Cited by 63Historical Geography and Geographical ThoughtSpatial and Cultural StudiesUrban Planning and Governance

Methodolatry and the Art of Measure

Open access
Mattern, Shannon·2013·Places Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22269/131105

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such approaches promote an instrumental rationality underpinning the notion that cities can be steered and managed through data levers and analytics and that urban issues can be solved through technical solutions.

    “As such, they promote an instrumental rationality that underpins the notion that cities can be steered and managed through a set of data levers and analytics and that urban issues can be solved through a range of technical solutions [8,23,24].”

    From The ethics of smart cities and urban science (2016) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattern, S.
Affiliations
The New School (US)
Corresponding author
Mattern, Shannon
Venue
Places Journal
Published
2013-11-05
Issue
2013
ISSN
  • 0731-0455 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-7798
OpenAlex
W269447386
Cited by
63
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Places (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Spatial and Cultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
Keywords
measurement, measurement theory, philosophy of measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review