CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LONELINESS AMONG PORTUGUESE ADOLESCENTS

Open access
Neto, Félix·1992·Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal
DOI 10.2224/sbp.1992.20.1.15
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometrics characteristics of the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale with Portuguese adolescents. Adolescents from the public schools of Porto were presented with the UCLA Loneliness Scale, with the Self-Consciousness Scale, with the Clinical Self-Concept Inventory, and also responded to some additional questions. The Loneliness Scale proved satisfactory on various criteria with adolescents. No gender and sociocultural differences were found. A negative correlation was found with public self-consciousness, total self-concept and their dimensions, and self-rated physical attractiveness. Positive correlations were found with social anxiety and shyness. The psychological variables that best predicted loneliness were happiness, social anxiety, social acceptance and public self-consciousness. The factorial structure of the UCLA Loneliness Scale tended to support the multidimensionality of the scale. The obtained results provided evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the scale with Portuguese adolescents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2224/sbp.1992.20.1.15

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Neto F., 1989, Psicologia Cl'nica, 2, 65
  2. Russell, D. (1982). The measurement of loneliness. In L. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley.
  3. 10.1037//0022-3514.39.1.29 · DOI
  4. Vaz Serrra A., 1986, Psiquitria Cl'inica, 7, 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 117

Related

Metadata

Authors
Neto, F.
Corresponding author
Neto, Félix
ORCID
Neto, Félix
Venue
Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal
Publisher
Scientific Journal Publishers Ltd
Published
1992-01-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
15-21
ISSN
0301-2212 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2224/sbp.1992.20.1.15
OpenAlex
W1986285422
Cited by
117
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
loneliness, adolescents, Portuguese adolescents, UCLA Loneliness Scale, psychometric validation, self-concept, self-consciousness, social anxiety, shyness, social acceptance, happiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review