Cited by 6Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Similarity Measure of Images using SIFT and ORB Feature Matching

Open access
Singh, Shivani, Siramdas, Sahithya, Tanmayi, K., Koli, Laxmi·2022·International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, similarities between images are identified and examined. A collection of images made from an image of the same scene or item taken under varied atmospheric conditions, such as different perspectives or lighting settings, and then altered in myriad ways by the very same starting image. The process of determining picture similarity is comparing visual information to evaluate how similar it is. Based on the input, it finds good matches and presents the proportion percent exceptional matches between the photos. It compares the supplied input to calculate the similarity measure. For decades, picture resemblance has been a fundamental problem in the fields of object recognition.When two photos are compared, Image Similarity generates a result that represents how physically similar they are. The measure of comparison of the two photographs is given a numerical number in this test. The similarity score between two photos ranges from 0 to 1 respectively.We have proposed a solution using SIFT & ORB Feature Matching

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22214/ijraset.2022.44319

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jian Zhao,Yiliu Feng, Shandong Yuan, Wan Zheng Cai, "A more brief and efficient SIFT image matching algorithm for computer vision", in IEEE International Conference.
  2. Patil J.S., Pradeepini G., "SIFT: A comprehensive", in International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering,2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Singh, S., Siramdas, S., Tanmayi, K., & Koli, L.
Venue
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2022-06-30
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
2354-2359
ISSN
2321-9653 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283371682
Cited by
5
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
image similarity, SIFT, ORB, feature matching, object recognition, image matching, similarity scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review