The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 33 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Studying the Russian Language in China: Historical Background, Current State, Problems and Prospects
Open accessAbstract
The relevance of this research is underpinned by the importance of supporting and promoting the Russian language as an instrument of the Russian Federation’s humanitarian policy abroad, coupled with the strategic signi cance of the comprehensive partnership of our country with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Against the backdrop of rapidly intensifying Russian-Chinese relations, the training of highly quali ed Chinese specialists pro cient in Russian has emerged as a critical factor for e ective cooperation in economic, scienti c, technological and cultural spheres. In this context, the purpose of this article is to evaluate the current state of Russian language education in China. In this research the authors employed a combination of general scienti c and historical methods. The foundation was formed by the historical and problem-chronological methods and approaches. The history of Russian language learning in China spans over three centuries, commencing with the establishment of the Russian Language Institution in Beijing in 1708. A peak in popularity of Russian language study occurred in the 1950s, fueled by the Soviet-Chinese alliance relations, followed by a decline during the subsequent deterioration of bilateral ties. A renewed phase of growth began after China introduced its reform and opening-up policy in 1978, gaining further momentum with the development of the strategic partnership between Russia and China at the beginning of the 21st century. At present, the Russian language maintains a stable position as one of the most sought-after foreign languages in China, trailing only English and Japanese in terms of prevalence. The Chinese Association of Teachers of the Russian Language and Literature plays a leading role in consolidating the community of Russists and providing methodological support. The authors highlight several key challenges, including the persistence of outdated teaching methodologies prioritizing grammatical accuracy over communicative competence; a de cit of contemporary teaching materials; the geographical concentration of Russian language centers in Northeast China and the limited career prospects for Russian studies graduates lacking supplementary specializations. As a viable solution, the study proposes a wider adoption of the “Language + Specialty” model. This approach cultivates specialists who possess not only Russian language pro ciency but also competencies in speci c professional elds (e.g., economics, law, technical sciences), thereby better aligning with the demands of Russian-Chinese practical cooperation.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper traces Russian-language study in China from the 1708 Beijing Russian School to the present, showing recovery and growth after the 1978 reforms and especially under contemporary Russia–China strategic partnership. It identifies persistent problems—outdated grammar-focused teaching, scarce modern materials, geographic concentration in northeast China, and weak career prospects for Russian-only graduates—and proposes a “language plus specialty” training model.
Key findings
- Historically, Russian-language instruction in China began with the Russian School in Beijing in 1708, which lasted 154 years and was incorporated into the Tongwenguan in 1862; the popularity peak came in the 1950s, when by 1956 there were 1,960 Russian teachers and more than 13,000 Russian majors in Chinese universities.
- Currently Russian is China’s third most studied foreign language after English and Japanese; the annual number of Chinese students and schoolchildren studying Russian exceeds 80,000, with about 1,600 Russian teachers (twice the 2005 figure and three times the 2010 figure).
- Russian language and philology are taught as specialties in 181 Chinese higher education institutions, with about 36,000 students majoring in Russian (roughly six times the 2005 figure), about 20,000 studying Russian as a second foreign language, and over 400,000 schoolchildren in more than 280 schools learning Russian; Russian is compulsory in about 123 schools across 19 provinces.
- Key problems are outdated teaching methods focused on grammar rather than communication, lack of modern teaching materials, concentration of Russian-language centers in northeast China, and limited employment prospects for graduates without additional specialization; the proposed solution is broader adoption of the “language plus specialty” model in economics, law, and technical fields.
Methods
- The study uses historical and problem-chronological approaches, with quantitative data and comparative analysis of Russian-language study across different historical periods.
- It treats the field as a system of interconnected elements: educational institutions, legal/normative framework, professional language associations, and Russian-language centers.
- Evidence is drawn from cited Russian and Chinese scholarship, statistical data, bilateral agreements, and embassy reports, including unpublished 2015 and 2020 Russian embassy reports on the position of Russian in China.
Limitations
- Not stated in the paper.
- Evident from the text: the analysis relies on secondary statistical data and cited studies, including unpublished embassy reports, rather than primary surveys or original empirical data collection.
