Augmented Reality and Student Motivation: A Systematic Review (2013-2024)
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the impact of Augmented Reality (AR) technology on K-12 students’ learning motivation. AR, as an innovative instructional tool, integrates virtual objects into real-world settings, creating immersive and interactive learning environments. Learning motivation is a critical factor influencing students’ academic achievement, and AR technology provides autonomous and personalized learning experiences that enhance capabilities, reduce cognitive load, and improve learning outcomes. A systematic literature review methodology was adopted, analyzing 44 high-quality research articles published between 2013 and 2024 that examine the relationship between AR and learning motivation. The analysis revealed that AR technology is widely implemented in educational contexts, particularly in subjects such as mathematics, science, and art, offering authentic and engaging learning experiences. The findings highlight that AR significantly enhances students’ learning motivation by fostering autonomy, promoting interactive activities, and visualizing abstract concepts in intuitive ways. These features reduce cognitive load and improve comprehension, leading to better academic performance. Additionally, the novelty of AR stimulates students’ curiosity, driving sustained engagement and making learning more appealing and effective. The study underscores the potential of AR to transform traditional education by creating engaging and interactive learning experiences. Educators are encouraged to integrate AR into their instructional practices to foster students’ curiosity, motivation, and academic success. Future research should explore the long-term effects of AR technology and address challenges such as accessibility and teacher training to maximize its impact in educational settings.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review of 44 empirical K-12 studies (2013–2024) finds that augmented reality is generally associated with increased student learning motivation, especially in mathematics, science, and art. It reports 90% positive motivation findings but notes small samples, short durations, and limited geographic diversity.
Key findings
- 90% of reviewed studies reported a positive relationship between AR use and learning motivation; 10% reported a negative association, no evident positive effect, or only potential impact.
- Methodologically, 64% were quantitative, 30% mixed methods, and 6% qualitative; quasi-experimental designs were most common (62%), followed by experimental research (26%). ANCOVA (30%) and t-test (34%) were the most frequent analyses.
- Geographically, 52% of studies were conducted in China (including Taiwan); Turkey, Spain, and Malaysia each accounted for 18%, while the United States, France, Finland, and Portugal collectively constituted 30%.
- AR instruction occurred mainly in traditional classrooms (73%), with blended learning at 23% and outside-classroom use at 3%; applications concentrated in fundamental subjects such as science, geometry, art, physics, chemistry, biology, English, reading, and natural sciences.
Methods
- PRISMA-guided systematic literature review searching seven databases (Google Scholar, Springer Link, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE, Elsevier, CNKI) with keyword combinations; initial search yielded 231 articles, 33 duplicates removed, 198 screened, 152 excluded, 46 analyzed, 2 excluded, leaving 44 empirical studies from 27 journals.
- Inclusion criteria: K-12 contexts only; empirical quantitative, qualitative, design, or mixed-methods studies; AR technology only (excluding VR and MR); peer-reviewed journal articles; publication window 2013 to June 2024.
- Data extraction used a 29-field coding table, Zotero for reference management, LibreOffice Calc for synthesis, and VOSviewer for keyword co-occurrence network analysis; three researchers participated independently and collaboratively in selection.
Limitations
- Stated: reliance on existing literature means findings may reflect source-study biases; many included studies had small samples and limited geographic/cultural diversity; approximately 60% had durations under three months, restricting long-term conclusions; most were conducted in controlled classroom settings, limiting external validity; occasional negative motivation outcomes need further investigation.
- Stated: use of the ERIC database implies potential language and source biases, and geographic distribution suggests varying regional interest in AR.
- Evident from the text: terminology is inconsistent—RQ8 refers to “Virtual Reality (VR)” and the methodology mentions “VR and motivational analysis” although the review is about AR; reported geographic percentages sum to more than 100% (52% + 18% + 18% + 18% + 30%).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Mixed methods were used in 30% of the selected studies.
“These studies were categorized based on their methodologies as quantitative (64%), qualitative (6%), and mixed methods (30%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Experimental research constituted 26% of the studies.
“Among the selected studies, quasi-experimental designs were the most frequently employed (62%), followed by experimental research (26%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
AR technology is widely implemented in educational contexts, particularly in subjects such as mathematics, science, and art.
