The DOI matches its Crossref record.
De saberes e de territórios: diversidade e emancipação a partir da experiência Latino-Americano
Abstract
O artigo problematiza a relação entre saberes e territórios pondo em questão a idéia eurocêntrica de conhecimento universal. Com isso o autor pretende: (1) retirar o caráter unidirecional que os europeus impuseram a essa ideia (eurocentrismo) e (2) afirmarque as diferentes matrizes de racionalidade constituidas a partir de diferentes lugares são passíveis de serem universalizadas, o que nos obriga a considerar os processos por meio dos quais os conhecimentos podem dialogar, se relacionar. Enfim, o que se visa é um diálogo de saberes que supere a colonialidade do saber e do poder.AbstractThis article renders problematic the relation between knowledges and territories, by putting in question the eurocentric idea of universal knowledge. In so doing the author intends: (1) remove the unidirectional character Europeans have impose to this idea (eurocentrism), and (2) arguing that different matrixes of rationality constituted through distinct places are liable to be universalized. This can obligate.us to consider processes through which knowledges can dialogue, construct relationships. Finally, it aims a dialogue of knowledges to overcome the coloniality of knowledge and power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Porto-Gonçalves (2009) reminds us that in any territory, multiple forms of territoriality always coexist, each with its own dynamics and meanings.”
From Modes of production during the Inka Imperial Period (1420–1535 AD) and the Early Colonial Period (1535–1660 AD) in the Jujuy Valley, Argentina (2024) · cites this paper as Porto-Gonçalves (2009)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- VAN COTT, Donna Lee. 2000. Thefriendly liquidation of the past: The politics of diversity in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vaquer, J. M., Llapur, L., & Stokes, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2024.1450968
Metadata
- Authors
- Porto-Gonçalves, C. W.
- Venue
- GEOgraphia
- Published
- 2010-02-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 1517-7793
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