- Evident from the text: the paper does not discuss possible inconsistencies or reliability problems across the cited statistics, nor does it systematically evaluate the effectiveness of Russian-language centers beyond qualitative observations.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
38 Own result · 18 Sources not found · 11 Not checked yet · 9 Own interpretation · 2 Supported · 2 Partly supported · 2 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“По решению Цинского правительства в 1708 г. в Пекине была основана Школа русского языка, которая стала первым в истории Китая учебным заведением по подготовке специалистов по русскому языку (Ning, 2021, р. 22).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ning, 2021, р. 22 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction states that the Qing government established the Russian Language Institution in 1708 and that it was the first school in Chinese history to train Russian professionals. The passage does not say that the institution was founded in Beijing, so that location is not verified by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Среди них на вершине рейтингов находятся Пекинский университет иностранных языков, Пекинский университет, Столичный педагогический университет, Гуандунский университет иностранных языков, Шанхайский университет иностранных языков, Даляньский университет иностранных языков, Цзилиньский университет, Хэйлунцзянский университет и др. 9”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [9] Ganshina, G., & Tsvyk, A. (2016). Promotion of Russian language in China as a tool of cultural diplomacy of the Russian Federation. In ICADCE 2016: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (pp. 1285–1289). Zhengzhou: Atlantis Press China. EDN: XHGQUH sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section III reports how many Chinese universities teach Russian and mentions Beijing University of Foreign Languages in connection with a publication, but it does not identify top-ranked institutions. Searches for the listed universities and university rankings found no passage supporting the list or its ranking; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Помимо этого, важным фактором, способствовавшим росту интереса к изучению русского языка в Китае, стал проведенный в 2009 г. «Год русского языка» в рамках проектов «Годы национальных языков» в России и Китае.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“К 1952 г. в общей сложности в 36 вузах и техникумах были созданы отделения русского языка (Liu, 2017, p. 1).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Liu, 2017, p. 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Их целью являлась координация учебных планов по подготовке специалистов в соответствии с требованиями рыночной экономики, а также с учетом тенденций в торгово-экономическом сотрудничестве между Россией и Китаем.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“С началом «культурной революции» и ухудшением отношений между СССР и КНР русистика в Китае пережила непростой период.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В начале 1990-х гг.развитие двустороннего сотрудничества между Россией и Китаем и расширение масштабов торговли КНР со странами Содружества Независимых Государств (СНГ) привели к быстрому росту спроса на преподавателей русского языка.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Следующий период роста интереса к изучению русского языка пришелся на конец 1980-х гг.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“В этот период в Шанхайском университете иностранных языков был открыт первый в Китае диссертационный совет, наделенный правом присуждения ученых степеней в области русского языка и литературы (Лю, 2012, с. 256).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Лю, 2012, с. 256
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В 2003-2005 гг.в китайских университетах были проведены реформы, направленные на совершенствование системы преподавания русского языка.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
- It may state two separate claims as one. 32
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Ассоциация была официально основана 3 мая 1981 г. в Шанхае.В общей сложности в ней состояло 1300 членов (Ning, 2021, p. 27).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Ning, 2021, p. 27 source
Section 2.3 identifies the association as the China Russian Language Teaching and Research Association and states that it was formally established in Shanghai on May 3, 1981, with 1,300 members. The paper does not use the acronym KAPRYAL, but the founding details attributed to it match exactly. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“После Синьхайской революции в Китае под влиянием распространения и растущего влияния марксизма в мире после основания Советского Союза как в партии Гоминьдан, так и в Коммунистической партии Китая активно приступили к подготовке специалистов со знанием русского языка, осознавая важность связей с СССР (Ning, 2021, р. 23).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Ning, 2021, р. 23 source
The Introduction states that, following the 1911 Revolution and the founding of the Soviet Union, both the KMT and the Communist Party recognized the importance of ties with the Soviet Union and devoted themselves to training Russian-speaking professionals. This directly supports the attributed paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“По данным китайских исследователей, к 2005 г. около 6500 студентов в 68 университетах по всему Китаю изучали русский язык в качестве основной специальности, количество преподавателей русского языка достигало 700 человек (Ning, 2021).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites Ning, 2021 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage on university Russian programs (paper pp. 20–37; page not specified in our copy) gives later figures of 168 universities, approximately 26,000 undergraduate students, and 1,600 teachers. Searches for 2005, 6,500 students, 68 universities, and 700 teachers found no passage reporting the claimed 2005 figures. The later figures do not contradict a claim about 2005. (LLM, conf=0.76)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“История изучения русского языка в Китае насчитывает более трех столетий, начиная с основания в 1708 г.Русской школы в Пекине.”
