Cited by 9Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeological Research and ProtectionColonialism, slavery, and trade

The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 8 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Field Excavations at Sylvester Manor

Open access
Hayes, Katherine Howlett·2007·Northeast Historical Archaeology

Abstract

This chapter describes the overall field strategy and summarizes nine seasons of field excavations at Sylvester Manor. All tested site areas are described, with greatest detail given to the areas relevant to the research questions on the early plantation period, as well as the pre-Contact/Colonial Native American occupation areas. This overview of the excavations also provides a broad interpretation of the results relating to the early colonial landscape, associations between site areas, and the longer term Native American occupation of the site.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This chapter summarizes nine seasons of field excavations at Sylvester Manor, describing tested site areas and initial interpretations of the early plantation, Native American occupation, and later landscape changes. It argues that the plantation core was a tightly compact working and living area that was repeatedly rebuilt and reoccupied, though many questions remain unresolved.

Key findings

  • The South Lawn was the most extensively excavated area, with over 180 square meters investigated; its A-2 midden ranged from the mid-17th to mid-18th century, and crossmended ceramic sherds were scattered as much as 10 m. A patterned quartz-cobble surface there was approximately 3.5 m wide with an intact segment about 9.5 m long, using alternating large (~12–15 cm) and small (~3–6 cm) cobbles, and is presumed to date to the earliest Sylvester settlement phase.
  • Feature 226, a likely robbed builders’ trench in the South Lawn, had approximately 6 m of length, one intact corner, and extended nearly a meter below surface; it contained shell-tempered ceramics, rolled copper beads, wampum-production waste, European goods dating to the mid-17th century, and a high volume of fish bone and scales. Feature 221 in the Southeast Lawn was a large pit with an interior portion about 4 × 4 m, at least four distinct fill layers, and faunal waste approximately 120–150 cm below surface; its mixed Native and European materials also date to the Early Plantation period.
  • On the North Peninsula, one stratified deposit had upper levels mixing Native and European materials and lower levels containing only Late Woodland period (ca. AD 1000–1550) Native ceramics and lithics; the deposit was 16–28 cm thick. Later work there identified two dense shell deposits approximately 1.5 m wide with pre-Contact Windsor Brushed tradition ceramics and nutshells for radiocarbon dating.
  • The North Lawn produced a mortared stone foundation with a brick floor interpreted as a dairy, later confirmed by an 1828 dower dispute map; the South Entrance yielded the least cultural material and no features, with many sterile test pits.

Methods

  • Fieldwork began in 1998 with 50 × 50 cm shovel test pits on a 10 m grid, followed by intensive excavations in 6 × 6 m gridded blocks divided into nine 2 × 2 m open units; units were excavated by observable stratigraphic layers with arbitrary 5 cm levels within layers.
  • All sediments were screened through 1/4" or 1/8" mesh, and the sampling protocol called for a minimum 2 L flotation sample and a 50 ml geochemical sample per stratigraphic/arbitrary context.
  • The chapter summarizes nine seasons of excavation across multiple site areas, including the West Peninsula, West/Southwest Lawn, North Lawn, Melon Patch, South Entrance, North Peninsula, South Lawn, and Southeast Lawn; analysis draws on field findings, geophysical testing, documentary maps, and some detailed artifact analyses, though much material identification comes from a general catalog.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: because of the tremendous volume of recovered artifacts, much material identification is drawn from a general catalog, and more specific identifications are unavailable unless otherwise noted. The A-2 midden was disturbed and mixed, so artifacts can only be regarded in the aggregate, making positive associations with particular people or activities difficult.
  • Stated in the paper: many interpretations are initial and ongoing analysis may refine, enrich, or scrap them; the specific placement and function of plantation-phase structures remained elusive, and no chimney base was located in the core area.
  • Evident from the text: some results, such as those from the west lawn, are described as ambiguous and not clearly related to primary research questions; the conclusion says eight seasons of excavation while the chapter introduction says nine, an internal inconsistency in the text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22191/neha/vol36/iss1/5

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 90 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 79
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
87 of 87
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Much of the stone and sand fill matrix in the North Lawn is cellar excavate.

    “Much of the stone and sand fill matrix is presumed to be cellar excavate.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Sylvesters would prefer to live at some distance from the working areas.

    “assuming that they would prefer to live at some distance from the working areas.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Excavation seasons counted as both nine and eight

    Minor

    The chapter summary says it covers nine seasons of field excavations, but the discussion calls them eight seasons.

  • Utility pipes identified as both iron and lead

    Minor

    The text describes the pipes as iron, one of them galvanized, while Table 1 identifies the two pipes as lead and iron.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. M.A. thesis, University of Massachusetts Boston.
  2. M.A. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Boston.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Hayes, K. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Hayes, Katherine Howlett
Venue
Northeast Historical Archaeology
Published
2007
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
34-50
ISSN
0048-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W203060916
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Northeast Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • The Open Repository - Binghamton (Binghamton University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Massachusetts Boston
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
Keywords
plantation archaeology, colonial North Carolina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review