“The analysis revealed that AR technology is widely implemented in educational contexts, particularly in subjects such as mathematics, science, and art, offering authentic and engaging learning experiences.”
- Also stated in: § 4.1. Summary of Findings · plain
“First, AR has been predominantly applied in fundamental subjects such as mathematics, science, and art, emphasizing its capacity to offer immersive and engaging learning experiences”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § 4.1. Summary of Findings · plain
- Findingown data
Quasi-experimental designs were the most frequently employed (62%).
“Among the selected studies, quasi-experimental designs were the most frequently employed (62%), followed by experimental research (26%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
51% of the reported studies had a research duration ranging from 1 to 6 months.
“The majority of the reported studies (51%) had a research duration ranging from 1 to 6 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingreasoning
AR improves comprehension.
“These features reduce cognitive load and improve comprehension, leading to better academic performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The systematic review analyzed 44 high-quality research articles published between 2013 and 2024 that examine the relationship between AR and learning motivation.
“A systematic literature review methodology was adopted, analyzing 44 high-quality research articles published between 2013 and 2024 that examine the relationship between AR and learning motivation.”
- Also stated in: § Phase 2: Inclusion Criteria and Information Sources. · plain
“Finally, 44 empirical studies were included, originating from 27 different journals”
- Also stated in: § 4. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION · plain
“This study aimed to explore the relationship between learning motivation and augmented reality (AR) through a systematic review of 44 high-quality studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Phase 2: Inclusion Criteria and Information Sources. · plain
- Findingown data
The remaining countries collectively constituted 30% of the analyzed studies.
“The remaining countries, such as the United States, France, Finland, and Portugal, collectively constituted 30% of the analyzed studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Quantitative methods were used in 64% of the selected studies.
“These studies were categorized based on their methodologies as quantitative (64%), qualitative (6%), and mixed methods (30%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
AR significantly enhances students' learning motivation.
“The findings highlight that AR significantly enhances students' learning motivation by fostering autonomy, promoting interactive activities, and visualizing abstract concepts in intuitive ways.”
- Also stated in: § RQ6. What impact does the use of AR have on learning motivation? · hedged
“In general, 90% of the research indicates a positive relationship between students' learning motivation and the use of Augmented Reality (AR).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RQ6. What impact does the use of AR have on learning motivation? · hedged
- Findingown data
t-test was used in 34% of the studies.
“In terms of the analytical methods employed, ANCOVA and t-test were the most frequently utilized, comprising 30% and 34%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
AR reduces cognitive load.
“These features reduce cognitive load and improve comprehension, leading to better academic performance.”
- Also stated in: § RQ6. What impact does the use of AR have on learning motivation? · hedged
“Besides enhancing students' learning motivation, the utilization of AR also shows potential in reducing cognitive load and improving academic performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RQ6. What impact does the use of AR have on learning motivation? · hedged
- Findingown data
ANCOVA was used in 30% of the studies.
“In terms of the analytical methods employed, ANCOVA and t-test were the most frequently utilized, comprising 30% and 34%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Qualitative methods were used in 6% of the selected studies.
“These studies were categorized based on their methodologies as quantitative (64%), qualitative (6%), and mixed methods (30%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
39% of the studies utilized samples ranging between 25 to 100 participants.
“In this systematic review, 39% of the studies utilized samples ranging between 25 to 100 participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
90% of the research indicates a positive relationship between students' learning motivation and the use of AR.
“In general, 90% of the research indicates a positive relationship between students' learning motivation and the use of Augmented Reality (AR).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
52% of the research was conducted in China (including China Taiwan).
“The results indicate that 52% of the research was conducted in China (including China Taiwan).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The employment of AR for instructional practices outside the classroom constituted 3% of the reported studies.
“Finally, the employment of AR for instructional practices outside the classroom constituted 3% of the reported studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of the reviewed studies were conducted in controlled environments, such as classrooms.
“The majority of studies were conducted in controlled environments, such as classrooms, which may not fully represent the dynamic and multifaceted nature of real-world learning scenarios, particularly in extracurricular or blended learning settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The geographical distribution of the reviewed studies shows a notable emphasis on China, Malaysia, and Turkey.
