Cited by 264Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsEthics and Social Impacts of AIIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations

Open access
Carroll, Stephanie Russo, Rodriguez-Lonebear, Desi, Martinez, Andrew·2019·Data Science Journal

Abstract

Data have become the new global currency, and a powerful force in making decisions and wielding power. As the world engages with open data, big data reuse, and data linkage, what do data-driven futures look like for communities plagued by data inequities? Indigenous data stakeholders and non-Indigenous allies have explored this question over the last three years in a series of meetings through the Research Data Alliance (RDA). Drawing on RDA and other gatherings, and a systematic scan of literature and practice, we consider possible answers to this question in the context of Indigenous peoples vis-á-vis two emerging concepts: Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous data governance. Specifically, we focus on the data challenges facing Native nations and the intersection of data, tribal sovereignty, and power. Indigenous data sovereignty is the right of each Native nation to govern the collection, ownership, and application of the tribe’s data. Native nations exercise Indigenous data sovereignty through the interrelated processes of Indigenous data governance and decolonizing data. This paper explores the implications of Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous data governance for Native nations and others. We argue for the repositioning of authority over Indigenous data back to Indigenous peoples. At the same time, we recognize that there are significant obstacles to rebuilding effective Indigenous data systems and the process will require resources, time, and partnerships among Native nations, other governments, and data agents.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper argues that Indigenous data sovereignty (IDS) is the inherent right of Native nations to govern the collection, ownership, and application of their data, exercised through Indigenous data governance (IDG) and decolonizing data. Drawing on Research Data Alliance meetings, a literature/practice scan, and US case studies, it recommends repositioning authority over Indigenous data to Indigenous peoples while acknowledging resource, capacity, and partnership obstacles.

Key findings

  • IDS is defined as the right of Indigenous peoples and tribes to govern collection, ownership, and application of their own data; IDG is “decision making” and “the power to decide how and when Indigenous data are gathered, analysed, accessed and used.” Native nations exercise IDS through interrelated processes of IDG and decolonizing data.
  • Data dependency is sustained by a paradox of scarcity and abundance: extensive data are collected about Indigenous peoples/nations but rarely by or for them. The 2010 US Census undercounted American Indian/Alaska Native peoples at 4.9%, the highest undercount of any racial/ethnic population; the Census also captures self-identification, not tribal citizenship.
  • Case studies show governance mechanisms: NCAI’s pilot with five tribes; Pueblo of Laguna ran its own census with proprietary software owned by the tribe; Swinomish climate initiative retained complete ownership and prior review/approval; Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board has regulated research since 1996 with a 12-step approval process and data turnover; NAGPRA repatriated nearly 60,000 human remains and over 1.7 million funerary objects, with penalties up to 12 months prison and $100,000 fine.
  • Recommendations emerged from 27 gatherings: tribal rightsholders must be involved in every recommendation, non-Indigenous entities also have roles, and the C.A.R.E. Principles (collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility, ethics) are intended alongside FAIR.

Methods

  • Conceptual/policy analysis combining definitions, case studies, and recommendations; draws on Research Data Alliance plenaries and other meetings and a systematic scan of literature and practice.
  • Qualitative analysis of participant observation data from 27 gatherings in the United States and at RDA plenaries, covering data governance mechanisms, tribal data governance opportunities/challenges, and stakeholder roles.
  • Case studies of tribal and non-tribal entities, including the NCAI Tribal Data Capacity Project with five tribes, Pueblo of Laguna, Swinomish Tribe, Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board, Urban Indian Health Institute, Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center, NCAI resolution KAN-18-011, and international IDS networks.

