Cited by 22Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical Education

Patients’ Messages as Educators in an Interprofessional Health Education Program

Open access
Doucet, Shelley, Lauckner, Heidi, Wells, Sandy·2013·Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education

Abstract

Background: Patients have traditionally played a passive role in health professional education. Health Mentors Programs are new, innovative interprofessional education initiatives that involve "health mentors" (volunteer community patient educators), who share their experiences navigating the healthcare system with an interprofessional team of four health professional students. The purpose of this research was to explore what motivated the patient educators to participate in the Dalhousie Health Mentors Program and what messages they wanted to instill in health professional students.Methods: Data were collected through seven semi-structured focus groups (N = 29) and one individual interview (N = 1), which were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative inductive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.Findings: Our study demonstrated that patients want to play an active role in educating health professional students with the hope of improving the healthcare system. The mentors wanted to convey to the students the importance of interprofessional collaboration, understanding patients are people first, listening to patients, and understanding the visible and invisible impacts of living with chronic conditions.Conclusions: If we expect our students to become competent in providing interprofessional, patient-centred care, it is important that we provide opportunities for patients to be actively involved in health professional education, as they have important messages that cannot be taught from a textbook.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22230/jripe.2013v3n1a98

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 22

Authors
Doucet, S., Lauckner, H., & Wells, S.
Affiliations
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education
Published
2013-03-27
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
1916-7342 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W280406431
Cited by
22
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
patient educators, interprofessional education, patient-centered care, interprofessional collaboration, chronic disease, patient experience, health professions students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review