“However, the geographical distribution of studies, with a notable emphasis on China, Malaysia, and Turkey, suggests that interest in AR may be influenced by regional educational priorities and technological adoption trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
73% of the analyzed articles were published in journals with relevant index categories.
“Among the analyzed articles, 73% were published in journals with relevant index categories, primarily falling under the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
67% of the analyzed articles were in the Education category.
“primarily falling under the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This review identified a growing use of AR in non-STEM domains such as art and language learning.
“our review identified its growing use in non-STEM domains such as art and language learning”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
A minority of the reviewed research found negative effects on learning motivation related to AR usage.
“However, it is worth noting that a minority of research has found negative effects on learning motivation related to AR usage (Garzón et al., 2019a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Garzón et al., 2019a source
- Findingnone given
Approximately 60% of the reviewed studies had a duration of less than three months.
“Approximately 60% of the reviewed studies had a duration of less than three months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The key concept network extracted from the articles consists of two primary nodes: augmented reality and motivation.
“In summary, the key concept network extracted from the articles included in this systematic review consists of two primary nodes: augmented reality and motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The samples in the reviewed studies often lacked diversity in terms of geographic and cultural representation.
“Moreover, the samples often lacked diversity in terms of geographic and cultural representation, which could affect the applicability of the results across different educational contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The results of this review diverge from earlier studies such as Amores-Valencia et al. (2022), which reported mixed or negative effects of AR on learning motivation.
“However, our results diverge from some earlier studies, such as those by Amores-Valencia et al. (2022), which reported mixed or negative effects of AR on learning motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Amores-Valencia et al. (2022)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
The primary methodological approaches employed in the reviewed studies are quasi-experimental or experimental methods.
“The primary approaches employed are quasi-experimental or experimental methods, which allow for controlled investigations of AR's impact on learning motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Blended learning accounted for 23% of the research.
“Blended learning accounted for 23% of the research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
73% of AR instructional practices were conducted in traditional classroom settings.
“In the analyzed studies, nearly three-quarters of AR instructional practices were conducted in traditional classroom settings (73%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
A considerable proportion of the analyzed studies relied on small sample sizes.
“a considerable proportion of the analyzed studies relied on small sample sizes (Chu et al., 2019)”
- Also stated in: § 4.3. Limitations · plain
“Many of the studies included in the review utilized small sample sizes, limiting the generalizability of their findings to broader populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chu et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 4.3. Limitations · plain
- Findingown data
The majority of the reviewed studies indicate that the use of AR has a positive impact on students' learning motivation.
“The majority of the studies indicate that the use of AR has a positive impact on students' learning motivation.”
- Also stated in: § 4.3. Limitations · plain
“while most studies report positive effects of AR on learning motivation, occasional negative outcomes warrant further investigation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 44 studies selected for the review are representative of the broader body of research on AR and learning motivation, so that aggregating their results supports general conclusions.
- Also stated in: § 4.3. Limitations · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
AR fosters autonomy in learning.
“The findings highlight that AR significantly enhances students' learning motivation by fostering autonomy, promoting interactive activities, and visualizing abstract concepts in intuitive ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Curiosity driven by AR novelty drives sustained engagement.
“Additionally, the novelty of AR stimulates students' curiosity, driving sustained engagement and making learning more appealing and effective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AR promotes interactive activities.
“The findings highlight that AR significantly enhances students' learning motivation by fostering autonomy, promoting interactive activities, and visualizing abstract concepts in intuitive ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AR visualizes abstract concepts in intuitive ways.
“The findings highlight that AR significantly enhances students' learning motivation by fostering autonomy, promoting interactive activities, and visualizing abstract concepts in intuitive ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Interest in AR may be influenced by regional educational priorities and technological adoption trends.
“suggests that interest in AR may be influenced by regional educational priorities and technological adoption trends”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Controlled classroom environments may not fully represent the dynamic and multifaceted nature of real-world learning scenarios, particularly in extracurricular or blended learning settings.
“which may not fully represent the dynamic and multifaceted nature of real-world learning scenarios, particularly in extracurricular or blended learning settings”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The findings of this study align with previous research in demonstrating the positive impact of AR on students' learning motivation.