Limitations

  • The paper states its recommendations are not exhaustive, are nonlinear, and are not a step-by-step process; tribal rightsholders can decide their level of engagement based on cultural fit, vision, capacity, and resources.
  • The paper states there are significant obstacles to rebuilding effective Indigenous data systems, requiring resources, time, and partnerships among Native nations, other governments, and data agents.
  • Evident from the text: the analysis is largely US-focused with selected case studies and qualitative participant observation, rather than a systematic outcome evaluation; international examples are illustrative.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/dsj-2019-031

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 38 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    The sharing of ideas, actions, and best practices for reclaiming and decolonizing data is occurring in the United States and elsewhere, particularly in Canada and Australasia.

    “The sharing of ideas, actions, and best practices for reclaiming and decolonizing data is occurring in the United States and elsewhere, particularly in Canada and Australasia”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016 source

      The section “Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution” (page unavailable) describes US tribes developing data-sovereignty best practices and identifies Indigenous data governance in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. It does not establish that ideas and practices are already being shared across those places; instead, it says tribes still operate in silos and calls for international partnerships. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Rainie et al. 2017c

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kukutai and Taylor 2016 source
  • Findingcitation

    In 2014, the Swinomish Tribe engaged in a pilot study to evaluate climate change impacts along their shorelines and on the health of their people.

    “In 2014, the tribe engaged in a pilot study to evaluate climate change impacts along their shorelines and on the health of their people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
  • Findingreasoning

    The Swinomish Tribe and the other Native nation are named as co-authors in all related publications, as opposed to an individual tribal leader or staff member.

    “The tribes also are named as co-authors in all related publications (as opposed to an individual tribal leader or staff member)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
  • Findingcitation

    The NNHRRB has functioned to regulate, monitor, and control research within the Navajo Nation since 1996.

    “The Board has functioned to regulate, monitor, and control research within the Navajo Nation since 1996 (Navajo Nation 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Navajo Nation 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    The Swinomish Tribe examined key community health concerns and projected impacts to habitat and shoreline archaeological sites.

    “The tribe examined key community health concerns and projected impacts to habitat and shoreline archaeological sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Such sharing requires a degree of goodwill and buy-in, especially for Indigenous peoples for whom the 'sharing' of data often looks much more like 'taking'.

    “Such sharing requires a degree of goodwill and buy-in, especially for Indigenous peoples for whom the ‘sharing’ of data often looks much more like ‘taking” (Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    The C.A.R.E. Principles of Indigenous Data Governance (collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility, ethics) are intended for adoption and implementation by international research and policy organizations in addition to and alongside the FAIR Principles.

    “The C.A.R.E. Principles of Indigenous Data Governance (collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility, ethics) are intended for adoption and implementation by international research and policy organizations in addition to and alongside the FAIR Principles”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wilkinson et al. 2016 source

      The sections ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles in detail’ and ‘FAIRness is a prerequisite for proper data management and data stewardship’ discuss the FAIR Principles and their implementation, but do not address the C.A.R.E. Principles or their intended adoption alongside FAIR. Searches for ‘C.A.R.E. Principles of Indigenous Data Governance’ and ‘Indigenous Data Governance international research and policy organizations’ found no passage addressing the claim. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The School for Advanced Research developed a set of Museum and Community Collaboration Guidelines in partnership with Native and non-Native museum professionals, cultural leaders, and artists.

    “For example, the School for Advanced Research developed a set of Museum and Community Collaboration Guidelines in partnership with Native and non-Native museum professionals, cultural leaders, and artists.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites The School for Advanced Research 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The Guidelines offer principles for building successful collaborations between Indigenous communities and museums.

    “The Guidelines offer principles for building successful collaborations between Indigenous communities and museums.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites The School for Advanced Research 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    By testing existing indicators of community health, the Swinomish Tribe identified which ones were most relevant to their communities and proposed alternatives to the ones that were less relevant.

    “By testing existing indicators of community health, they identified which ones were most relevant to their communities and proposed alternatives to the ones that were less relevant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    All data must be turned over to the Navajo Nation at the conclusion of the project.

