Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations
Open accessAbstract
Data have become the new global currency, and a powerful force in making decisions and wielding power. As the world engages with open data, big data reuse, and data linkage, what do data-driven futures look like for communities plagued by data inequities? Indigenous data stakeholders and non-Indigenous allies have explored this question over the last three years in a series of meetings through the Research Data Alliance (RDA). Drawing on RDA and other gatherings, and a systematic scan of literature and practice, we consider possible answers to this question in the context of Indigenous peoples vis-á-vis two emerging concepts: Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous data governance. Specifically, we focus on the data challenges facing Native nations and the intersection of data, tribal sovereignty, and power. Indigenous data sovereignty is the right of each Native nation to govern the collection, ownership, and application of the tribe’s data. Native nations exercise Indigenous data sovereignty through the interrelated processes of Indigenous data governance and decolonizing data. This paper explores the implications of Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous data governance for Native nations and others. We argue for the repositioning of authority over Indigenous data back to Indigenous peoples. At the same time, we recognize that there are significant obstacles to rebuilding effective Indigenous data systems and the process will require resources, time, and partnerships among Native nations, other governments, and data agents.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper argues that Indigenous data sovereignty (IDS) is the inherent right of Native nations to govern the collection, ownership, and application of their data, exercised through Indigenous data governance (IDG) and decolonizing data. Drawing on Research Data Alliance meetings, a literature/practice scan, and US case studies, it recommends repositioning authority over Indigenous data to Indigenous peoples while acknowledging resource, capacity, and partnership obstacles.
Key findings
- IDS is defined as the right of Indigenous peoples and tribes to govern collection, ownership, and application of their own data; IDG is “decision making” and “the power to decide how and when Indigenous data are gathered, analysed, accessed and used.” Native nations exercise IDS through interrelated processes of IDG and decolonizing data.
- Data dependency is sustained by a paradox of scarcity and abundance: extensive data are collected about Indigenous peoples/nations but rarely by or for them. The 2010 US Census undercounted American Indian/Alaska Native peoples at 4.9%, the highest undercount of any racial/ethnic population; the Census also captures self-identification, not tribal citizenship.
- Case studies show governance mechanisms: NCAI’s pilot with five tribes; Pueblo of Laguna ran its own census with proprietary software owned by the tribe; Swinomish climate initiative retained complete ownership and prior review/approval; Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board has regulated research since 1996 with a 12-step approval process and data turnover; NAGPRA repatriated nearly 60,000 human remains and over 1.7 million funerary objects, with penalties up to 12 months prison and $100,000 fine.
- Recommendations emerged from 27 gatherings: tribal rightsholders must be involved in every recommendation, non-Indigenous entities also have roles, and the C.A.R.E. Principles (collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility, ethics) are intended alongside FAIR.
Methods
- Conceptual/policy analysis combining definitions, case studies, and recommendations; draws on Research Data Alliance plenaries and other meetings and a systematic scan of literature and practice.
- Qualitative analysis of participant observation data from 27 gatherings in the United States and at RDA plenaries, covering data governance mechanisms, tribal data governance opportunities/challenges, and stakeholder roles.
- Case studies of tribal and non-tribal entities, including the NCAI Tribal Data Capacity Project with five tribes, Pueblo of Laguna, Swinomish Tribe, Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board, Urban Indian Health Institute, Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center, NCAI resolution KAN-18-011, and international IDS networks.
Limitations
- The paper states its recommendations are not exhaustive, are nonlinear, and are not a step-by-step process; tribal rightsholders can decide their level of engagement based on cultural fit, vision, capacity, and resources.
- The paper states there are significant obstacles to rebuilding effective Indigenous data systems, requiring resources, time, and partnerships among Native nations, other governments, and data agents.
- Evident from the text: the analysis is largely US-focused with selected case studies and qualitative participant observation, rather than a systematic outcome evaluation; international examples are illustrative.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 38 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
The sharing of ideas, actions, and best practices for reclaiming and decolonizing data is occurring in the United States and elsewhere, particularly in Canada and Australasia.
“The sharing of ideas, actions, and best practices for reclaiming and decolonizing data is occurring in the United States and elsewhere, particularly in Canada and Australasia”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016 source
The section “Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution” (page unavailable) describes US tribes developing data-sovereignty best practices and identifies Indigenous data governance in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. It does not establish that ideas and practices are already being shared across those places; instead, it says tribes still operate in silos and calls for international partnerships. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Rainie et al. 2017c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kukutai and Taylor 2016 source
- Findingcitation
In 2014, the Swinomish Tribe engaged in a pilot study to evaluate climate change impacts along their shorelines and on the health of their people.
“In 2014, the tribe engaged in a pilot study to evaluate climate change impacts along their shorelines and on the health of their people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
- Findingreasoning
The Swinomish Tribe and the other Native nation are named as co-authors in all related publications, as opposed to an individual tribal leader or staff member.
“The tribes also are named as co-authors in all related publications (as opposed to an individual tribal leader or staff member)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
- Findingcitation
The NNHRRB has functioned to regulate, monitor, and control research within the Navajo Nation since 1996.
“The Board has functioned to regulate, monitor, and control research within the Navajo Nation since 1996 (Navajo Nation 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Navajo Nation 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The Swinomish Tribe examined key community health concerns and projected impacts to habitat and shoreline archaeological sites.
“The tribe examined key community health concerns and projected impacts to habitat and shoreline archaeological sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
- Findingcitation
In June 2018, the National Congress of American Indians passed a resolution (KAN-18-011) in "Support of US Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Inclusion of Tribes in the Development of Tribal Data Governance Principles".