- Also stated in: § История изучения русского языка в Китае · plain
“История изучения русского языка в Китае восходит к началу XVIII в.По решению Цинского правительства в 1708 г. в Пекине была основана Школа русского языка, которая стала первым в истории Китая учебным заведением по подготовке специалистов по русскому языку (Ning, 2021, р. 22).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Abstract
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ning, 2021, р. 22 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction states that Russian language education in China has a history of more than 300 years and that the Qing government established the Russian Language Institution in 1708. It does not state that the institution was founded in Beijing; its later merger into the Imperial University of Peking does not establish its location in 1708. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § История изучения русского языка в Китае · plain
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“С наступлением XXI в. начался новый этап в области изучения русского языка в Китае.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“К 1956 г. в китайских университетах насчитывалось 1960 преподавателей русского языка и более 13 тысяч студентов, изучающих русский язык в качестве основной специальности (Ning, 2021, p. 25).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ning, 2021, p. 25 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Только с 1978 г., когда правительство КНР объявило о старте «политики реформ и открытости», культурные и образовательные обмены с СССР начали постепенно восстанавливаться.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Это учебное заведение просуществовало 154 года (Ван, 2018, с. 577).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ван, 2018, с. 577
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“С постепенной нормализацией советско-китайских отношений стали восстанавливаться двусторонние контакты, прежде всего в культурной и образовательной сферах, а также возобновились академические обмены.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В то время уроки русского языка проводились уже и в начальных, и средних школах, а также в вузах по всей стране.Также в СССР проходили стажировку студенты из Китая.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Согласно статистическим данным, до образования КНР в Китае насчитывалось 13 школ, в которых были созданы отделения русского языка (Fu, 1988, р. 48).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Fu, 1988, р. 48
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В январе 1980 г. девять вузов, включая Пекинский университет иностранных языков, Пекинский университет, Хэйлунцзянский университет и др., сформировали подготовительную группу для КАПРЯЛ.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Насчитывается около 1,6 тыс.преподавателей русского языка (в два раза больше, чем в 2005 г., и в три раза больше, чем в 2010 г.) (Горячев, Захаров, 2024, с. 87).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Горячев, Захаров, 2024, с. 87
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Число студентов, изучающих русский язык, составляет около 36 тысяч человек (примерно в шесть раз больше, чем в 2005 г.) (Горячев, Захаров, 2024, с. 90).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Горячев, Захаров, 2024, с. 90
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Русский язык и филология преподаются в качестве специальностей в 181 высшем учебном заведении Китая (по сравнению с 2005 г. их число увеличилось почти в три раза) 8 .”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Ganshina, E. I. (2015b). Russian-Chinese humanitarian cooperation in 1990s. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, (1), 88–97. (In Russian). EDN: TMGEBH
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Штаб-квартира Ассоциации находится в Пекинском университете, президентом Ассоциации является Нин Ци, проректор Пекинского университета.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Согласно статистическим данным, в 2010 г. специальность «Русский язык» была открыта уже в 103 китайских университетах 4 .Около 12 тысяч студентов изучали русский язык в качестве основной специальности.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Chen, W. (2017). Problems of teaching Russian language in China at the present stage. Pravo i Praktika, (4), 287–295. (In Russian). EDN: YKUUID
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ассоциация является частью Всекитайского общества по изучению России, Восточной Европы и Центральной Азии, но пользуется широкой автономией.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Также необходимо отметить, что студенты, прошедшие обучение в вузах по специальности «Русский язык», часто сталкиваются с проблемами трудоустройства после окончания университета.Поскольку они не имеют квалификации в других областях, их профессиональные компетенции весьма ограничены (они, как правило, работают преподавателями русского языка или переводчиками).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ассоциация объединяет 100 институтов русского языка, действующих в рамках ведущих университетов Китая.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В этом центре работают российские преподаватели, а обучение русскому языку осуществляется в том числе с использованием российской учебной литературы.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Данная Ассоциация, консолидирующая сообщество специалистов по русскому языку в Китае, систематически оказывает методическую поддержку преподавателям русского языка, организует курсы повышения квалификации, конференции, круглые столы, издает журналы «Русский язык в Китае», «Русский язык в средней школе» и др.(Горячев, Захаров, 2024, с. 91).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Горячев, Захаров, 2024, с. 91