    “Further, all data must be turned over to the Navajo Nation at the conclusion of the project.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Navajo Nation 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Guided by a board comprised of tribal leaders, the Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center uses Indigenous quantitative methodologies aligned with IDS to develop Indigenous data collection instruments, support Native nations in improving data used to make funding decisions, and serve as translators and intermediaries between community and non-Native partners.

    “Guided by a board comprised of tribal leaders, the Center uses Indigenous quantitative methodologies aligned with IDS to develop Indigenous data collection instruments, support Native nations in improving data used to make funding decisions, and “serve as translators and intermediaries between community and non-Native partners” (Walter and Suina 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Walter and Suina 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Swinomish Tribe engaged in a formal partnership agreement with another Native nation, as well as with non-tribal researchers.

    “In this case, the Swinomish tribe engaged in a formal partnership agreement with another Native nation, as well as with non-tribal researchers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Swinomish Climate Change Initiative undated

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Donatuto et al. 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Urban Indian Health Institute (UIHI) actively partners with Native nations to decolonize data and improve health outcomes for American Indians and Alaska Natives living in metropolitan areas.

    “The Urban Indian Health Institute (UIHI) is an organization that actively partners with Native nations to decolonize data and improve health outcomes for American Indians and Alaska Natives living in metropolitan areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites UIHI 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    A core element of the NNHRRB's 12-step approval process is extensive engagement with community partners.

    “A core element of the NNHRRB’s 12-step approval process is extensive engagement with community partners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Navajo Nation 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Guidelines address important considerations such as following cultural protocols, being flexible, extending hospitality, ensuring appropriate compensation for expertise, and understanding that access to knowledge is not a universal right.

    “Important considerations are addressed, such as following cultural protocols, being flexible, extending hospitality, ensuring appropriate compensation for expertise, and understanding that access to knowledge is not a universal right (The School for Advanced Research 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites The School for Advanced Research 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The National Congress of American Indians (2012) developed a guide for doing research in tribal communities entitled, "Walk Softly, Listen Carefully: Building Research Relationships with Tribal Communities."

    “Similarly, the National Congress of American Indians (2012) developed a guide for doing research in tribal communities entitled, “Walk Softly, Listen Carefully: Building Research Relationships with Tribal Communities.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NCAIPRC and MSUCNHP 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    UIHI's Data Dashboard uses national surveillance data to visualize health disparities across a range of indicators.

    “UIHI’s Data Dashboard uses national surveillance data to visualize health disparities across a range of indicators (UIHI 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites UIHI 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The software developed by the Pueblo of Laguna remains the property of the tribe and can be used for future data collections.

    “Notably, the software remains the property of the tribe and can be used for future data collections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NCAIPRC, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Similar initiatives are underway elsewhere, and the First Nations Information Governance Center in Canada has been a leading voice for the right of Indigenous peoples in relation to their data for over two decades.

    “Similar initiatives are underway elsewhere, and the First Nations Information Governance Center in Canada has been a leading voice for the right of Indigenous peoples in relation to their data for over two decades (http://fnigc.ca/).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites http://fnigc.ca/

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The following year, Rodriguez-Lonebear was awarded an RDA Fellowship.

    “The following year, Rodriguez-Lonebear was awarded an RDA Fellowship.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The USIDSN developed relationships with the RDA in 2016.

    “The USIDSN developed relationships with the RDA in 2016.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Some Native nations have identified specific areas to advance internally within the tribe and deployed their resources accordingly, while other Native nations have chosen to partner with external Indigenous or non-Indigenous stakeholders to identify potential funding sources, develop their capacity, and build their IDG framework.

    “Some Native nations have identified specific areas to advance internally within the tribe, and they have deployed their resources accordingly. Other Native nations have chosen to partner with external Indigenous or non-Indigenous stakeholders to identify potential funding sources, develop their capacity, and build their IDG framework.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The RDA IDS Group has convened at every RDA plenary since for a total of five RDA plenary sessions plus an International Data Week panel, which engaged over 100 participants.

