The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tribal data sovereignty: Whakatōhea rights and interests
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, iwis (tribes) themselves have exerted control over the data about their peoples, environments, and businesses (Hudson, Farrar, & McLean, 2016).”
From Data as a Strategic Resource: Self-determination, Governance, and the Data Challenge for Indigenous Nations in the United States (2017) · cites this paper as Hudson, Farrar, & McLean, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Awatere S & Harmsworth G (2014). Nga Aroturukitanga tika mo nga Kaitiaki: Summary review of mātauranga Māori frameworks, approaches and culturally appropriate monitoring tools for freshwater monitoring and management, Client Report LC1774, Landcare Research, Lincoln, NZ.
- Boulton A, Hudson M, Ahuriri Driscoll A & Stewart A (2014). Enacting Kaitiakitanga: challenges and complexities in the governance and ownership of Rongoa research information. International Indigenous Policy Journal 5(2), doi:10.18584/iipj.2014.5.2.1. Business and Economic Research Limited (BERL) (2011a). The asset base, income, expenditure and GDP of the 2010 Māori economy, BERL, Wellington. Business and Economic Research Limited (BERL) (2011b). The Māori economy, science and innovation, BERL, Wellington. · DOI
- Gibbs M (2005). The right to development and indigenous peoples: lessons from New Zealand. World Development 33(8):1365-78.
- Haring RC, Hudson M, Erickson L, Taualii M & Freeman B (2015). First Nations, Māori, American Indians and native Hawaiians as sovereigns: EAP with indigenous nations within nations. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health 30(1-2):14-31, doi:10.1080/15555 240.2015.998969. · DOI
- Harmsworth G (2011). Māori perspectives on the science and innovation system. New Zealand Science Review 68(1):45-8.
- Hudson M, Collier K, Awatere S, Harmsworth G, Henry J, Quinn J, Death RG, Hamilton DP, Te Maru J, Watene-Rawiri E & Robb M (2016). Integrating indigenous knowledge into freshwater management: an Aotearoa/New Zealand case study. The International Journal of Science in Society 8(1)(March):1-14.
- Kukutai T & Walter M (2015). Recognition and indigenising official statistics: reflections from Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Statistical Journal of the IAOS (31):317-26.
- New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) (2014). Research impact evaluation: NZIER report to Nga Pae o te Maramatanga, NZIER, Wellington. New Zealand Press Association (NZPA) (2008). Govt signs $400 million- plus 'Treelords' deal. National Business Review, 25 June 2008, nbr.co.nz/article/govt-signs-400-million-plus-treelords-deal-32500.
- Schnarch B (2004). Ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: a critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health (January):80-95, naho.ca/jah/english/jah01_01/journal_p80-95.pdf.
- Smellie P (2014). Tainui assets top $1b as 20th anniversary of treaty settlement looms. National Business Review, 2 July 2014, nbr.co.nz/ article/tainui-assets-top-1bln-20th-anniversary-treaty-settlement- looms-bd-158582.
- Smith GH (1997). The development of Kau papa Māori: theory and praxis, PhD thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
- Walker R (2007). Opotiki Mai Tawhiti, Penguin Books, Auckland.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rainie, S. C., Schultz, J. L., Briggs, E., Riggs, P., & Palmanteer-Holder, N. L. (2017) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.1 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudson, M., Farrar, D., & McLean, L.
- Venue
- Indigenous Data Sovereignty
- Publisher
- ANU Press
- Published
- 2016-11-14
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