“Finally, in June 2018, the National Congress of American Indians, the largest tribal membership organization in the US, passed a resolution (KAN-18–011) in “Support of US Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Inclusion of Tribes in the Development of Tribal Data Governance Principles” (NCAI 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCAI 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The Pueblo of Laguna's software was effective in achieving a high census response rate across their reservation.
“Their software was effective in achieving a high census response rate across their reservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCAIPRC, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The Pueblo of Laguna was the only tribe of the five to plan and execute their own census or survey, as opposed to hiring external consultants.
“For example, the Pueblo of Laguna was the only tribe of the five to plan and execute their own census or survey (as opposed to hiring external consultants) (NCAIPRC, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCAIPRC, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Since 2007, after a Proclamation by the Swinomish Indian Senate, the Swinomish Tribe has been studying the effects of climate change on their reservation.
“Since 2007, after a Proclamation by the Swinomish Indian Senate, the tribe has been studying the effects of climate change on their reservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
- Findingcitation
The NCAI resolution is the first collective action and statement in the US to support the efforts of tribes to exercise Indigenous data sovereignty and governance, the efforts to advocate for and provide research on Indigenous data sovereignty, and support the inclusion of tribes in the development of any broad principles of tribal data sovereignty and/or governance.
“This is the first collective action and statement in the US to “support the efforts of tribes to exercise Indigenous data sovereignty and governance, the efforts to advocate for and provide research on Indigenous data sovereignty, and support the inclusion of tribes in the development of any broad principles of tribal data sovereignty and/or governance” (NCAI 2018, p. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCAI 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Since NAGPRA's passage, nearly 60,000 individual human remains and over 1.7 million funerary objects have been repatriated to Indigenous communities.
“Since NAGPRA’s passage, nearly 60,000 individual human remains and over 1.7 million funerary objects have been repatriated to Indigenous communities (National Park Service 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites National Park Service 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The Pueblo of Laguna engaged in a unique partnership agreement with the University of New Mexico to develop a proprietary software program used by the tribe's census enumerators.
“The Pueblo engaged in a unique partnership agreement with the University of New Mexico to develop a proprietary software program used by the tribe’s census enumerators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCAIPRC, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
Through the merging of connections leveraged through the USIDSN's international relationships and with researchers at the RDA, the founders of the existing nation-state based networks joined to create the International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group at the Research Data Alliance.
“Through the merging of connections leveraged through the USIDSN’s international relationships and with researchers at the RDA, the founders of the existing nation-state based networks joined to create the International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group at the Research Data Alliance (RDA IDS Group; rd-alliance.org).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board (NNHRRB) is an example of an effective tribal research code.
“An example of an effective tribal research code is the Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board (NNHRRB).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Navajo Nation 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center is an example of an entity decolonizing data and pursuing IDG partnerships between a non-profit and tribes.
“The Albuquerque Indian Health Board’s Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center is an example of an entity decolonizing data and pursuing IDG partnerships between a non-profit and tribes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
There have been few pieces of legislation since NAGPRA with the same sweeping mandate for compliance by non-Indigenous entities with respect to Indigenous data.
“and there have been few pieces of legislation since with the same sweeping mandate for compliance by non-Indigenous entities with respect to Indigenous data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By these accounts, NAGPRA is an effective data governance mechanism.
“By these accounts, NAGPRA is an effective data governance mechanism”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Pueblo of Laguna's partnership agreement with the University of New Mexico is an example of an effective data governance mechanism that secures external expertise to develop cutting edge technology on tribal terms with tribal money for tribal purposes.
“This is an example of an effective data governance mechanism that secures external expertise to develop cutting edge technology on tribal terms with tribal money (i.e. grant money obtained by the tribe) for tribal purposes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The NCAI resolution sets the initial agenda for both pantribal and Native nation movement toward IDS via IDG.
“The resolution sets the initial agenda for both pantribal and Native nation movement toward IDS via IDG.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Federal laws like NAGPRA provide a strong legal mechanism requiring external institutions that receive federal funding to return possession and control of precious tribal data, including cultural items, human remains, funerary objects, and other sacred objects unlawfully obtained from Native American homelands.
“Federal laws like the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Action of 1990 (NAGPRA) provide a strong legal mechanism requiring external institutions that receive federal funding to return possession and control of precious tribal data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Tribal legislation and tribal research bodies, such as tribal institutional review boards, are governance mechanisms that wield some measure of influence over governance of Indigenous data.
“Tribal legislation and tribal research bodies, such as tribal institutional review boards, are governance mechanisms that wield some measure of influence over governance of Indigenous data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Penalties for non-compliance with NAGPRA are up to 12 months of prison time and a $100,000 fine.
“Penalties for non-compliance are steep–up to 12 months of prison time and a $100,000 fine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The sharing of ideas, actions, and best practices for reclaiming and decolonizing data has not happened organically; rather, a persistent community of practice has been steering the course.
“However, it has not happened organically; rather, a persistent community of practice has been steering the course.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The RDA plenaries have facilitated the expansion of the IDS discussion beyond North America and Australasia to include Indigenous peoples in the Global South and Asia.
“The RDA plenaries have facilitated the expansion of the IDS discussion beyond North America and Australasia to include Indigenous peoples in the Global South and Asia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
- May combine two claims. 16
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSuch sharing requires a degree of goodwill and buy-in, especially for Indigenous peoples for whom the 'sharing' of data often looks much more like 'taking'.
“Such sharing requires a degree of goodwill and buy-in, especially for Indigenous peoples for whom the ‘sharing’ of data often looks much more like ‘taking” (Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationThe C.A.R.E. Principles of Indigenous Data Governance (collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility, ethics) are intended for adoption and implementation by international research and policy organizations in addition to and alongside the FAIR Principles.
