimate incidence rate ratios for age, sex, and racial groups. The cumulative risk of nephrolithiasis during childhood and over the lifetime was estimated for males and females in 1997 and 2012. RESULTS: Among an at-risk population of 4,625,364 people, 152,925 unique patients received emergency, inpatient, or surgical care for nephrolithiasis. Between 1997 and 2012, the mean annual incidence of nephrolithiasis increased 1% annually from 206 to 239 per 100,000 persons. Among age groups, the greatest increase was observed among 15-19 year olds, in whom incidence increased 26% per 5 years (incidence rate ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 1.29). Adjusting for age and race, incidence increased 15% per 5 years among females (incidence rate ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.16) but remained stable for males. The incidence among blacks increased 15% more per 5 years compared with whites (incidence rate ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.17). These changes in incidence resulted in doubling of the risk of nephrolithiasis during childhood and a 45% increase in the lifetime risk of nephrolithiasis for women over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of kidney stones has increased among young patients, particularly women, and blacks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2215/cjn.07610715

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Tasian, G. E., Ross, M. E., Song, L., Sas, D. J., Keren, R., Denburg, M. R., Chu, D. I., Copelovitch, L., Saigal, C. S., & Furth, S. L.
Venue
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2016-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
488-496
ISSN
1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2235346569
Cited by
257
References
37
FWCI
23.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annual Incidence of Nephrolithiasis among Children and Adults in South Carolina from 1997 to 2012. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2215/cjn.07610715
The paper
Tasian, G. E., Ross, M. E., Song, L., Sas, D. J., Keren, R., Denburg, M. R., Chu, D. I., Copelovitch, L., Saigal, C. S., & Furth, S. L. (2016). Annual Incidence of Nephrolithiasis among Children and Adults in South Carolina from 1997 to 2012. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.07610715

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.