Cited by 0Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsAgricultural economics and policiesAgricultural risk and resilience

Impacts of the global fertilizer crisis in Africa: insights from country-level studies

Open access
Njoroge, Samuel, Mugi-Ngenga, Esther, Chivenge, Pauline, Boulal, Hakim, Pali, Pamela, Zingore, Shamie, Majumdar, Kaushik·2026·International Food and Agribusiness Management Review

Abstract

The most recent disruption of the global fertilizer supply due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict resulted in a global fertilizer crisis characterized by unprecedented price hikes and shortages. Africa relies heavily on fertilizer imports to satisfy its consumption needs and was severely affected by the fertilizer crisis. We used a comparative case study approach based on primary and secondary data to evaluate the effects of the fertilizer crisis and the response of various stakeholders at country, intra-regional, and micro-level (smallholder farmers) across fertilizer supply chains in Morocco, Ghana, and Kenya. Local fertilizer prices increased two to threefold, with associated reductions in accessibility, availability, and use of fertilizers, with significant variability among and within countries. At the macro-level, government-funded subsidies were a common crisis mitigation response across countries, while other responses were country-specific. Farm-level responses and coping strategies included reductions in the quantities of fertilizer applied and in the cropping area, which were expected to reduce crop productivity. Cases were also observed where households used savings and credit to purchase fertilizers or traveled longer distances to access fertilizers. This study provides critical insights into strategies for mitigating the impact of future fertilizer supply disruptions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22434/ifamr.1370

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Njoroge, S., Mugi-Ngenga, E., Chivenge, P., Boulal, H., Pali, P., Zingore, S., & Majumdar, K.
Affiliations
  • African Plant Nutrition Institute (MA)
  • International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (KE)
Venue
International Food and Agribusiness Management Review
Published
2026-02-24
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
389-420
ISSN
  • 1096-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2448
OpenAlex
W7131368224
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
Keywords
fertilizer prices, COVID-19 pandemic, Russian invasion of Ukraine, fertilizer subsidies, smallholder farmers, farmer coping strategies, crop productivity, Africa, Morocco, Ghana, Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review