“The C.A.R.E. Principles of Indigenous Data Governance (collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility, ethics) are intended for adoption and implementation by international research and policy organizations in addition to and alongside the FAIR Principles”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilkinson et al. 2016 source
The sections ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles in detail’ and ‘FAIRness is a prerequisite for proper data management and data stewardship’ discuss the FAIR Principles and their implementation, but do not address the C.A.R.E. Principles or their intended adoption alongside FAIR. Searches for ‘C.A.R.E. Principles of Indigenous Data Governance’ and ‘Indigenous Data Governance international research and policy organizations’ found no passage addressing the claim. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe School for Advanced Research developed a set of Museum and Community Collaboration Guidelines in partnership with Native and non-Native museum professionals, cultural leaders, and artists.
“For example, the School for Advanced Research developed a set of Museum and Community Collaboration Guidelines in partnership with Native and non-Native museum professionals, cultural leaders, and artists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites The School for Advanced Research 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe Guidelines offer principles for building successful collaborations between Indigenous communities and museums.
“The Guidelines offer principles for building successful collaborations between Indigenous communities and museums.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites The School for Advanced Research 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationBy testing existing indicators of community health, the Swinomish Tribe identified which ones were most relevant to their communities and proposed alternatives to the ones that were less relevant.
“By testing existing indicators of community health, they identified which ones were most relevant to their communities and proposed alternatives to the ones that were less relevant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationAll data must be turned over to the Navajo Nation at the conclusion of the project.
“Further, all data must be turned over to the Navajo Nation at the conclusion of the project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Navajo Nation 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGuided by a board comprised of tribal leaders, the Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center uses Indigenous quantitative methodologies aligned with IDS to develop Indigenous data collection instruments, support Native nations in improving data used to make funding decisions, and serve as translators and intermediaries between community and non-Native partners.
“Guided by a board comprised of tribal leaders, the Center uses Indigenous quantitative methodologies aligned with IDS to develop Indigenous data collection instruments, support Native nations in improving data used to make funding decisions, and “serve as translators and intermediaries between community and non-Native partners” (Walter and Suina 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walter and Suina 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe Swinomish Tribe engaged in a formal partnership agreement with another Native nation, as well as with non-tribal researchers.
“In this case, the Swinomish tribe engaged in a formal partnership agreement with another Native nation, as well as with non-tribal researchers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe Urban Indian Health Institute (UIHI) actively partners with Native nations to decolonize data and improve health outcomes for American Indians and Alaska Natives living in metropolitan areas.
“The Urban Indian Health Institute (UIHI) is an organization that actively partners with Native nations to decolonize data and improve health outcomes for American Indians and Alaska Natives living in metropolitan areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UIHI 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationA core element of the NNHRRB's 12-step approval process is extensive engagement with community partners.
“A core element of the NNHRRB’s 12-step approval process is extensive engagement with community partners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Navajo Nation 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe Guidelines address important considerations such as following cultural protocols, being flexible, extending hospitality, ensuring appropriate compensation for expertise, and understanding that access to knowledge is not a universal right.
“Important considerations are addressed, such as following cultural protocols, being flexible, extending hospitality, ensuring appropriate compensation for expertise, and understanding that access to knowledge is not a universal right (The School for Advanced Research 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites The School for Advanced Research 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe National Congress of American Indians (2012) developed a guide for doing research in tribal communities entitled, "Walk Softly, Listen Carefully: Building Research Relationships with Tribal Communities."
“Similarly, the National Congress of American Indians (2012) developed a guide for doing research in tribal communities entitled, “Walk Softly, Listen Carefully: Building Research Relationships with Tribal Communities.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCAIPRC and MSUCNHP 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationUIHI's Data Dashboard uses national surveillance data to visualize health disparities across a range of indicators.
“UIHI’s Data Dashboard uses national surveillance data to visualize health disparities across a range of indicators (UIHI 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UIHI 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe software developed by the Pueblo of Laguna remains the property of the tribe and can be used for future data collections.
“Notably, the software remains the property of the tribe and can be used for future data collections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCAIPRC, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSimilar initiatives are underway elsewhere, and the First Nations Information Governance Center in Canada has been a leading voice for the right of Indigenous peoples in relation to their data for over two decades.
“Similar initiatives are underway elsewhere, and the First Nations Information Governance Center in Canada has been a leading voice for the right of Indigenous peoples in relation to their data for over two decades (http://fnigc.ca/).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites http://fnigc.ca/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe following year, Rodriguez-Lonebear was awarded an RDA Fellowship.
“The following year, Rodriguez-Lonebear was awarded an RDA Fellowship.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe USIDSN developed relationships with the RDA in 2016.
“The USIDSN developed relationships with the RDA in 2016.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSome Native nations have identified specific areas to advance internally within the tribe and deployed their resources accordingly, while other Native nations have chosen to partner with external Indigenous or non-Indigenous stakeholders to identify potential funding sources, develop their capacity, and build their IDG framework.
“Some Native nations have identified specific areas to advance internally within the tribe, and they have deployed their resources accordingly. Other Native nations have chosen to partner with external Indigenous or non-Indigenous stakeholders to identify potential funding sources, develop their capacity, and build their IDG framework.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe RDA IDS Group has convened at every RDA plenary since for a total of five RDA plenary sessions plus an International Data Week panel, which engaged over 100 participants.
“The group has convened at every RDA plenary since for a total of five RDA plenary sessions plus an International Data Week panel, which engaged over 100 participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCurrently three nation-state based Indigenous data sovereignty networks exist: Te Mana Raraunga, the Māori Data Sovereignty Network in Aotearoa/New Zealand formed in late 2015; the United States Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network (USIDSN) launched in early 2016; and the Maiam nayri Wingara Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Data Sovereignty Collective in Australia emerged in 2017.