“The findings of this study align with previous research in demonstrating the positive impact of augmented reality (AR) on students' learning motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Garzón et al. (2019b) source
- cites Anuar et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The findings may reflect biases present in the source studies, including variations in methodological rigor or reporting standards.
“As such, the findings may reflect biases present in the source studies, including variations in methodological rigor or reporting standards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Research on the impact of AR on learning motivation seems to be constrained by educational system characteristics, as evidenced by the emphasis on educational technology and student performance in the studies.
“On the other hand, it is observed that research on the impact of AR on learning motivation seems to be constrained by educational system characteristics, as evidenced by the emphasis on educational technology and student performance in the studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AR technology can empower students by providing opportunities for autonomous learning and customized learning experiences.
“AR technology can empower students by providing opportunities for autonomous learning and customized learning experiences (Yousef, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yousef, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Augmented reality can enhance capabilities by facilitating interactive and engaging activities that promote skill development.
“Furthermore, augmented reality can enhance capabilities by facilitating interactive and engaging activities that promote skill development (Djamas et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Djamas et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
AR fosters engagement by creating immersive and interactive learning environments that capture students' attention and curiosity.
“this review highlights how AR fosters engagement by creating immersive and interactive learning environments that capture students' attention and curiosity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AR has a unique potential to enhance motivation by creating immersive and interactive learning environments.
“The findings highlight ARs unique potential to enhance motivation by creating immersive and interactive learning environments, offering both theoretical and practical contributions to the field of educational technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AR has transformative potential in K-12 education, particularly for cultivating scientific thinking and practical skills in foundational disciplines.
“The findings underscore AR's transformative potential in K-12 education, particularly for cultivating scientific thinking and practical skills in foundational disciplines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The geographical distribution of the studies indicates varying levels of interest in AR among different education systems.
“the geographical distribution of the studies indicates varying levels of interest in AR among different education systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The small sample sizes of the reviewed studies represent a potential limitation when generalizing the findings to larger populations or diverse contexts.
“This aspect represents a potential limitation when attempting to generalize the findings to larger populations or diverse contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The emergence of AR technology injects new vitality into learning motivation.
“The emergence of AR technology injects new vitality into learning motivation (Tarng et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tarng et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 56
- May combine two claims. 20
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThematic analysis was employed in 2% of the studies.
“Moreover, regression analyses, cluster analysis, and thematic analysis were each employed in 3%, 3%, and 2% of the studies, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataKendall's W test constituted 5% of the methods applied.
“Additionally, a portion of studies utilized SEM path analysis and Kendall's W test, each constituting 5% of the methods applied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSEM path analysis constituted 5% of the methods applied.
“Additionally, a portion of studies utilized SEM path analysis and Kendall's W test, each constituting 5% of the methods applied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data9% of the studies used samples smaller than 25.
“9% of the studies used samples smaller than 25, and the remaining 4% did not report the sample size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMANCOVA accounted for 9% of the methods applied.
“Following these, MANCOVA and ANOVA accounted for 9% each.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data4% of the studies did not report the sample size.
“9% of the studies used samples smaller than 25, and the remaining 4% did not report the sample size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data10% of the studies report a negative association between AR implementation and students' learning motivation, with no evident positive facilitating effect or only indicating potential impact.
“However, 10% of the studies report a negative association between the implementation of AR in educational practices and students' learning motivation, with no evident positive facilitating effect or only indicating potential impact of AR on students' learning motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCluster analysis was employed in 3% of the studies.
“Moreover, regression analyses, cluster analysis, and thematic analysis were each employed in 3%, 3%, and 2% of the studies, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data25% of the studies involved sample sizes exceeding 100 and below 200.
“25% of the studies involved sample sizes exceeding 100 and below 200.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFactor research design and observational research each accounted for 1% of the total.
“Surveys as a research method were less prevalent, accounting for 6% of the studies, and other approaches, such as factor research design and observational research, each accounted for 1% of the total.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataExploratory research constituted 2% of the studies.
“Exploratory research constituted 2% of the total, while case studies were utilized in 2% of the research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataANOVA accounted for 9% of the methods applied.
