Cited by 1Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Treating executive dysfunction to improve insight in psychiatric disorders

Open access
Sarma Bardoloi, Prajjita·2018·Archives of Neurology and Neuro Disorders

Abstract

Executive dysfunction is not a primary psychiatric diagnosis in DSM 5, but it plays an important role in insight.This in turn determines treatment adherence, relapse prevention and functional improvement.This article shades light into importance of addressing executive dysfunction in treating acute mental illness, in order to improve overall outcome. Treating Executive Dysfunction to Improve Insight in Psychiatric Disorders

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22259/2638-504x.0102007

Cites

5 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A case report suggests guanfacine may be especially helpful in young adults with schizophrenia and a childhood history of abuse, and can improve insight.

    “a case report by Bardoloi (2020) suggests that guanfacine may be especially helpful in young adults with schizophrenia and a childhood history of abuse, and that it can improve insight”

    From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Bardoloi, 2018

    In “Improving Executive Function to Improve Insight in Acutely Ill Psychiatric Patients” (page unavailable), the paper proposes guanfacine as a possible way to improve insight. It does not report a case or say guanfacine is especially helpful for young adults with schizophrenia and a childhood history of abuse; its discussion of insight improvement is hypothetical. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rabinovici G, Stephens M, Possin K. Executive [1] dysfunction. CONTINUUM: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2015; 21(3, Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry): 646-659. http://ovidsp. ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC =Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00132979- 201506000-00011. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000 466658.05156. · DOI
  2. of cognitive disorders: A century of discoveries at yale. The Yale journal of biology and medicine. 2012; 85(1): 45-58. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/22461743.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarma Bardoloi, P.
Venue
Archives of Neurology and Neuro Disorders
Published
2018
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
27-30
ISSN
2638-504X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4327512046
Cited by
1
References
5
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Archives of Neurology and Neuro Disorders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
executive dysfunction, insight, mental illness, medication adherence, relapse prevention, functional outcome, acute mental illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review