“Currently three nation-state based Indigenous data sovereignty networks exist: Te Mana Raraunga, the Māori Data Sovereignty Network in Aotearoa/New Zealand (temanararaunga.maori.nz) formed in late 2015; co-authors Stephanie Russo Carroll and Desi Rodriguez-Lonebear launched the United States Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network (USIDSN; usindigenousdata.arizona.edu) in early 2016; and the Maiam nay”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe workshop participants drafted broad, international principles for the governance of Indigenous data.
“The workshop participants drafted broad, international principles for the governance of Indigenous data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenCarroll convened an invited IDS workshop at the RDA Plenary at International Data Week, Denver, Colorado in 2016.
“Carroll convened an invited IDS workshop at the RDA Plenary at International Data Week, Denver, Colorado in 2016.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn addition, the RDA IDS Group hosted a workshop at the RDA plenary at the International Data Week in Gaborne, Bostwana in late 2018.
“In addition, the RDA IDS Group hosted a workshop at the RDA plenary at the International Data Week in Gaborne, Bostwana in late 2018.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Swinomish Tribe's agreement and the decision-making processes and protocols that followed are effective governance mechanisms because both Native nations agreed that they retain complete ownership over their respective data and that data would not be used in analyses or released without prior review and approval by that tribe's leadership.
“This agreement and the decision-making processes and protocols that followed are effective governance mechanisms because both Native nations agreed that they retain complete ownership over their respective data and that data would not be used in analyses or released without prior review and approval by that tribe’s leadership.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTribal legislation and tribal research bodies influence governance of Indigenous data by controlling access to research about tribal peoples, resources, and cultures, as well as by controlling research taking place on tribal lands.
“They do so by controlling access to research about tribal peoples, resources, and cultures, as well as by controlling research taking place on tribal lands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningNaming tribes as co-authors in all related publications is a means by which tribes can exercise control over the dissemination of research findings on their terms in academic and scientific fora.
“which is another means by which tribes can exercise control over the dissemination of research findings on their terms in academic and scientific fora.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenNAGPRA took nearly twenty years to become law.
“yet NAGPRA took nearly twenty years to become law”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe international sharing of information and action around IDS is a critical pathway towards supporting IDG and decolonizing data.
“The international sharing of information and action around IDS is a critical pathway towards supporting IDG and decolonizing data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAs these case studies demonstrate, Native nations are working toward Indigenous data sovereignty at various paces by implementing mechanisms of Indigenous data governance.
“As these case studies demonstrate, Native nations are working toward Indigenous data sovereignty at various paces by implementing mechanisms of Indigenous data governance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningWithout investment in people and infrastructure, Indigenous data governance is unlikely to be fully realized.
“Without investment in people and infrastructure, Indigenous data governance is unlikely to be fully realized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe establishment of an Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group through the Research Data Alliance (RDA IDS Group) has provided a mechanism for in-person sharing, interaction with mainstream data users, and expansion to other global geographies, which has proven to be most effective in this context.
“The establishment of an Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group through the Research Data Alliance (RDA IDS Group; rd-alliance.org) has provided a mechanism for in-person sharing, interaction with mainstream data users, and expansion to other global geographies, which has proven to be most effective in this context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn this process, tribes are developing principles of IDG, research protocols, research review boards, data sharing agreements, and data repositories.
“In this process, tribes are developing principles of IDG, research protocols, research review boards, data sharing agreements, and data repositories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAs tribes grow their data systems and expand their reach to external entities, financial support and technical expertise become even more critical to the mission.
“As tribes grow their data systems and expand their reach to external entities, financial support and technical expertise become even more critical to the mission.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIndigenous data governance and Indigenous data sovereignty are integral to rebuilding strong Native Nations.
“Indigenous data governance and Indigenous data sovereignty are integral to rebuilding strong Native Nations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataRightsholders included tribes and Indigenous nations internationally; stakeholders included Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, policy makers, data users, tribal leaders, and community activists.
“Rightsholders included tribes and Indigenous nations internationally. Stakeholders included Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, policy makers, data users, tribal leaders, and community activists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe authors employed qualitative methods to analyze participant observation data from 27 gatherings in the United States and at RDA plenaries.
“Specifically, we employed qualitative methods to analyze participant observation data from 27 gatherings in the United States and at RDA plenaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataData included input on mechanisms for data governance, tribal data governance opportunities and challenges, and other stakeholders' roles in bolstering tribal data governance efforts.
“Data included input on mechanisms for data governance, tribal data governance opportunities and challenges, and other stakeholders’ roles in bolstering tribal data governance efforts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe following set of recommendations for the continued development of IDS and IDG is the product of two years of rightsholder and stakeholder engagement through the USIDSN and RDA.
“The following set of recommendations for the continued development of IDS and IDG is the product of two years of rightsholder and stakeholder engagement through the USIDSN and RDA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Every Indigenous nation has established cultural protocols around songs, stories, and ceremonies, regardless of whether those protocols have been codified into contemporary law.
“For example, every Indigenous nation has established cultural protocols around songs, stories, and ceremonies, regardless of whether those protocols have been codified into contemporary law.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Every Native nation engages with Indigenous data governance issues to some degree.
“Every Native nation engages with these issues to some degree”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no wrong place for a Native nation to begin or focus attention and resources in Indigenous data governance.
“and there is no wrong place to begin nor any wrong place to focus attention and resources.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI data stewardship applies this approach to dataset collection for training AI models, especially when these have knowledge gaps about marginalized communities.