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Помимо центра русского языка при Университете МГУ -ППИ курсы русского языка организованы на платной основе в Российском культурном центре (РКЦ) в Пекине.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Данная Ассоциация консолидирует сообщество русистов в Китае и обеспечивает систематическую методическую поддержку преподавателей русского языка.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Многие китайские преподаватели делают упор на изучение лексики и грамматики, в то время как развитию коммуникативных навыков уделяется недостаточное внимание.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“С нормализацией отношений между СССР и КНР в конце 1980-х гг.и развитием российско-китайских связей в 1990-х гг.число изучающих русский язык к началу XXI в. увеличилось и в дальнейшем продолжило рост.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Согласно статистическим данным, ситуация с изучением русского языка в Китае представляется весьма неплохой, принимая во внимание тот факт, что в китайском обществе нет необходимости изучать иностранные языки без практических целей трудоустройства (Белоусова, 2024, с. 13).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Белоусова, 2024, с. 13
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В апреле-мае 2024 г. такие мероприятия прошли в Пекинском университете иностранных языков, Пекинском педагогическом университете и др.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Подготовка по русскому языку также осуществляется на базе центров русского языка, которые действуют под эгидой Фонда «Русский мир» и партнерской сети Государственного института русского языка имени А. С. Пушкина или созданы при участии российских высших учебных заведений на базе китайских вузов.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Русский язык как специальность преподавался в 168 университетах в 2020 г., среднегодовое число студентов составляло около 26 тыс.человек.20 тыс.студентов также изучали русский язык в качестве второго иностранного языка 6 .”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Fu, K. (1988). The history of foreign language education in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Press.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Как отмечает российский исследователь Е. Ю. Андреева, основной проблемой преподавания русского языка в Китае является использование устаревших методов обучения (Андреева, 2022, с. 172).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Андреева, 2022, с. 172
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Изучение русского языка является обязательным для всех китайских студентов университета, которых насчитывается более 1,5 тысячи человек (Горячев, Захаров, 2024, с. 90).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Горячев, Захаров, 2024, с. 90
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Многие учебники были подготовлены более полувека назад и неоднократно переиздавались в 2000-х гг.В них содержится устаревшая лексика, которая совершенно не адаптирована к современным коммуникативным реалиям (Ли, Ван, 2023, с. 87).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ли, Ван, 2023, с. 87
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Они полностью подконтрольны китайским высшим учебным заведениям как в определении кадровой политики, так и в части наполнения учебных программ, финансирование также поступает из китайских источников.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В то же время густонаселенные и более экономически развитые южные и центральные регионы отстают от северо-востока Китая как по темпам, так и по масштабам распространения русского языка.Количество изучающих русский язык в этих районах значительно ниже.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“При университете действует центр тестирования русскому языку, что позволяет студентам сдавать экзамены на уровень владения и получать соответствующие сертификаты по итогам аттестации.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Таким образом, наряду с основными центрами обучения русскому языку на базе высших учебных заведений и образовательных организаций особую роль играет деятельность Китайской ассоциации преподавателей русского языка и литературы.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В то же время филиалы этих курсов в других регионах Китая отсутствуют.Таким образом, в РКЦ обучаются преимущественно жители китайской столицы и ее окрестностей.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Благодаря деятельности Школы были заложены основы систематического изучения русского языка в Китае, что позволило пекинским властям накопить значительный опыт в организации образовательных языковых учреждений.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Это был важный шаг в укреплении позиций русского языка в Китае.Соглашение охватывало основные направления сотрудничества в области изучения русского языка в Китае и китайского языка в России.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“С укреплением двусторонних связей между Россией и Китаем в экономической и гуманитарной областях возрастает необходимость в подготовке высококвалифицированных китайских и российских специалистов со знанием русского и китайского языков соответственно.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Введение