“Following these, MANCOVA and ANOVA accounted for 9% each.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCase studies were utilized in 2% of the research.
“Exploratory research constituted 2% of the total, while case studies were utilized in 2% of the research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTurkey, Spain, and Malaysia each accounted for 18% of the research.
“The subsequent leading countries were Turkey, Spain, and Malaysia, accounting for 18% each.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSurveys as a research method accounted for 6% of the studies.
“Surveys as a research method were less prevalent, accounting for 6% of the studies, and other approaches, such as factor research design and observational research, each accounted for 1% of the total.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data7% of the studies reported a research duration of less than 1 month.
“7% of the studies reported a research duration of less than 1 month.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data26% of the studies had a duration between 6 months and 1 year.
“Studies with a duration between 6 months and 1 year accounted for 26%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataRegression analyses were employed in 3% of the studies.
“Moreover, regression analyses, cluster analysis, and thematic analysis were each employed in 3%, 3%, and 2% of the studies, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn the VOSviewer visualization, the terms augmented reality and virtual reality are closely linked.
“For instance, in the figure, the terms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe first cluster (15 items) is a conceptual network related to augmented reality, encompassing student performance, learning motivation, and technology.
“In Figure 4, the first cluster (15 items) is represented in red, forming a conceptual network related to augmented reality, encompassing elements such as student performance, learning motivation, and technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataApproximately 14% of the studies were conducted within a period of less than one week.
“Approximately 14% of the studies were conducted within a period of less than one week.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data33 articles were duplicates.
“The initial search yielded 231 articles, of which 33 were duplicates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data2 articles were excluded after consultation.
“The remaining 46 articles were independently analyzed and, after consultation, 2 articles were excluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataQuantitative methods are the most prevalent among the reviewed studies, with mixed methods increasingly gaining importance.
“it is evident that, similar to the typical approach in research on learning motivation, quantitative methods are the most prevalent, with mixed methods increasingly gaining importance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data46 articles remained and were independently analyzed.
“The remaining 46 articles were independently analyzed and, after consultation, 2 articles were excluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data3% of the articles covered computer technology.
“The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data2% of the articles covered health.
“The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAR's educational applications in the reviewed studies are primarily concentrated within classroom settings, with some instances of blended learning integration.
“The analysis of the studies reviewed in this paper suggests that AR's educational applications are primarily concentrated within classroom settings, although there are some instances of blended learning integration (Garzón et al., 2019a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Garzón et al., 2019a source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAugmented reality is depicted as one of the largest nodes in the VOSviewer visualization.
“For example,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe initial search yielded 231 articles.
“In this stage, we identified 231 articles from journals, conferences, books, and other sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ Augmented Reality and Student Motivation: A Systematic Review (2013-2024)2% of the analyzed articles were in the Educational Communication category.
“and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAR's integration into education remains concentrated in classroom settings, with limited exploration of its potential in extracurricular or blended learning environments.
“Second, AR's integration into education remains concentrated in classroom settings, with limited exploration of its potential in extracurricular or blended learning environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data4% of the articles covered natural sciences.
“The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given4% of the analyzed articles were in the E-Learning category.
“followed by”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data2% of the articles covered social psychology.
“The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe third cluster (10 items) is a conceptual network centered around the applications of augmented reality in animal studies and animal experiments.
“The third cluster (10 items) is depicted in blue, displaying a conceptual network centered around the applications of augmented reality in animal studies and animal experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data2% of the articles did not report the duration of their research.
“Furthermore, 2% of the articles did not report the duration of their research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe second cluster (12 items) is a conceptual network concerning learning motivation, analyzing the research impact on corresponding populations.
“The second cluster (12 items) appears in green and represents a conceptual network concerning learning motivation, analyzing the research impact on corresponding populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data1% of the articles covered language and linguistics.
“The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data152 articles were excluded after analysis of titles and abstracts.
“Once consensus was reached, 152 articles were excluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingreasoning198 articles remained after duplicates were removed.
“Based on the inclusion-exclusion criteria, an analysis of the titles and abstracts of the remaining 198 articles was conducted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data7% of the articles were categorized as Interdisciplinary.
“while 7% were categorized as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data8% of the articles were associated with journals categorized as Mathematics (Miscellaneous).