“AI data stewardship applies this approach to dataset collection for training AI models, especially when these have knowledge gaps about marginalized communities (cf. [20, 59]).”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
The “Governance of Data” section supports stewardship of Indigenous data and warns that excluding Indigenous peoples from large datasets can make them invisible, while ungoverned inclusion can reproduce bias. It does not discuss collecting datasets to train AI models or establish that AI data stewardship applies this approach to marginalized communities generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Single-race AIAN share does not match the stated population totals
MinorThe stated 2.9 million single-race AIAN people are about 55.8% of the stated 5.2 million people reporting any AIAN heritage, not 49%.
Reported 49 · recomputed 55.769231
“Individuals that reported AIAN heritage alone, known as the single race AIAN population, comprised 2.9 million people (49% of those that reported any AIAN heritage).”
Cites
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423 · see citing works
The United Nations Development Programme
Oestreich, J. E. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190637347.003.0003 · Cited by 4,936 · see citing works
National Conference of State Legislatures
Clink, K. (2011) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/09504121111114072 · Cited by 2,321 · see citing works
Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1629175.1629210 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Indigenous data, indigenous methodologies and indigenous data sovereignty
Walter, M., & Suina, M. (2019) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1531228 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Genomic Research Through an Indigenous Lens: Understanding the Expectations
Garrison, N. A., Hudson, M. L., Ballantyne, L. L., Garba, I., Martinez, A. O., Taualii, M. M., Arbour, L. T., Caron, N. R., & Rainie, S. C. (2019) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015434 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Self-citationPeoplehood: A Model for the Extension of Sovereignty in American Indian Studies
Holm, T., Pearson, J. D., & Chavis, B. (2003) · Wicazo Sa Review · doi:10.1353/wic.2003.0004 · Cited by 188 · cited 1× · see citing works
“IDS aligns with the concept of peoplehood, which positions Indigenous peoples within a complex system of inter-relationships among sacred histories, ceremonial cycles, ancestral homelands, and continuously evolving cultural traditions and languages (Cajete 2000, Holm et al. 2003).”
BackgroundNational Congress of American Indians
Clink, K. (2017) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/rr-10-2016-0256 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Data sovereignty for indigenous peoples: current practice and future needs
Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016) · Indigenous Data Sovereignty · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.01 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Rainie, S. C., Schultz, J. L., Briggs, E., Riggs, P., & Palmanteer-Holder, N. L. (2017) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.1 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Data politics and Indigenous representation in Australian statistics
Walter, M. (2016) · ANU Press eBooks · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.05 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Donatuto, J., Grossman, E. E., Konovsky, J., Grossman, S., & Campbell, L. W. (2014) · Coastal Management · doi:10.1080/08920753.2014.923140 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
The voice of Indigenous data: Beyond the markers of disadvantage
Walter, M. (2018) · UTAS Research Repository · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Policing on American Indian Reservations
Wakeling, S., Jorgenson, M., & Michaelson, S. (2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e527932006-002 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Building a data revolution in Indian country
Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (2016) · Indigenous Data Sovereignty · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.14 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentifying Useful Approaches to the Governance of Indigenous Data
Bruhn, J. (2014) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2014.5.2.5 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Data and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Davis, M. (2016) · ANU Press eBooks · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.02 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Banerjee, S. B. (2003) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781403982292_11 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Governing data and data for governance: The everyday practice of Indigenous sovereignty.
Smith, D. (2016) · Indigenous Data Sovereignty · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.07 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Krepps, M. B., & Caves, R. E. (1994) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)90022-1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Policing On American Indian Reservations
Jorgensen, M., Wakeling, S., Michaelson, S., & Begay, M. (2004) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Lujan, C. C. (2014) · The American Indian Quarterly · doi:10.5250/amerindiquar.38.3.0319 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Exercising Sovereignty and Expanding Economic Opportunity Through Tribal Land Management
Edwards, K., Morris, P., & RedThunder, S. (2009) · Issue Lab (Candid) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 2007, Rebuilding Native nations, 1
- 2004, Case studies in tribal data collection and use
- 2007, Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledge, Eurozine, 33, 45
- 1995, Tribal water quality standards under the Clean Water Act: Protecting traditional cultural uses, Washington Law Review, 70, 177
- 2018, He Whare Hangarau Māori -Language, culture & technology, 62
- 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 79
- 2019, The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons, 300
- 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 253
- 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 253
- 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 79
- 2018, Miaim nayri Wingara Data Sovereignty Group and the Australian Indigenous Governance Institute
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., et al. (2020) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2020-043 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Self-citationOperationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures
Carroll, S. R., Herczog, E., Hudson, M., Russell, K., & Stall, S. (2021) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Self-citationHummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720982012 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Policy
Walter, M., Kukutai, T., Carroll, S. R., & Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (2020) · doi:10.4324/9780429273957 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Self-citationA framework for co-production of knowledge in the context of Arctic research