    “The group has convened at every RDA plenary since for a total of five RDA plenary sessions plus an International Data Week panel, which engaged over 100 participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Currently three nation-state based Indigenous data sovereignty networks exist: Te Mana Raraunga, the Māori Data Sovereignty Network in Aotearoa/New Zealand formed in late 2015; the United States Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network (USIDSN) launched in early 2016; and the Maiam nayri Wingara Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Data Sovereignty Collective in Australia emerged in 2017.

    “Currently three nation-state based Indigenous data sovereignty networks exist: Te Mana Raraunga, the Māori Data Sovereignty Network in Aotearoa/New Zealand (temanararaunga.maori.nz) formed in late 2015; co-authors Stephanie Russo Carroll and Desi Rodriguez-Lonebear launched the United States Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network (USIDSN; usindigenousdata.arizona.edu) in early 2016; and the Maiam nay”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The workshop participants drafted broad, international principles for the governance of Indigenous data.

    “The workshop participants drafted broad, international principles for the governance of Indigenous data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Carroll convened an invited IDS workshop at the RDA Plenary at International Data Week, Denver, Colorado in 2016.

    “Carroll convened an invited IDS workshop at the RDA Plenary at International Data Week, Denver, Colorado in 2016.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In addition, the RDA IDS Group hosted a workshop at the RDA plenary at the International Data Week in Gaborne, Bostwana in late 2018.

    “In addition, the RDA IDS Group hosted a workshop at the RDA plenary at the International Data Week in Gaborne, Bostwana in late 2018.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Swinomish Tribe's agreement and the decision-making processes and protocols that followed are effective governance mechanisms because both Native nations agreed that they retain complete ownership over their respective data and that data would not be used in analyses or released without prior review and approval by that tribe's leadership.

    “This agreement and the decision-making processes and protocols that followed are effective governance mechanisms because both Native nations agreed that they retain complete ownership over their respective data and that data would not be used in analyses or released without prior review and approval by that tribe’s leadership.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tribal legislation and tribal research bodies influence governance of Indigenous data by controlling access to research about tribal peoples, resources, and cultures, as well as by controlling research taking place on tribal lands.

    “They do so by controlling access to research about tribal peoples, resources, and cultures, as well as by controlling research taking place on tribal lands.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Naming tribes as co-authors in all related publications is a means by which tribes can exercise control over the dissemination of research findings on their terms in academic and scientific fora.

    “which is another means by which tribes can exercise control over the dissemination of research findings on their terms in academic and scientific fora.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    NAGPRA took nearly twenty years to become law.

    “yet NAGPRA took nearly twenty years to become law”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NAGPRA

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The international sharing of information and action around IDS is a critical pathway towards supporting IDG and decolonizing data.

    “The international sharing of information and action around IDS is a critical pathway towards supporting IDG and decolonizing data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As these case studies demonstrate, Native nations are working toward Indigenous data sovereignty at various paces by implementing mechanisms of Indigenous data governance.

    “As these case studies demonstrate, Native nations are working toward Indigenous data sovereignty at various paces by implementing mechanisms of Indigenous data governance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without investment in people and infrastructure, Indigenous data governance is unlikely to be fully realized.

    “Without investment in people and infrastructure, Indigenous data governance is unlikely to be fully realized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The establishment of an Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group through the Research Data Alliance (RDA IDS Group) has provided a mechanism for in-person sharing, interaction with mainstream data users, and expansion to other global geographies, which has proven to be most effective in this context.

    “The establishment of an Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group through the Research Data Alliance (RDA IDS Group; rd-alliance.org) has provided a mechanism for in-person sharing, interaction with mainstream data users, and expansion to other global geographies, which has proven to be most effective in this context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In this process, tribes are developing principles of IDG, research protocols, research review boards, data sharing agreements, and data repositories.