“Additionally, 8% of the articles were associated with journals categorized as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe novelty of AR stimulates students' curiosity.
“Additionally, the novelty of AR stimulates students' curiosity, driving sustained engagement and making learning more appealing and effective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAR makes learning more appealing and effective.
“Additionally, the novelty of AR stimulates students' curiosity, driving sustained engagement and making learning more appealing and effective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningImproved comprehension leads to better academic performance.
“These features reduce cognitive load and improve comprehension, leading to better academic performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenApart from the expected prevalence of research conducted in China (including Taiwan), other countries such as Malaysia and Turkey have shown high levels of interest in competitive educational models.
“Apart from the expected prevalence of research conducted in China (including Taiwan), other countries such as Malaysia and Turkey have shown high levels of interest in competitive educational models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe use of AR allows students to immerse themselves in authentic scientific learning experiences, stimulating their learning motivation and achievement, while enhancing the flexibility and interactivity of learning activities.
“The use of AR allows students to immerse themselves in authentic scientific learning experiences, stimulating their learning motivation and achievement, while enhancing the flexibility and interactivity of learning activities (Estapa & Nadolny, 2015;Lu et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Estapa & Nadolny, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lu et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wang et al., 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThrough AR technology, learners can interact with virtual objects, combining learning content with the real environment, creating immersive and sensorial learning environments.
“Through AR technology, learners can interact with virtual objects, combining learning content with the real environment, creating immersive and sensorial learning environments (Astuti et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Astuti et al., 2019 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study primarily relied on a systematic review of existing literature, which is inherently dependent on the quality and comprehensiveness of the selected articles.
“The study primarily relied on a systematic review of existing literature, which is inherently dependent on the quality and comprehensiveness of the selected articles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe study identifies key areas where AR can be effectively integrated into education, particularly in fundamental subjects like mathematics and science.
“The study identifies key areas where AR can be effectively integrated into education, particularly in fundamental subjects like mathematics and science, offering actionable insights for educators and policymakers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe short duration of most reviewed studies restricts understanding of AR's long-term impact on learning motivation, as most findings capture only short-term effects.
“This limitation restricts the understanding of AR's long-term impact on learning motivation, as most findings capture only short-term effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAR learning applications in education have been widely utilized as interactive digital learning platforms for complex and abstract concepts in certain courses, such as mathematics and geometry, science, geography, and art.
“AR learning applications in the field of education have been widely utilized as interactive digital learning platforms for complex and abstract concepts in certain courses, such as mathematics and geometry, science, geography, and art (Bistaman et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bistaman et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe systematic review was conducted following PRISMA standards.
“A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, which included defining inclusion criteria, information sources, search strategies, study selection process, data collection process, and data presentation and synthesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThis novel learning approach stimulates learners' curiosity, exploratory drive, and agency, thereby increasing the appeal and effectiveness of learning.
“This novel learning approach stimulates learners' curiosity, exploratory drive, and agency, thereby increasing the appeal and effectiveness of learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe use of the ERIC database implies potential biases (e.g., language and sources) in the sample selection process.
“Considering that the use of the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) database implies potential biases (e.g., language and sources) in the sample selection process”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningTo mitigate potential reporting bias, both participants and evaluators were blinded to the study hypotheses.
“To mitigate potential reporting bias, we employed the following strategies: Double-Blind Procedures: Both participants and evaluators were blinded to the study hypotheses to reduce subjective influences during data collection and interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLearning mathematical objects with AR proved more effective than teacher drawings or verbal descriptions, and students faced no difficulties in visualizing objects in three-dimensional space.
“Through this research, it was determined that learning mathematical objects proved more effective than teacher drawings or verbal descriptions, and students faced no difficulties in visualizing objects in three-dimensional space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al. (2016) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationLess structured AR environments, as in Khan et al. (2019), might have caused cognitive overload or frustration for some students.
“Khan et al. (2019) focused on less structured AR environments, which might have caused cognitive overload or frustration for some students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Khan et al. (2019) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe study underscores the potential of AR to transform traditional education by creating engaging and interactive learning experiences.