Yua, E., Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Daniel, R. A., & Behe, C. (2022) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-12960-270134 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Applying the ‘CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance’ to ecology and biodiversity research
Jennings, L. L., Anderson, T. G., Martinez, A. O., Sterling, R., David-Chavez, D., Garba, I., Hudson, M. L., Garrison, N. A., & Carroll, S. R. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02161-2 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review
Ross‐Hellauer, T., Reichmann, S., Cole, N. L., Fessl, A., Klebel, T., & Pontika, N. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211032 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Data: a contribution toward Indigenous Research Sovereignty
Hudson, M., Carroll, S. R., Anderson, J., Blackwater, D., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Cummins, J., David-Chavez, D., Fernandez, A., Garba, I., Hiraldo, D., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2023.1173805 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationCarroll, S. R., Garba, I., Plevel, R., Small-Rodriguez, D., Hiratsuka, V. Y., Hudson, M., & Garrison, N. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.823309 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationConceptualising fairness: three pillars for medical algorithms and health equity
Sikstrom, L., Maslej, M. M., Hui, K., Findlay, Z., Buchman, D. Z., & Hill, S. L. (2022) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100459 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Liboiron, M., Zahara, A., Hawkins, K., Crespo, C., Neves, B. D. M., Wareham-Hayes, V., Edinger, E., Muise, C., Walzak, M. J., Sarazen, R., et al. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146809 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Gstrein, O. J., & Beaulieu, A. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00497-4 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Data Co-Operatives through Data Sovereignty
Calzada, I. (2021) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities4030062 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Indigenous Peoples' Data During COVID-19: From External to Internal
Carroll, S. R., Akee, R., Chung, P., Cormack, D. M., Kukutai, T., Lovett, R. W., Suina, M., & Rowe, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2021.617895 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationIndigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance
Garba, I., Sterling, R., Plevel, R., Carson, W., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Cummins, J., Curley, C., David-Chavez, D., Fernandez, A., Hiraldo, D., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2023.1272318 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationArchaeology and Social Justice in Native America
Laluk, N. C., Montgomery, L. M., Tsosie, R., McCleave, C. D., Miron, R., Carroll, S. R., Aguilar, J., Thompson, A. B., Nelson, P. A., Sunseri, J. U., et al. (2022) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2022.59 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationBarriers and Considerations for Diagnosing Rare Diseases in Indigenous Populations
D’Angelo, C. S., Hermes, A., McMaster, C. R., Prichep, E., Richer, É., van der Westhuizen, F. H., Repetto, G. M., Mengchun, G., Malherbe, H. L., Reichardt, J. K. V., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2020.579924 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Ethics, New Colonialism, and Lidar Data: A Decade of Lidar in Maya Archaeology
Chase, A. S. Z., Chase, D. Z., & Chase, A. F. (2020) · Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology · doi:10.5334/jcaa.43 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Wilmer, H., Meadow, A., Brymer, A. B., Carroll, S., Ferguson, D., Garba, I., Greene, C., Owen, G., & Peck, D. E. (2021) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-021-01508-4 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationExtending the CARE Principles from tribal research policies to benefit sharing in genomic research
Carroll, S. R., Plevel, R., Jennings, L. L., Garba, I., Sterling, R., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Hiratsuka, V. Y., Hudson, M. L., & Garrison, N. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.1052620 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationData justice: social work and a more just future
Goldkind, L., Wolf, L., & LaMendola, W. F. (2021) · Journal of Community Practice · doi:10.1080/10705422.2021.1984354 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Kapayou, D., Herrighty, E. M., Hill, C. G., Camacho, V. C., Nair, A., Winham, D. M., & McDaniel, M. D. (2022) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-022-10336-z · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Perspectives on Citizen Science Data Quality
Downs, R. R., Ramapriyan, H. K., Peng, G., & Wei, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.615032 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Tsosie, K. S., Begay, R. L., Fox, K., & Garrison, N. A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.06.010 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Indigenous Peoples, Data, and the Coloniality of Surveillance
Cormack, D. M., & Kukutai, T. (2022) · Transforming communications · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_6 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
D’Ignazio, C., Cruxên, I. A., Val, H. S., Cuba, A. M., García-Montes, M., Fumega, S., Suresh, H., & So, W. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100530 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Cole, N. L., Reichmann, S., & Ross‐Hellauer, T. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.221460 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Duarte, M. E., Vigil-Hayes, Littletree, S., & Belarde-Lewis (2019) · Human Biology · doi:10.13110/humanbiology.91.3.03 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in oncology: From bench to clinic
Elkhader, J. A., & Elemento, O. (2021) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.04.013 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
David-Chavez, D., Gavin, M. C., Ortiz, N., Valdez, S., & Carroll, S. R. (2024) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-14768-290211 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationSmall‐Rodriguez, D., & Akee, R. (2021) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2021.306427 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A relational framework for microbiome research with Indigenous communities
Bader, A. C., Zuylen, E. M. V., Handsley‐Davis, M., Alegado, R. ʻ., Benezra, A., Pollet, R. M., Ehau‐Taumaunu, H., Weyrich, L. S., & Anderson, M. Z. (2023) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01471-2 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Data Governance in Health Research: A Systematic Review
Griffiths, K. E., Blain, J., Vajdic, C. M., & Jorm, L. R. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph181910318 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Robinson, C., Macdonald, J. M., Perry, J., Nadji, J., Nadji, S., McCartney, S., Taylor, A., Hunter, F., Cooper, D., Moyle, F., et al. (2022) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-13747-270436 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Reano, D. (2020) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4317 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Towards diverse representation and inclusion in soil science in the United States
