The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Data and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indigenous Data Sovereignty draws on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which reaffirms the rights of Indigenous Peoples to control data about their peoples, lands, and resources5,6.”
From Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“UNDRIP asserts Indigenous Peoples’ rights and interests in data and their authority to control their data.”
From Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wiessner S (1999). Rights and status of indigenous peoples: a global comparative and international legal analysis. Harvard Human Rights Journal 12:57.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., et al. (2020) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2020-043 · Cited by 1,408
Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures
Carroll, S. R., Herczog, E., Hudson, M., Russell, K., & Stall, S. (2021) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0 · Cited by 483
Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations
Carroll, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A. (2019) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2019-031 · Cited by 264
Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Data: a contribution toward Indigenous Research Sovereignty
Hudson, M., Carroll, S. R., Anderson, J., Blackwater, D., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Cummins, J., David-Chavez, D., Fernandez, A., Garba, I., Hiraldo, D., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2023.1173805 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, M.
- Venue
- Indigenous Data Sovereignty
- Publisher
- ANU Press
- Published
- 2016-11-14
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
