Cited by 13Augmented Reality ApplicationsMultimedia Learning SystemsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Augmented Reality and Student Motivation: A Systematic Review (2013-2024)

Open access
Zuo, Ruijia, Wenling, Li, Xuemei, Zhang·2025·Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of Augmented Reality (AR) technology on K-12 students’ learning motivation. AR, as an innovative instructional tool, integrates virtual objects into real-world settings, creating immersive and interactive learning environments. Learning motivation is a critical factor influencing students’ academic achievement, and AR technology provides autonomous and personalized learning experiences that enhance capabilities, reduce cognitive load, and improve learning outcomes. A systematic literature review methodology was adopted, analyzing 44 high-quality research articles published between 2013 and 2024 that examine the relationship between AR and learning motivation. The analysis revealed that AR technology is widely implemented in educational contexts, particularly in subjects such as mathematics, science, and art, offering authentic and engaging learning experiences. The findings highlight that AR significantly enhances students’ learning motivation by fostering autonomy, promoting interactive activities, and visualizing abstract concepts in intuitive ways. These features reduce cognitive load and improve comprehension, leading to better academic performance. Additionally, the novelty of AR stimulates students’ curiosity, driving sustained engagement and making learning more appealing and effective. The study underscores the potential of AR to transform traditional education by creating engaging and interactive learning experiences. Educators are encouraged to integrate AR into their instructional practices to foster students’ curiosity, motivation, and academic success. Future research should explore the long-term effects of AR technology and address challenges such as accessibility and teacher training to maximize its impact in educational settings.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review of 44 empirical K-12 studies (2013–2024) finds that augmented reality is generally associated with increased student learning motivation, especially in mathematics, science, and art. It reports 90% positive motivation findings but notes small samples, short durations, and limited geographic diversity.

Key findings

  • 90% of reviewed studies reported a positive relationship between AR use and learning motivation; 10% reported a negative association, no evident positive effect, or only potential impact.
  • Methodologically, 64% were quantitative, 30% mixed methods, and 6% qualitative; quasi-experimental designs were most common (62%), followed by experimental research (26%). ANCOVA (30%) and t-test (34%) were the most frequent analyses.
  • Geographically, 52% of studies were conducted in China (including Taiwan); Turkey, Spain, and Malaysia each accounted for 18%, while the United States, France, Finland, and Portugal collectively constituted 30%.
  • AR instruction occurred mainly in traditional classrooms (73%), with blended learning at 23% and outside-classroom use at 3%; applications concentrated in fundamental subjects such as science, geometry, art, physics, chemistry, biology, English, reading, and natural sciences.

Methods

  • PRISMA-guided systematic literature review searching seven databases (Google Scholar, Springer Link, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE, Elsevier, CNKI) with keyword combinations; initial search yielded 231 articles, 33 duplicates removed, 198 screened, 152 excluded, 46 analyzed, 2 excluded, leaving 44 empirical studies from 27 journals.
  • Inclusion criteria: K-12 contexts only; empirical quantitative, qualitative, design, or mixed-methods studies; AR technology only (excluding VR and MR); peer-reviewed journal articles; publication window 2013 to June 2024.
  • Data extraction used a 29-field coding table, Zotero for reference management, LibreOffice Calc for synthesis, and VOSviewer for keyword co-occurrence network analysis; three researchers participated independently and collaboratively in selection.

Limitations

  • Stated: reliance on existing literature means findings may reflect source-study biases; many included studies had small samples and limited geographic/cultural diversity; approximately 60% had durations under three months, restricting long-term conclusions; most were conducted in controlled classroom settings, limiting external validity; occasional negative motivation outcomes need further investigation.
  • Stated: use of the ERIC database implies potential language and source biases, and geographic distribution suggests varying regional interest in AR.
  • Evident from the text: terminology is inconsistent—RQ8 refers to “Virtual Reality (VR)” and the methodology mentions “VR and motivational analysis” although the review is about AR; reported geographic percentages sum to more than 100% (52% + 18% + 18% + 18% + 30%).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70232/jcsml.v2i1.23

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Mixed methods were used in 30% of the selected studies.

    “These studies were categorized based on their methodologies as quantitative (64%), qualitative (6%), and mixed methods (30%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Experimental research constituted 26% of the studies.

