Cited by 28Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Active human nucleolar organizer regions are interspersed with inactive rDNA repeats in normal and tumor cells

Open access
Zillner, Karina, Komatsu, Jun, Filarsky, Katharina, Kalepu, Rajakiran, Bensimon, Aaron, Németh, Attila·2015·Epigenomics

Abstract

Aim The synthesis of rRNA is a key determinant of normal and malignant cell growth and subject to epigenetic regulation. Yet, the epigenomic features of rDNA arrays clustered in nucleolar organizer regions are largely unknown. We set out to explore for the first time how DNA methylation is distributed on individual rDNA arrays. Materials & methods Here we combined immunofluorescence detection of DNA modifications with fluorescence hybridization of single DNA fibers, metaphase immuno-FISH and methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestions followed by Southern blot. Results We found clustering of both hypomethylated and hypermethylated repeat units and hypermethylation of noncanonical rDNA in IMR90 fibroblasts and HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells. Surprisingly, we also found transitions between hypo- and hypermethylated rDNA repeat clusters on single DNA fibers. Conclusion Collectively, our analyses revealed co-existence of different epialleles on individual nucleolar organizer regions and showed that epi-combing is a valuable approach to analyze epigenomic patterns of repetitive DNA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/epi.14.93

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zillner, K., Komatsu, J., Filarsky, K., Kalepu, R., Bensimon, A., & Németh, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Genomic Vision (France) (FR)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Venue
Epigenomics
Published
2015-06
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
363-378
ISSN
  • 1750-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-192X
OpenAlex
W1908715577
Cited by
28
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Epigenomics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB960)
  • Bavarian Elite Network
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
nucleolar organizer regions, rDNA repeats, DNA methylation, epigenetic regulation, ribosomal RNA synthesis, epialleles, colorectal cancer, fibroblasts
MeSH terms
DNA, Ribosomal, Female, Humans, Male, Nucleolus Organizer Region, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Genome, Human, DNA Methylation, Genes, rRNA, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review