Cited by 10Fatty Acid Research and HealthInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Treatment with w-3 fatty acids reduces serum C-reactive protein concentration

Muhammad, Kamran, Morledge, Thomas, Sachar, Ravish, Zeldin, Annette, Wolski, Kathy, Bhatt, Deepak·2011·Clinical Lipidology

Abstract

Background: Studies have demonstrated that patients with diets high in w-3 fatty acids have a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events. C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation, is a strong predictor of future cardiovascular events. w-3 fatty acids have been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties. However, there is a paucity of data examining the effect of =-3 fatty acids on CRP levels. This randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial tested the hypothesis that treatment with w-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) would reduce serum high-sensitivity CRP levels. Materials & methods: Fifty three patients with elevated baseline CRP (?3 mg/l) were randomized to n-3 PUFA (27 patients) or placebo (26 patients). Patients with active infection, inflammatory disease, baseline CRP ?10 mg/l or those started on HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy during the study period were excluded. The primary end point was CRP level following 8 weeks of treatment. Results: After 8 weeks of treatment with the study drug, the median CRP level in the n-3 PUFA group was 3.4 mg/l compared with 4.0 mg/l in the placebo group (p = 0.36). After controlling for baseline CRP, there was a significant percentage decrease in CRP from baseline in the n-3 PUFA group (-40.3%; p = 0.009) but not in the placebo group (-16.4%; p = 0.32) Conclusion: Treatment for 8 weeks with w-3 fatty acids resulted in a significant percentage reduction of CRP levels as compared with baseline, a finding not seen with placebo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/clp.11.54

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies administering higher-dose EPA suggest additional beneficial effects beyond lipid-lowering that may be unique to EPA relative to other TG-lowering therapies, such as beneficial changes in coronary plaque characteristics, which may lead to reductions in major CV events.

    “Finally, studies administering higher‐dose EPA suggest additional beneficial effects beyond lipid‐lowering that may be unique to EPA relative to other TG‐lowering therapies, such as beneficial changes in coronary plaque characteristics, which may lead to reductions in major CV events.4, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muhammad, K., Morledge, T., Sachar, R., Zeldin, A., Wolski, K., & Bhatt, D.
Affiliations
  • Oklahoma Heart Institute (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • WakeMed (US)
Corresponding author
Bhatt, Deepak
Venue
Clinical Lipidology
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
723-729
ISSN
  • 1758-4299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-4302
OpenAlex
W2135871003
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Lipidology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Amarin Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, C-reactive protein, high-sensitivity CRP, inflammation, cardiovascular risk, anti-inflammatory activity, dietary supplementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review