The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HACIA UNA CARTOGRAFÍA DE LA CRIANZA: DOMESTICIDAD Y DOMESTICACIÓN EN COMUNIDADES ANDINAS
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, people have cultivated-and continue to cultivate-in these poorly developed soils.This has been possible because, over time, they have established relationships with soil-earth in agricultural contexts through a range of practices aimed at stimulating and enhancing its vital potentials for the creation of spaces of crianza -nurture, care and cultivation- (Grillo, 1994;Lema, 2014).”
From In defense of the soils. A hybrid perspective of archaeology of agriculture in the Andean high valleys (Catamarca, Argentina) (2025) · cites this paper as Lema, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- GLEASON, Kathryn. To bound and to cultivate: an introduction to the archaeology of gardens and fields In: MILLER, Naomi; GLEASON, Kathryn (Org.). The archaeology of gardens and fields. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994. p. 1-24.
- HILLMAN, Gordon; DAVIES, M. Stuart. Measured domestication rates in wild wheats and barley under primitive cultivation, and their archaeological implications. Journal of World Prehistory, vol. 4, n. 2, p. 157-222, 1990.
- HODDER, Ian. Theory and practice in archaeology. Londres: Routledge, 1992.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mader, C., Godde, P., Behl, M., Binder, C., Hägele, E., Isla, J., Leceta, F., Lyons, M., Marsh, E., Odenthal, R., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2024.1328315 · Cited by 18
Taddei Salinas, M. L. (2025) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2025.1622077
Metadata
- Authors
- Lema, V. S.
- Venue
- Espaço Ameríndio
- Published
- 2014-06-26
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59
- ISSN
- 1982-6524
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
