Cited by 8Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

A Case Study of Organizational and Curricular Attributes for Interprofessional Education: A Model for Sustainable Curriculum Delivery

Open access
Azzam, Mohammad, Drynan, Donna, Fricke, Moni, Langlois, Sylvia, MacDonald, Laura, Vanier, Marie-Claude, Puvirajah, Anton·2023·Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education

Abstract

Background: In health and social care (HASC) professional education, interprofessional competencies are optimally developed by engaging in interprofessional education (IPE) activities that are delivered sustainably along a continuum. Ultimately, active engagement in IPE is meant to prepare future practitioners for interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP), which leads to improved patient/client and community-oriented outcomes. Methods and Findings: This qualitative case study explores how four Canadian post-secondary institutions deliver IPE within their HASC professional education programmatic structures. Data were collected from institutional websites, publicly available IPE relevant records and documents, and interviews with coordinators and faculty/facilitators of IPE curriculum. Data were inductively analyzed to generate relevant themes, followed by a deductive analysis guided by the five accreditation standards domains identified in the Accreditation of Interprofessional Health Education (AIPHE) projects. Analyses of the data resulted in five attributes: 1) central administrative unit, 2) longitudinal and integrative program, 3) theoretically informed curriculum design, 4) student-centred pedagogy, and 5) patient/client-oriented approach. Conclusions: Using these attributes and guided by AIPHE’s accreditation standards domains, an organizational-curricular model for sustainable IPE is proposed, through which we assert that IPE reinforced through these organizational and curricular supports reflects successful programming, leading to patient/client-oriented outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22230/jripe.2023v13n1a351

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Azzam, M., Drynan, D., Fricke, M., Langlois, S., MacDonald, L., Vanier, M.-C., & Puvirajah, A.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education
Published
2023-09-28
Volume
13
Issue
1
ISSN
1916-7342 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387161393
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education (publishedVersion)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • University of Memphis
  • Indian Council of Agricultural Research
  • University of Toronto
  • Université de Montréal
  • Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
interprofessional education, interprofessional collaborative practice, accreditation standards, student-centered learning, higher education institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review