    “Among the selected studies, quasi-experimental designs were the most frequently employed (62%), followed by experimental research (26%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    AR technology is widely implemented in educational contexts, particularly in subjects such as mathematics, science, and art.

    “The analysis revealed that AR technology is widely implemented in educational contexts, particularly in subjects such as mathematics, science, and art, offering authentic and engaging learning experiences.”
    • Also stated in: § 4.1. Summary of Findings · plain
      “First, AR has been predominantly applied in fundamental subjects such as mathematics, science, and art, emphasizing its capacity to offer immersive and engaging learning experiences”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Quasi-experimental designs were the most frequently employed (62%).

    “Among the selected studies, quasi-experimental designs were the most frequently employed (62%), followed by experimental research (26%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    51% of the reported studies had a research duration ranging from 1 to 6 months.

    “The majority of the reported studies (51%) had a research duration ranging from 1 to 6 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 56
  • May combine two claims. 20
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Thematic analysis was employed in 2% of the studies.

    “Moreover, regression analyses, cluster analysis, and thematic analysis were each employed in 3%, 3%, and 2% of the studies, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Kendall's W test constituted 5% of the methods applied.

    “Additionally, a portion of studies utilized SEM path analysis and Kendall's W test, each constituting 5% of the methods applied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    SEM path analysis constituted 5% of the methods applied.

    “Additionally, a portion of studies utilized SEM path analysis and Kendall's W test, each constituting 5% of the methods applied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    9% of the studies used samples smaller than 25.

    “9% of the studies used samples smaller than 25, and the remaining 4% did not report the sample size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    MANCOVA accounted for 9% of the methods applied.

    “Following these, MANCOVA and ANOVA accounted for 9% each.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    4% of the studies did not report the sample size.

    “9% of the studies used samples smaller than 25, and the remaining 4% did not report the sample size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    10% of the studies report a negative association between AR implementation and students' learning motivation, with no evident positive facilitating effect or only indicating potential impact.

    “However, 10% of the studies report a negative association between the implementation of AR in educational practices and students' learning motivation, with no evident positive facilitating effect or only indicating potential impact of AR on students' learning motivation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Cluster analysis was employed in 3% of the studies.

    “Moreover, regression analyses, cluster analysis, and thematic analysis were each employed in 3%, 3%, and 2% of the studies, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    25% of the studies involved sample sizes exceeding 100 and below 200.

    “25% of the studies involved sample sizes exceeding 100 and below 200.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Factor research design and observational research each accounted for 1% of the total.

    “Surveys as a research method were less prevalent, accounting for 6% of the studies, and other approaches, such as factor research design and observational research, each accounted for 1% of the total.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Exploratory research constituted 2% of the studies.

    “Exploratory research constituted 2% of the total, while case studies were utilized in 2% of the research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    ANOVA accounted for 9% of the methods applied.

    “Following these, MANCOVA and ANOVA accounted for 9% each.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Case studies were utilized in 2% of the research.

    “Exploratory research constituted 2% of the total, while case studies were utilized in 2% of the research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Turkey, Spain, and Malaysia each accounted for 18% of the research.

    “The subsequent leading countries were Turkey, Spain, and Malaysia, accounting for 18% each.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Surveys as a research method accounted for 6% of the studies.

    “Surveys as a research method were less prevalent, accounting for 6% of the studies, and other approaches, such as factor research design and observational research, each accounted for 1% of the total.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    7% of the studies reported a research duration of less than 1 month.

    “7% of the studies reported a research duration of less than 1 month.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    26% of the studies had a duration between 6 months and 1 year.

    “Studies with a duration between 6 months and 1 year accounted for 26%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Regression analyses were employed in 3% of the studies.

    “Moreover, regression analyses, cluster analysis, and thematic analysis were each employed in 3%, 3%, and 2% of the studies, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In the VOSviewer visualization, the terms augmented reality and virtual reality are closely linked.

    “For instance, in the figure, the terms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The first cluster (15 items) is a conceptual network related to augmented reality, encompassing student performance, learning motivation, and technology.

    “In Figure 4, the first cluster (15 items) is represented in red, forming a conceptual network related to augmented reality, encompassing elements such as student performance, learning motivation, and technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Approximately 14% of the studies were conducted within a period of less than one week.