“The study underscores the potential of AR to transform traditional education by creating engaging and interactive learning experiences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIndependent researchers reviewed the raw data and analytic processes to identify discrepancies and ensure accuracy.
“Cross-Checking of Data: Independent researchers reviewed the raw data and analytic processes to identify discrepancies and ensure accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThree researchers independently and subsequently collaboratively participated in the selection process at different stages, based on predetermined inclusion criteria and explicit inclusion review.
“Three researchers independently and subsequently collaboratively participated in the selection process at different stages, based on predetermined inclusion criteria and explicit inclusion review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTraditional learning approaches often rely on textbooks, lectures, and handouts, which may present challenges in terms of the abstract nature of the learning content and the lack of tangible experiences, potentially resulting in dull and difficult learning experiences.
“Traditional learning approaches often rely on textbooks, lectures, and handouts as conventional instructional resources, which may present challenges in terms of the abstract nature of the learning content and the lack of tangible experiences, potentially resulting in dull and difficult learning experiences (Kul & Berbe, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kul & Berbe, 2022 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAR enhances autonomous learning and reduces cognitive load, which are critical factors in increasing learning motivation.
“the findings suggest that AR enhances autonomous learning and reduces cognitive load, which are critical factors in increasing learning motivation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAR systems not only provide foundational knowledge to students but also offer flexibility and innovation, actively enhancing students' motivation to learn.
“Furthermore, numerous studies have proposed AR learning activities, demonstrating that AR systems not only provide foundational knowledge to students but also offer flexibility and innovation, actively enhancing students' motivation to learn (Djamas et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Djamas et al., 2018 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study systematically analyzed 44 high-quality studies, providing a broad and detailed understanding of how AR influences learning motivation across various educational levels, domains, and teaching modes.
“By systematically analyzing 44 high-quality studies, this research provides a broad and detailed understanding of how AR influences learning motivation, encompassing various educational levels, domains, and teaching modes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 44 studies selected for the review are representative of the broader body of research on AR and learning motivation, so that aggregating their results supports general conclusions.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy alleviating cognitive load, AR technology can enhance students' motivation and learning outcomes.
“By alleviating cognitive load, AR technology can enhance students' motivation and learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe discrepancies between this review's results and earlier studies could stem from differences in study designs, sample characteristics, or the specific AR applications used.
“These discrepancies could stem from differences in study designs, sample characteristics, or the specific AR applications used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The 44 included articles are high-quality.
“analyzing 44 high-quality research articles published between 2013 and 2024”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 44 included studies are sufficiently comparable in their measures of learning motivation and AR interventions to be synthesized into general conclusions.
“In general, 90% of the research indicates a positive relationship between students' learning motivation and the use of Augmented Reality (AR).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The search strategy and databases used captured all relevant literature on AR and learning motivation.
“Seven electronic databases (Google Scholar, Springer Link, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE, Elsevier, and CNKI) were searched using a combination of keywords.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The inclusion and exclusion criteria correctly identified relevant empirical studies.
“Based on the research objectives, a further selection was made from the initially screened literature, following these steps:”
The paper relies on this without support.
The positive relationship between AR and motivation found in 90% of studies is not due to publication bias.
“In general, 90% of the research indicates a positive relationship between students' learning motivation and the use of Augmented Reality (AR).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 44 studies selected for the review are representative of the broader body of research on AR and learning motivation, so that aggregating their results supports general conclusions.
“By systematically analyzing 44 high-quality studies, this research provides a broad and detailed understanding of how AR influences learning motivation, encompassing various educational levels, domains, and teaching modes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The reviewed studies' measures of learning motivation validly capture students' learning motivation.
“The majority of the studies indicate that the use of AR has a positive impact on students' learning motivation.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Geographic shares exceed 100%
MajorThe stated shares for China, Turkey, Spain, Malaysia, and the remaining countries total 136%, although they are presented as a distribution of the analyzed studies.
Reported 100 · recomputed 136
“52% of the research was conducted in China (including China Taiwan).The subsequent leading countries were Turkey, Spain, and Malaysia, accounting for 18% each.The remaining countries, such as the United States, France, Finland, and Portugal, collectively constituted 30% of the analyzed studies.”