Carter, T. L., Jennings, L. L., Pressler, Y., Gallo, A. C., Berhe, A. A., Marín-Spiotta, E., Shepard, C., Ghezzehei, T. A., & Vaughan, K. L. (2020) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.1002/saj2.20210 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Cannon, S. E., Moore, J. W., Adams, M. S., Degai, T. S., Griggs, E., Griggs, J., Marsden, T., Reid, A. J., Sainsbury, N. C., Stirling, K. M., et al. (2024) · FACETS · doi:10.1139/facets-2023-0135 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Governance of Indigenous data in open earth systems science
Jennings, L. L., Jones, K. D., Taitingfong, R. I., Martinez, A. O., David-Chavez, D., Alegado, R. ʻ., Tofighi-Niaki, A., Maldonado, J., Thomas, B., Dye, D. G., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53480-2 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationAI ethics and data governance in the geospatial domain of Digital Earth
Micheli, M., Gevaert, C. M., Carman, M., Craglia, M., Daemen, E., Ibrahim, R. E., Kotsev, A., Mohamed-Ghouse, Z. S., Schade, S., Schneider, I., et al. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221138767 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Arora, P. (2024) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2420041 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Morin, P. A., Alexander, A. M., Blaxter, M., Caballero, S. J., Fedrigo, O. D., Fontaine, M. C., Foote, A. D., Kuraku, S., Maloney, B., McCarthy, M. L., et al. (2020) · Marine Mammal Science · doi:10.1111/mms.12721 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review
Klebel, T., Traag, V., Grypari, I., Stoy, L., & Ross‐Hellauer, T. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.241248 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Trust in Scholarly Communications and Infrastructure: Indigenous Data Sovereignty
Ruckstuhl, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2021.752336 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The maternal health of American Indian and Alaska Native people: A scoping review
Burns, A., DeAtley, T., & Short, S. E. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115584 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Calzada, I. (2024) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi16100361 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Tran, T. M. A., Gagnon, V. S., & Schelly, C. (2024) · Forests Trees and Livelihoods · doi:10.1080/14728028.2024.2408725 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Sovereignty in the Digital Era: Rethinking Territoriality and Governance in Cyberspace
Pierucci, F. (2025) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-025-00189-4 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Reclaiming ʻĀina Health in Waimānalo
Keli‘iholokai, L., Keaulana, S., Antonio, M. C. K., Rogerson, I., Deitschman, K., Kamai, J. A., Albinio, L., Wilson, K., Kepa, D., Makua, K. L., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17145066 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Oliver, G., Cranefield, J., Lilley, S., & Lewellen, M. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24737 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Cross-cultural approaches to creative media content in the age of AI
Chateau, L., Arora, P., & Herman, L. M. (2025) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437251328188 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Alexiades, A. V., Haeffner, M., Reano, D., Janis, M., Black, J. L., Sonoda, K., Howard, M. A., Fiander, C., & Buck, M. (2021) · Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America · doi:10.1002/bes2.1924 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Living on the block: how equitable is tokenized equity?
Crandall, J. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231208455 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Data Management and the ‘BBNJ Standardized Batch Identifier’ Under the BBNJ Agreement
Lawson, C. G. R., Humphries, F., Jaspars, M., & Rabone, M. (2025) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72100-7_12 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Indigenous Fire Data Sovereignty: Applying Indigenous Data Sovereignty Principles to Fire Research
Adams, M. M. (2024) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire7070222 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Indigenous Peoples and the Justice40 Screening Tool: Lessons from EJSCREEN
Mullen, H., Whyte, K. P., & Holifield, R. (2023) · Environmental Justice · doi:10.1089/env.2022.0045 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships
Emmons, K. M., Mendez, S. R., Lee, R. M., Erani, D., Mascioli, L., Abreu, M., Adams, S., Daly, J. J., & Bierer, B. E. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115895 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Colonial Numbers: Quantification, Indigeneity, and the Politics of Fiscal Surveillance
Willmott, K. (2023) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v21i1.14609 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Empowering Equitable Data Use Partnerships and Indigenous Data Sovereignties Amid Pandemic Genomics
Haring, R. C., Blanchard, J. W., Korchmaros, J. D., Lund, J. R., Haozous, E. A., Raphaelito, J., Hudson, M. L., & Tsosie, K. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.742467 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Indigenous Peoples, Ethics, and Linguistic Data
Holton, G., Leonard, W. Y., & Pulsifer, P. (2022) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0008 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Sovereign genes: wildlife conservation, genetic preservation, and Indigenous data sovereignty
Robbins, P. F., Hunt, H. H., Pelegri, F. J., & Gilbert, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Conservation Science · doi:10.3389/fcosc.2023.1099562 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rhodes, K. L., Echo‐Hawk, A., Lewis, J., Cresci, V. L., Satter, D. E., & Dillard, D. A. (2023) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1177/00333549231199477 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Kjerland, T. M., Schroeder, S. M., Tofaeono, V., Walls, M. L., & Gone, J. P. (2024) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/14713012241233651 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Centering Relationality and CARE for Stewardship of Indigenous Research Data
Belarde‐Lewis, M., Littletree, S., Braine, I. R., Srader, K., Guerrero, N., & Palmer, C. L. (2024) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2024-032 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Case Report: Indigenous Sovereignty in a Pandemic: Tribal Codes in the United States as Preparedness
Hiraldo, D., James, K., & Carroll, S. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2021.617995 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationSEEDS of Indigenous Population Health Data Linkage
Rowe, R., Carroll, S. R., Healy, C., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Walker, J. D. (2021) · International Journal for Population Data Science · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1417 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationTaylor, J. E., Poleacovschi, C., & Perez, M. A. (2023) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-023-10063-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Resisting AI Solutionism: Where Do We Go From Here?