    “Approximately 14% of the studies were conducted within a period of less than one week.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    33 articles were duplicates.

    “The initial search yielded 231 articles, of which 33 were duplicates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    2 articles were excluded after consultation.

    “The remaining 46 articles were independently analyzed and, after consultation, 2 articles were excluded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Quantitative methods are the most prevalent among the reviewed studies, with mixed methods increasingly gaining importance.

    “it is evident that, similar to the typical approach in research on learning motivation, quantitative methods are the most prevalent, with mixed methods increasingly gaining importance”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    46 articles remained and were independently analyzed.

    “The remaining 46 articles were independently analyzed and, after consultation, 2 articles were excluded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    3% of the articles covered computer technology.

    “The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    2% of the articles covered health.

    “The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    AR's educational applications in the reviewed studies are primarily concentrated within classroom settings, with some instances of blended learning integration.

    “The analysis of the studies reviewed in this paper suggests that AR's educational applications are primarily concentrated within classroom settings, although there are some instances of blended learning integration (Garzón et al., 2019a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garzón et al., 2019a source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Augmented reality is depicted as one of the largest nodes in the VOSviewer visualization.

    “For example,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The initial search yielded 231 articles.

    “In this stage, we identified 231 articles from journals, conferences, books, and other sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Augmented Reality and Student Motivation: A Systematic Review (2013-2024)

    2% of the analyzed articles were in the Educational Communication category.

    “and”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    AR's integration into education remains concentrated in classroom settings, with limited exploration of its potential in extracurricular or blended learning environments.

    “Second, AR's integration into education remains concentrated in classroom settings, with limited exploration of its potential in extracurricular or blended learning environments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    4% of the articles covered natural sciences.

    “The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    4% of the analyzed articles were in the E-Learning category.

    “followed by”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    2% of the articles covered social psychology.

    “The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The third cluster (10 items) is a conceptual network centered around the applications of augmented reality in animal studies and animal experiments.

    “The third cluster (10 items) is depicted in blue, displaying a conceptual network centered around the applications of augmented reality in animal studies and animal experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    2% of the articles did not report the duration of their research.

    “Furthermore, 2% of the articles did not report the duration of their research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The second cluster (12 items) is a conceptual network concerning learning motivation, analyzing the research impact on corresponding populations.

    “The second cluster (12 items) appears in green and represents a conceptual network concerning learning motivation, analyzing the research impact on corresponding populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    1% of the articles covered language and linguistics.

    “The remaining articles covered various topics related to natural sciences (4%), health (2%), social psychology (2%), language and linguistics (1%), and computer technology (3%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    152 articles were excluded after analysis of titles and abstracts.

    “Once consensus was reached, 152 articles were excluded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    198 articles remained after duplicates were removed.

    “Based on the inclusion-exclusion criteria, an analysis of the titles and abstracts of the remaining 198 articles was conducted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    7% of the articles were categorized as Interdisciplinary.

    “while 7% were categorized as”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    8% of the articles were associated with journals categorized as Mathematics (Miscellaneous).

    “Additionally, 8% of the articles were associated with journals categorized as”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The novelty of AR stimulates students' curiosity.

    “Additionally, the novelty of AR stimulates students' curiosity, driving sustained engagement and making learning more appealing and effective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AR makes learning more appealing and effective.

    “Additionally, the novelty of AR stimulates students' curiosity, driving sustained engagement and making learning more appealing and effective.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Improved comprehension leads to better academic performance.

    “These features reduce cognitive load and improve comprehension, leading to better academic performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Apart from the expected prevalence of research conducted in China (including Taiwan), other countries such as Malaysia and Turkey have shown high levels of interest in competitive educational models.

    “Apart from the expected prevalence of research conducted in China (including Taiwan), other countries such as Malaysia and Turkey have shown high levels of interest in competitive educational models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The use of AR allows students to immerse themselves in authentic scientific learning experiences, stimulating their learning motivation and achievement, while enhancing the flexibility and interactivity of learning activities.

