Cited by 146Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanoparticle Transport Across the Placental Barrier: Pushing the Field Forward!

Open access
Muoth, Carina, Aengenheister, Leonie, Kucki, Melanie, Wick, Peter, Buerki-Thurnherr, Tina·2016·Nanomedicine

Abstract

The human placenta is a multifunctional organ constituting the barrier between maternal and fetal tissues. Nanoparticles can cross the placental barrier, and there is increasing evidence that the extent of transfer is dependent on particle characteristics and functionalization. While translocated particles may pose risks to the growing fetus particles may also be engineered to enable new particle-based therapies in pregnancy. In both cases, a comprehensive understanding of nanoparticle uptake, accumulation and translocation is indispensable and requires predictive placental transfer models. We examine and evaluate the current literature to draw first conclusions on the possibility to steer translocation of nanoparticles. In addition, we discuss if current placental models are suitable for nanoparticle transfer studies and suggest strategies to improve their predictability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/nnm-2015-0012

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mitrano D Renville J Neubauer K Thomas R . Field-flow fractionation coupled with ICP-MS for the analysis of engineered nanoparticles in environmental samples. Lc Gc Europe25 (12), 652 (2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 146

Metadata

Authors
Muoth, C., Aengenheister, L., Kucki, M., Wick, P., & Buerki-Thurnherr, T.
Affiliations
  • Empa (CH)
  • Empa–Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science & Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Venue
Nanomedicine
Published
2016-03-16
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
941-957
ISSN
  • 1743-5889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-6963
OpenAlex
W2301631169
Cited by
146
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Nanomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Graphene Flagship
  • European Commission
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
nanoparticle transport, placental barrier, nanoparticle functionalization, particle properties, prenatal exposure, prediction model
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Female, Humans, Placenta, Pregnancy, Nanotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review