Cited by 47Retinal Imaging and AnalysisDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

Developing retinal biomarkers of neurological disease: an analytical perspective

Open access
MacCormick, Ian JC, Czanner, Gabriela, Faragher, Brian·2015·Biomarkers in Medicine

Abstract

The inaccessibility of the brain poses a problem for neuroscience. Scientists have traditionally responded by developing biomarkers for brain physiology and disease. The retina is an attractive source of biomarkers since it shares many features with the brain. Some even describe the retina as a 'window' to the brain, implying that retinal signs are analogous to brain disease features. However, new analytical methods are needed to show whether or not retinal signs really are equivalent to brain abnormalities, since this requires greater evidence than direct associations between retina and brain. We, therefore propose a new way to think about, and test, how clearly one might see the brain through the retinal window, using cerebral malaria as a case study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/bmm.15.17

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Dowling JE The Retina: An Approachable Part Of The Brain 1992 Belknap Press London, UK 2nd Edition
  2. [17]Burzykowski T Molenberghs G Buyse M The Evaluation of Surrogate End Points 1998 Springer NY, USA 1st Edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacCormick, I. J., Czanner, G., & Faragher, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
MacCormick, Ian JC
Venue
Biomarkers in Medicine
Published
2015-07
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
691-701
ISSN
  • 1752-0363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0371
OpenAlex
W2191829633
Cited by
47
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomarkers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Wellcome Trust ((grant number 092668/Z/10/Z; core grant number 084679/Z/08/Z))
  • Clinical Eye Research Centre, St. Paul’s Eye Unit
  • Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
retinal biomarkers, cerebral malaria, neurological disorders, retinal imaging, brain disease diagnosis
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Diseases, Humans, Retina, Biomarkers, Malaria, Cerebral

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review