    “The use of AR allows students to immerse themselves in authentic scientific learning experiences, stimulating their learning motivation and achievement, while enhancing the flexibility and interactivity of learning activities (Estapa & Nadolny, 2015;Lu et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Estapa & Nadolny, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lu et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Wang et al., 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Through AR technology, learners can interact with virtual objects, combining learning content with the real environment, creating immersive and sensorial learning environments.

    “Through AR technology, learners can interact with virtual objects, combining learning content with the real environment, creating immersive and sensorial learning environments (Astuti et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Astuti et al., 2019 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study primarily relied on a systematic review of existing literature, which is inherently dependent on the quality and comprehensiveness of the selected articles.

    “The study primarily relied on a systematic review of existing literature, which is inherently dependent on the quality and comprehensiveness of the selected articles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The study identifies key areas where AR can be effectively integrated into education, particularly in fundamental subjects like mathematics and science.

    “The study identifies key areas where AR can be effectively integrated into education, particularly in fundamental subjects like mathematics and science, offering actionable insights for educators and policymakers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The short duration of most reviewed studies restricts understanding of AR's long-term impact on learning motivation, as most findings capture only short-term effects.

    “This limitation restricts the understanding of AR's long-term impact on learning motivation, as most findings capture only short-term effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    AR learning applications in education have been widely utilized as interactive digital learning platforms for complex and abstract concepts in certain courses, such as mathematics and geometry, science, geography, and art.

    “AR learning applications in the field of education have been widely utilized as interactive digital learning platforms for complex and abstract concepts in certain courses, such as mathematics and geometry, science, geography, and art (Bistaman et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bistaman et al., 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA standards.

    “A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, which included defining inclusion criteria, information sources, search strategies, study selection process, data collection process, and data presentation and synthesis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    This novel learning approach stimulates learners' curiosity, exploratory drive, and agency, thereby increasing the appeal and effectiveness of learning.

    “This novel learning approach stimulates learners' curiosity, exploratory drive, and agency, thereby increasing the appeal and effectiveness of learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The use of the ERIC database implies potential biases (e.g., language and sources) in the sample selection process.

    “Considering that the use of the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) database implies potential biases (e.g., language and sources) in the sample selection process”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To mitigate potential reporting bias, both participants and evaluators were blinded to the study hypotheses.

    “To mitigate potential reporting bias, we employed the following strategies: Double-Blind Procedures: Both participants and evaluators were blinded to the study hypotheses to reduce subjective influences during data collection and interpretation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Learning mathematical objects with AR proved more effective than teacher drawings or verbal descriptions, and students faced no difficulties in visualizing objects in three-dimensional space.

    “Through this research, it was determined that learning mathematical objects proved more effective than teacher drawings or verbal descriptions, and students faced no difficulties in visualizing objects in three-dimensional space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al. (2016) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Less structured AR environments, as in Khan et al. (2019), might have caused cognitive overload or frustration for some students.

    “Khan et al. (2019) focused on less structured AR environments, which might have caused cognitive overload or frustration for some students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khan et al. (2019) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The study underscores the potential of AR to transform traditional education by creating engaging and interactive learning experiences.

    “The study underscores the potential of AR to transform traditional education by creating engaging and interactive learning experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Independent researchers reviewed the raw data and analytic processes to identify discrepancies and ensure accuracy.

    “Cross-Checking of Data: Independent researchers reviewed the raw data and analytic processes to identify discrepancies and ensure accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Three researchers independently and subsequently collaboratively participated in the selection process at different stages, based on predetermined inclusion criteria and explicit inclusion review.

    “Three researchers independently and subsequently collaboratively participated in the selection process at different stages, based on predetermined inclusion criteria and explicit inclusion review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Traditional learning approaches often rely on textbooks, lectures, and handouts, which may present challenges in terms of the abstract nature of the learning content and the lack of tangible experiences, potentially resulting in dull and difficult learning experiences.

    “Traditional learning approaches often rely on textbooks, lectures, and handouts as conventional instructional resources, which may present challenges in terms of the abstract nature of the learning content and the lack of tangible experiences, potentially resulting in dull and difficult learning experiences (Kul & Berbe, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kul & Berbe, 2022 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AR enhances autonomous learning and reduces cognitive load, which are critical factors in increasing learning motivation.