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The development of a comprehensive strategic partnership with China, including in the humanitarian sphere, is one of Russia's main foreign policy priorities.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Поддержка и продвижение русского языка являются ключевыми элементами гуманитарной политики Российской Федерации за рубежом, способствующими формированию позитивного образа страны в мире, содействию ее научнотехнологического и социально-экономического развития, а также привлечению высококвалифицированных специалистов 1 .Это важнейший инструмент культурной дипломатии России (Цвык, 2018b, с. 139).”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Введение
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [1] Andreeva, E. Yu. (2022). The Russian language as a tool for promotion of the Russian World (on the material of the People’s Republic of China). Soczial’no-Politicheskie Nauki, 12(4), 169–174. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2022-12-4-169-174; EDN: KTZVIK source
- Not matchedcites Цвык, 2018b, с. 139
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В этом контексте обучение по таким программам будет способствовать подготовке большего числа высококвалифицированных специалистов, владеющих русским языком, и будет соответствовать запросам российско-китайского сотрудничества.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Другим важным фактором является то, что на фоне развития российскокитайского сотрудничества перспективы трудоустройства для выпускников вузов, владеющих русским языком, возрастают.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“В результате большинство выпускников не обладают способностью использовать свою языковую подготовку ни для коммуникативного взаимодействия, ни в профессиональных целях.Они обладают обширными теоретическими знаниями, но им недостает практического опыта.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > Вместо заключения: проблемы и перспективы изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Во многом это обусловлено возможностью его сдачи в рамках единого государственного экзамена для выпускников школ (Гаокао) и более легкими по сравнению с английским языком заданиями.”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The development of a comprehensive strategic partnership with China, including in the humanitarian sphere, is one of Russia's main foreign policy priorities.
“Развитие всеобъемлющего стратегического партнерства с Китайской Народной Республикой (КНР), в том числе в гуманитарной сфере, представляет собой один из главных внешнеполитических приоритетов России.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Proficiency in Russian by entrepreneurs and officials from the PRC substantially simplifies interaction between Russia and China and increases the effectiveness of negotiations.
“Владение русским языком предпринимателями и чиновниками из КНР существенно упрощает взаимодействие между двумя сторонами, повышает эффективность ведения переговоров.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the Chinese education sector there is growing interest in learning Russian, stimulated by student and academic exchanges.
“В китайском образовательном секторе наблюдается растущий интерес к изучению русского языка, стимулируемый студенческими и академическими обменами.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Getting higher education in Russian higher education institutions is gaining popularity among Chinese applicants, especially those planning careers in international projects with Russian participation or in spheres of most active cooperation with Russia.
“Получение высшего образования в российских высших учебных заведениях набирает популярность среди китайских абитуриентов, особенно среди тех, кто планирует строить карьеру в международных проектах с российским участием или в сферах наиболее активного сотрудничества с Россией.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Among the Chinese population there is significant interest in Russian cultural heritage.
“Среди китайского населения наблюдается значительный интерес к русскому культурному наследию, что способствует более глубокому пониманию китайцами традиций и обычаев народов России.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > История изучения русского языка в Китае
“(Цвык, 2018b, с. 37)”
§ Изучение русского языка в Китае: история, текущее состояние, проблемы и перспективы > References
“Цвык Г. И. Культурная дипломатия в современных международных отношениях (на примере России и Китая) // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Всеобщая история. 2018b. Т. 10, № 2. С. 135-144.”