Reyes-Cruz, G., Spors, V., Muller, M. J., Felice, M. C., Bardzell, S., Williams, A., Hansson, K. E., & Feldfeber, I. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3706732 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Esquible, J., Hoffman, A., Lowrey, D., Ropati, D., Cleveland, J., Williams, M., Samuelson, J., Justin, W., Christiansen, F., Black, J., et al. (2024) · Arctic Science · doi:10.1139/as-2023-0039 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Rice, B. T., Rasmus, S., Onders, R., Thomas, T., Day, G. M., Wood, J., Britton, C., Hernandez‐Boussard, T., & Hiratsuka, V. Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1568886 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Genuine tribal and Indigenous representation in the United States
Brooks, J. J. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01420-0 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Doğan, A. L., & Wood, D. R. (2023) · ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) · doi:10.1145/3588001.3609368 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Co-Design Smart Disaster Management Systems with Indigenous Communities
Tsai, C.-H., Huang, C., Chen, Y., Zendejas, E., Krafka, S., & Zendejas, J. (2024) · Digital Government Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3660643 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Lee, M., Sumibcay, J. R. C., Cory, H. J., Duarte, C., & Planey, A. M. (2023) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.14167 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Cohen, A. K., & Snyder, R. E. (2024) · Community Health Equity Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/2752535x241262857 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Decolonial Social Work from an Indigenous Perspective
BlackDeer, A. A. (2023) · Springer series in international social work · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37712-9_2 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Aligning policy and practice to implement CARE with FAIR through Indigenous Peoples’ protocols
Taitingfong, R. I., Martinez, A. O., Hudson, M. L., Lovett, R. W., Maher, B., Prehn, J., Rowe, R., Boileau, K., Franks, A., Khan, S. F., et al. (2024) · Acta Borealia · doi:10.1080/08003831.2024.2410112 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationOtt, T., & Dabrock, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.902960 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Network Sovereignty: A Novel Metric and Its Application on Network Design
Janardhanan, S., Samonaki, M., Heegaard, P. E., Kellerer, W., & Machuca, C. M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2024.3434560 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Catalan Digital Republic: Between Nation Branding and Nation Building
González, A. J., & Garai-Artetxe, E. (2023) · Ethnopolitics · doi:10.1080/17449057.2023.2275883 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Albuquerque, U. P., Alves, R. R. N., & Júnior, W. S. F. (2025) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/s13002-025-00774-4 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Bringing Interdisciplinary Data Science Education Challenges into the Classroom
Bednarowska, Z., & Uprichard, E. (2025) · Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education · doi:10.1080/26939169.2025.2507366 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Calac, A. J., & Mackey, T. K. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01902-w · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Brewer, J. P., Black, J., Stevens, C., & Ancestors, G. (2023) · Environment and Planning F · doi:10.1177/26349825231163146 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Raphael, C., & Matsuoka, M. (2024) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520384347 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Boyd, T., Stipek, J., Kraft, A., Muskrat, J., Hallgren, K. A., Alexander, C., & Greenfield, B. L. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108661 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Stories as data: Indigenous research sovereignty and the “Intentional Fire” podcast
Murveit, A. M., Delphin, S., Domingues, C., Bourque, S., Faulstich, S. D., Garfin, G. M., Huntly, N. J., Meadow, A. M., & Preston, V. (2023) · Environment and Planning F · doi:10.1177/26349825221142293 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
State of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in the wildlife management profession
Werdel, T. J., Matarrita-Cascante, D., & Lucero, J. E. (2024) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.22579 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Affirming Indigenous data sovereignty in collaborative wildlife conservation in the era of open data
Tattersall, E. R., Cardinal‐McTeague, W. M., Myers‐Smith, I. H., Jenkins, D. A., & Burton, A. C. (2025) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.70161 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Teaching Ethnographic Methods: The State of the Art
Ruth, A., Mayfour, K., Hardin, J. A., Sangaramoorthy, T., Wutich, A., Bernard, H. R., Brewis, A., Beresford, M., SturtzSreetharan, C., Brayboy, B. M. J., et al. (2022) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/1938-3525-81.4.401 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Triplett, C., Fletcher, B. J., Taitingfong, R. I., Zhang, Y., Ali, T., Lucila Ohno-machado, A., & Bloss, C. S. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac038 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The benefits of Indigenous-led social science: a mindset for Arctic sustainability
Brooks, J. J., & Renick, H. E. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04127-6 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Systems in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR)
Chauke, M. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7964-6.ch015 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Making the most of existing data in conservation research
Binley, A. D., Vincent, J. G., Rytwinski, T., Soroye, P., & Bennett, J. (2023) · Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.pecon.2023.11.004 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Martinez, D. J., Meadow, A. M., Middleton, B. R., & Maldonado, J. (2024) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-23-0112.1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Quantitative Data in Ethnography With Asian Reflections
Roy, P. K., Chowdhury, J. S., Wahab, H. B. A., Saad, M. R. M., & Biswas, S. K. (2023) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9220-5.ch164 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Cadman, R., Snook, J., Broomfield, T., Goudie, J., Johnson, R., Watts, K., Dale, A., & Bailey, M. (2023) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.77450 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A Gramática Institucional da Proteção de Dados e da Privacidade no Brasil
Filgueiras, F. D. B., Lui, L., & Veloso, M. T. T. (2024) · Dados · doi:10.1590/dados.2025.68.1.346 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zuniga-Teran, A., Brown, A. R., & Gerlak, A. (2025) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2025.2463064 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Schmit, C. D., O’Connell, M. C., Shewbrooks, S., Abourezk, C., Cochlin, F. J., Doerr, M. J., & Kum, H. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/70983 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Indigenous Data Governance in Australia: Towards a National Framework
Rose, J. W. W., Langton, M., Smith, K., & Clinch, D. (2023) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2023.14.1.10987 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carroll, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Martinez, Andrew
- Venue
- Data Science Journal
- Publisher
- Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
- Published
- 2019-07-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31
- ISSN
- 1683-1470 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8580324
- OpenAlex
- W2955337378
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 15.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Data Science Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Data Science Journal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P50ES026089)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- Indigenous data governance, Indigenous data sovereignty, Native American tribes, tribal sovereignty, Research Data Alliance, data ownership, data systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review