RQ8 describes VR applications despite excluding VR studies
MinorThe RQ8 answer attributes the reviewed subject distribution to Virtual Reality, whereas the selection criteria expressly exclude VR studies and require AR as the focus.
“The application of Virtual Reality (VR) in the field of basic education is primarily concentrated in three domains:”
“(3) The focus had to be on AR technology, excluding studies related to VR and MR.”
Pre-2005 article conflicts with the stated review period
MinorThe paper describes the remaining 44 included articles as the basis for this publication-year overview, but says one article predates 2005. Its stated inclusion period begins in 2013.
“At this stage, the remaining 44 articles were categorized based on the publisher's name and publication year, and a brief overview of these articles is presented in Figure 2. Figure 3 displays the percentage of papers for each publisher.A meticulous analysis of these articles was conducted, highlighting their strengths and limitations.It is evident that prior to 2005, there was only one article in this field.”
“The literature included in this review consisted of articles published in journals from 2013 to 2024.”
Shorter-duration category is larger than its containing category
MinorEvery study lasting less than one week also lasted less than one month, so the former category cannot comprise 14% of studies when the latter comprises only 7%.
“7% of the studies reported a research duration of less than 1 month.”
“Approximately 14% of the studies were conducted within a period of less than one week.”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
- Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The Effect of an Augmented Reality Enhanced Mathematics Lesson on Student Achievement and Motivation. Journal of STEM Education, 16(3).
- Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019b). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23, 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of Virtual Reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85-119.
- Liou, H.-H., Yang, S. J. H., Chen, S. Y., & Tarng, W. (2017). The Influences of the 2D Image-Based Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality on Student Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 110-121.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Isnaniah, I., Marlina, M., & Ningsih, R. P. (2025) · Salud Ciencia y Tecnología · doi:10.56294/saludcyt20252214 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Misliza, S., Anisah, Erita, Y., & Muhammadi (2025) · Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA · doi:10.29303/jppipa.v11i12.13533 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kayaalp, F., Meral, E., & GÖKBULUT, B. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2670533 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Touch the Derivative: Learning Mathematics with Augmented Reality
Swidan, O., Bagossi, S., Schacht, F., & Sabena, C. (2025) · Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s40751-025-00192-x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Effect of Augmented and Virtual Reality Applications in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language
İNALÖZ, A. B., & Yılmaz, K. (2025) · e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.30900/kafkasegt.1477439
Bhattacharya, S., Sau, A., Bera, P., Sardar, C., Chaudhuri, S., & Thakur, N. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1655843 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Oju, J. U., Vincent, O. R., & Onwodi, G. O. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA) · doi:10.1109/acdsa67686.2026.11467826
Kozlova, Z., Edelsbrunner, P. A., Warkentin, M., Hoyer, C., Küchemann, S., Jochen, K., & Hofer, S. I. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105658
Augmented Reality for Visualizing Islamic History: Improving Student Engagement in SKI Learning
Hasan, H., & Ambarayadi, B. (2025) · Zawayatul Fikr Journal of Islamic Education · doi:10.67198/zafie.v1i2.16
Yakin, A. M. A., Muthmainnah, M., Matari, A. S. A., Cardoso, L., & Obaid, A. J. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-41632-3.00016-3
Mogollón, G. J. M., & Cano-Salerno, J. (2025) · doi:10.47212/tendencias2025vol.xxviii.2
ARABACI, S., & Kardaş, F. (2026) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1799103
Akalın, T. C., ÖZELGÜL, İ. N., & Eler, N. (2026) · The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport · doi:10.22282/tojras.1883650
- Authors
- Zuo, R., Wenling, L., & Xuemei, Z.
- Affiliations
- Xihua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Zuo, Ruijia
- Venue
- Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning
- Publisher
- PT Scientia Publica Media
- Published
- 2025-02-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-52
- ISSN
- 3047-4876 (ISSN-L)
- 3047-6755
- OpenAlex
- W4407300227
- Semantic Scholar
- cbd20f86a3978408f31fc2d6a524ae3b4c131573
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Xihua University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Multimedia Learning Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- augmented reality, student motivation, K-12 students, cognitive load, student independence, personalized learning, immersive learning environments, academic performance, curiosity, teacher professional development, educational technology integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-02.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-02.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review