Citations
Cites
CULTURAL DIPLOMACY IN CURRENT INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF RUSSIA AND CHINA)
Tsvyk, G. I. (2018) · RUDN Journal of World History · doi:10.22363/2312-8127-2018-10-2-135-144 · Cited by 4
Self-citationНОВАЯ МОДЕЛЬ ПОДГОТОВКИ СПЕЦИАЛИСТОВ В ОБУЧЕНИИ РУССКОМУ ЯЗЫКУ В КИТАЕ В НОВУЮ ЭПОХУ
Ло, С. (2020) · Pedagogical Review · doi:10.23951/2307-6127-2020-1-87-92 · Cited by 4
The interaction of foreign languages and society: a review of Russian language education in China
Ning, Q. (2021) · Onomázein · doi:10.7764/onomazein.ne9.02 · Cited by 4
TEACHING RUSSIAN IN CHINA: HISTORY AND PROBLEMS
Wenge, L., & Liunuo, W. (2023) · Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Образование. Педагогические науки · doi:10.14529/ped230307 · Cited by 3
Andreeva, E. Y. (2022) · Sociopolitical Sciences · doi:10.33693/2223-0092-2022-12-4-169-174 · Cited by 2
FACTORS OF MOTIVATIONAL-VALUE ATTITUDE TO LEARNING THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN CHINA
Yuan, C., & Olesova, A. P. (2023) · Современные проблемы науки и образования · doi:10.17513/spno.32671 · Cited by 2
Promotion of Russian Language in China. As a Tool of Cultural Diplomacy of the Russian Federation
Ganshina, G., & Tsvyk, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education · doi:10.2991/icadce-16.2016.313 · Cited by 1
БРИКС и изучение русского языка в странах Глобального Юга
Алексеевич, Г. Ю., Захаров, В. Ф., Омельченко, Е. А., & Александровна, Ш. А. (2024) · Центр "ЭТНОСФЕРА" eBooks · doi:10.37492/978-5-93125-196-7 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Datsyshen, V. G. (2013). Learning Russian in China in the late 19th — early 20th century. Obshhestvo i Gosudarstvo v Kitae, 43(1), 577–586. (In Russian). EDN: XYXLIQ
- Fu, K. (1988). The history of foreign language education in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Press.
- Gao, H. & Yan, D. (2023). E yu zhuan ye xue sheng jiu ye jing zheng li pli yu yan jiu. Qi qi ha er shi fan gao deng zhuan ke que xiao que bao [Research on the cultivation of employment competitiveness of studying Russian major students]. Qi qi ha er shi fan gao deng zhuan ke que xiao que bao [Journal of Qiqihar Teachers College], (6), 96–99. (In Chinese).
- Liu, H. (2022). High-quality development of Russian language education in Chinese universities in the new era. Philological Class, 27(2), 126–131. (In Russian). EDN: AWLPQK
- Wang, L. (2018). Teaching Russian language in China: Historical and methodological experience of formation. Pedagogical Journal, 8(5A), 574–582. (In Russian). EDN: ZCWMOD
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Общество политика экономика право · doi:10.24158/pep.2026.7.1
Aulina, K. K., Nuryatin, M. H. M. H. P. A., & Nasuha, A. F. (2026) · Research and Development in Education (RaDEn) · doi:10.22219/raden.v6i2.44689
Advancing the Russian Language in China as a Strategic Asset: Legal Basis and Economic Potential
Klimova, I. I., Andreeva, E. Y., Makarova, E. B., Efimova, N. A., & Bryukhacheva, Y. A. (2026) · Economics taxes & law · doi:10.26794/1999-849x-2026-19-5-179-186
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsvyk, I. V., & Tsvyk, G. I.
- Affiliations
- Moscow Aviation Institute (RU)
- Diplomatic Academy of MGIMO of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (RU)
- Venue
- Vestnik RUDN. International Relations
- Published
- 2025-12-31
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 624-634
- ISSN
- 2313-0660 (ISSN-L)
- 2313-0679
- OpenAlex
- W7118016500
- Semantic Scholar
- 58209f6dd10cda89744e6d9350cd12a33a095410
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vestnik RUDN International Relations (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Keywords
- Russian language teaching, Russia-China relations, Russian language teaching methodology, communicative competence, teaching materials shortage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
