Augmented Reality for teaching science: Students’ problem solving skill, motivation, and learning outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Besides learning outcomes, motivation and problem solving skill are the essential indicators for successful learning. Hence, the existence of learning media which considerably follow the advance of technology has been assumed to be able to support the achievement of the indicators mentioned. Thus, the current research aimed at implementing the Augmented Reality (AR) technology to improve students’ problem solving skill, motivation, and learning outcomes. The sample was 56 of eighth graders which covered the both control and experimental classes. This quasi experimental research employed test and observation sheet as the instruments. The data was analyzed using one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The ANCOVA test results showed that were significance differences of the three indicators (problem solving skills, motivation, and learning outcomes) achieved, in which the experimental class was higher than control class. In conclusion, the AR can influence students’ problem solving skills, motivation, and learning outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Through AR technology, learners can interact with virtual objects, combining learning content with the real environment, creating immersive and sensorial learning environments.
“Through AR technology, learners can interact with virtual objects, combining learning content with the real environment, creating immersive and sensorial learning environments (Astuti et al., 2019).”
From Augmented Reality and Student Motivation: A Systematic Review (2013-2024) (2025) · cites this paper as Astuti et al., 2019
Cites
Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review
Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aldeeb, F. H., Sallabi, O. M., Elaish, M. M., & Hwang, G. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12989 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Augmented Reality and Student Motivation: A Systematic Review (2013-2024)
Zuo, R., Wenling, L., & Xuemei, Z. (2025) · Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning · doi:10.70232/jcsml.v2i1.23 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Astuti, F. N., Suranto, S., & Masykuri, M.
- Affiliations
- Sebelas Maret University (ID)
- Venue
- JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)
- Publisher
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
- Published
- 2019-07-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 305-312
- ISSN
- 2442-3750 (ISSN-L)
- 2527-6204
- OpenAlex
- W2955829964
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
- Keywords
- augmented reality, science education, problem-solving skills, student motivation, learning outcomes, eighth grade students, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review