Cited by 356Innovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical EducationCompetency Development and Evaluation

The promise of competency-based education in the health professions for improving global health

Open access
Gruppen, Larry D, Mangrulkar, Rajesh S, Kolars, Joseph C·2012·Human Resources for Health

Abstract

Competency-based education (CBE) provides a useful alternative to time-based models for preparing health professionals and constructing educational programs. We describe the concept of 'competence' and 'competencies' as well as the critical curricular implications that derive from a focus on 'competence' rather than 'time'. These implications include: defining educational outcomes, developing individualized learning pathways, setting standards, and the centrality of valid assessment so as to reflect stakeholder priorities. We also highlight four challenges to implementing CBE: identifying the health needs of the community, defining competencies, developing self-regulated and flexible learning options, and assessing learners for competence. While CBE has been a prominent focus of educational reform in resource-rich countries, we believe it has even more potential to align educational programs with health system priorities in more resource-limited settings. Because CBE begins with a careful consideration of the competencies desired in the health professional workforce to address health care priorities, it provides a vehicle for integrating the health needs of the country with the values of the profession.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1478-4491-10-43

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruppen, L. D., Mangrulkar, R. S., & Kolars, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Gruppen, Larry D
Venue
Human Resources for Health
Published
2012-11-16
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
43-43
ISSN
1478-4491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150618433
Cited by
356
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Resources for Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
Keywords
competency-based education, health professions education, global health, competency definition, curriculum development, educational outcomes, competency assessment, student self-regulation, resource-limited settings, health workforce development, educational reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review