    “In this process, tribes are developing principles of IDG, research protocols, research review boards, data sharing agreements, and data repositories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    As tribes grow their data systems and expand their reach to external entities, financial support and technical expertise become even more critical to the mission.

    “As tribes grow their data systems and expand their reach to external entities, financial support and technical expertise become even more critical to the mission.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Indigenous data governance and Indigenous data sovereignty are integral to rebuilding strong Native Nations.

    “Indigenous data governance and Indigenous data sovereignty are integral to rebuilding strong Native Nations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Rightsholders included tribes and Indigenous nations internationally; stakeholders included Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, policy makers, data users, tribal leaders, and community activists.

    “Rightsholders included tribes and Indigenous nations internationally. Stakeholders included Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, policy makers, data users, tribal leaders, and community activists.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The authors employed qualitative methods to analyze participant observation data from 27 gatherings in the United States and at RDA plenaries.

    “Specifically, we employed qualitative methods to analyze participant observation data from 27 gatherings in the United States and at RDA plenaries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Data included input on mechanisms for data governance, tribal data governance opportunities and challenges, and other stakeholders' roles in bolstering tribal data governance efforts.

    “Data included input on mechanisms for data governance, tribal data governance opportunities and challenges, and other stakeholders’ roles in bolstering tribal data governance efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The following set of recommendations for the continued development of IDS and IDG is the product of two years of rightsholder and stakeholder engagement through the USIDSN and RDA.

    “The following set of recommendations for the continued development of IDS and IDG is the product of two years of rightsholder and stakeholder engagement through the USIDSN and RDA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Every Indigenous nation has established cultural protocols around songs, stories, and ceremonies, regardless of whether those protocols have been codified into contemporary law.

    “For example, every Indigenous nation has established cultural protocols around songs, stories, and ceremonies, regardless of whether those protocols have been codified into contemporary law.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Every Native nation engages with Indigenous data governance issues to some degree.

    “Every Native nation engages with these issues to some degree”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no wrong place for a Native nation to begin or focus attention and resources in Indigenous data governance.

    “and there is no wrong place to begin nor any wrong place to focus attention and resources.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI data stewardship applies this approach to dataset collection for training AI models, especially when these have knowledge gaps about marginalized communities.

    “AI data stewardship applies this approach to dataset collection for training AI models, especially when these have knowledge gaps about marginalized communities (cf. [20, 59]).”

    From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The “Governance of Data” section supports stewardship of Indigenous data and warns that excluding Indigenous peoples from large datasets can make them invisible, while ungoverned inclusion can reproduce bias. It does not discuss collecting datasets to train AI models or establish that AI data stewardship applies this approach to marginalized communities generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Single-race AIAN share does not match the stated population totals

    Minor

    The stated 2.9 million single-race AIAN people are about 55.8% of the stated 5.2 million people reporting any AIAN heritage, not 49%.

    Reported 49 · recomputed 55.769231

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 2007, Rebuilding Native nations, 1
  2. 2004, Case studies in tribal data collection and use
  3. 2007, Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledge, Eurozine, 33, 45
  4. 1995, Tribal water quality standards under the Clean Water Act: Protecting traditional cultural uses, Washington Law Review, 70, 177
  5. 2018, He Whare Hangarau Māori -Language, culture & technology, 62
  6. 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 79
  7. 2019, The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons, 300
  8. 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 253
  9. 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 253
  10. 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 79
  11. 2018, Miaim nayri Wingara Data Sovereignty Group and the Australian Indigenous Governance Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carroll, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Martinez, Andrew
Venue
Data Science Journal
Published
2019-07-08
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
31
ISSN
1683-1470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955337378
Cited by
264
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
15.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Data Science Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Science Journal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P50ES026089)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
Indigenous data governance, Indigenous data sovereignty, Native American tribes, tribal sovereignty, Research Data Alliance, data ownership, data systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review