Cited by 51Ethics and bioethics in healthcareMedicine, History, and PhilosophyNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Personhood and Solidarity: What Kind of Personalized Medicine Do We Want?

Open access
Prainsack, Barbara·2014·Personalized Medicine

Abstract

The concept of personalized medicine has attracted considerable criticism over recent years. Only a few studies, however, have questioned the meaning of the notion of the 'person' in this context. By leaving the meaning of this word unexplored, we risk taking on board two assumptions that are inherent in contemporary western thinking: first, that social practice can be reduced to decisions of individuals; and second, that people's actions are normally motivated by self-interest. Both assumptions are problematic in the context of medicine. One of the keys to realizing a form of personalization in medicine that fosters solidarity and is sensitive to people's needs lies in being cautious about what idea of personhood we use and promote.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/pme.14.49

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Prainsack, B.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Prainsack, Barbara
Venue
Personalized Medicine
Published
2014-09
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
651-657
ISSN
  • 1741-0541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-828X
OpenAlex
W2124174934
Cited by
51
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Personalized Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/I035854/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
personhood, solidarity, social practices, individualism, self-interest, medical ethics, patient needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review