    “the findings suggest that AR enhances autonomous learning and reduces cognitive load, which are critical factors in increasing learning motivation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AR systems not only provide foundational knowledge to students but also offer flexibility and innovation, actively enhancing students' motivation to learn.

    “Furthermore, numerous studies have proposed AR learning activities, demonstrating that AR systems not only provide foundational knowledge to students but also offer flexibility and innovation, actively enhancing students' motivation to learn (Djamas et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Djamas et al., 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study systematically analyzed 44 high-quality studies, providing a broad and detailed understanding of how AR influences learning motivation across various educational levels, domains, and teaching modes.

    “By systematically analyzing 44 high-quality studies, this research provides a broad and detailed understanding of how AR influences learning motivation, encompassing various educational levels, domains, and teaching modes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 44 studies selected for the review are representative of the broader body of research on AR and learning motivation, so that aggregating their results supports general conclusions.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By alleviating cognitive load, AR technology can enhance students' motivation and learning outcomes.

    “By alleviating cognitive load, AR technology can enhance students' motivation and learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The discrepancies between this review's results and earlier studies could stem from differences in study designs, sample characteristics, or the specific AR applications used.

    “These discrepancies could stem from differences in study designs, sample characteristics, or the specific AR applications used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
68 of 68
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 44 included articles are high-quality.

    “analyzing 44 high-quality research articles published between 2013 and 2024”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 44 included studies are sufficiently comparable in their measures of learning motivation and AR interventions to be synthesized into general conclusions.

    “In general, 90% of the research indicates a positive relationship between students' learning motivation and the use of Augmented Reality (AR).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The search strategy and databases used captured all relevant literature on AR and learning motivation.

    “Seven electronic databases (Google Scholar, Springer Link, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE, Elsevier, and CNKI) were searched using a combination of keywords.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The inclusion and exclusion criteria correctly identified relevant empirical studies.

    “Based on the research objectives, a further selection was made from the initially screened literature, following these steps:”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The positive relationship between AR and motivation found in 90% of studies is not due to publication bias.

    “In general, 90% of the research indicates a positive relationship between students' learning motivation and the use of Augmented Reality (AR).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 44 studies selected for the review are representative of the broader body of research on AR and learning motivation, so that aggregating their results supports general conclusions.

    “By systematically analyzing 44 high-quality studies, this research provides a broad and detailed understanding of how AR influences learning motivation, encompassing various educational levels, domains, and teaching modes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reviewed studies' measures of learning motivation validly capture students' learning motivation.

    “The majority of the studies indicate that the use of AR has a positive impact on students' learning motivation.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Geographic shares exceed 100%

    Major

    The stated shares for China, Turkey, Spain, Malaysia, and the remaining countries total 136%, although they are presented as a distribution of the analyzed studies.

    Reported 100 · recomputed 136

  • RQ8 describes VR applications despite excluding VR studies

    Minor

    The RQ8 answer attributes the reviewed subject distribution to Virtual Reality, whereas the selection criteria expressly exclude VR studies and require AR as the focus.

  • Pre-2005 article conflicts with the stated review period

    Minor

    The paper describes the remaining 44 included articles as the basis for this publication-year overview, but says one article predates 2005. Its stated inclusion period begins in 2013.

  • Shorter-duration category is larger than its containing category

    Minor

    Every study lasting less than one week also lasted less than one month, so the former category cannot comprise 14% of studies when the latter comprises only 7%.

4 of 4

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
  2. Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The Effect of an Augmented Reality Enhanced Mathematics Lesson on Student Achievement and Motivation. Journal of STEM Education, 16(3).
  3. Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019b). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23, 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of Virtual Reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85-119.
  5. Liou, H.-H., Yang, S. J. H., Chen, S. Y., & Tarng, W. (2017). The Influences of the 2D Image-Based Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality on Student Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 110-121.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zuo, R., Wenling, L., & Xuemei, Z.
Affiliations
Xihua University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning
Published
2025-02-10
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
38-52
ISSN
  • 3047-4876 (ISSN-L)
  • 3047-6755
OpenAlex
W4407300227
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Xihua University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Multimedia Learning Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
augmented reality, student motivation, K-12 students, cognitive load, student independence, personalized learning, immersive learning environments, academic performance, curiosity, teacher professional development, educational technology integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-02.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-02.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review