The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyzing the Effects of AI Education Program based on AI Tools
Abstract
Purpose: In recent years, AI technology has emerged as a core technology for the fourth industrial revolution. Along with the existing SW education, it is time to prepare for AI education, since the interest in AI education is also growing. The fact that learning about the theory and principles of AI is important is also stressed in the college education. However, non-major students tend to perceive AI technology to be difficult, and hence, a more efficient AI education is required. The purpose of this research is to guide the learners direction for AI education, helping them to break away from their fears of AI through the AI education appropriate for the learners’ level. Method: In this study, to analyze the effect of the developed educational program on the learners’ AI literacy, the dependent variables changed before and after the application of the program were analyzed, and the single group’s ex ante and ex post testings were applied for the designing method for inferring the causal relationship. Results: The AI literacy of undergraduate students was analyzed for the educational program via the ex ante and ex posts testings of a single group by operating this program. As a result of the analysis, significant results were obtained where all three areas of the AI literacy were improved through the educational program Conclusion: This study is meaningful in that the AI educational program was proposed for the liberal arts class at college for the non-majors, and that the A…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, training gaps persist, especially in humanities (Laupichler et al., 2022; Lee, 2021), compounded by structural inequalities affecting access to AI knowledge.”
From A tridimensional model of AI literacy: An empirical analysis of student performance and demographic patterns in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Lee, 2021
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review
Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101 · Cited by 658
Enhancing artificial intelligence literacy through cross-cultural online workshops
Korte, S.-M., Cheung, W. M.-Y., Maasilta, M., Kong, S.-C., Keskitalo, P., Wang, L., Lau, C. M., Lee, J. C. K., & Gu, M. M. (2024) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100164 · Cited by 49
Medina-Gual, L., Medina-Velázquez, L., & Parejo, J.-L. (2025) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.10596 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, A.
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Aeri
- ORCID
- Lee, Aeri
- Venue
- J-Institute
- Publisher
- J-Institute
- Published
- 2021-06-30
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 21-29
- OpenAlex
- W3180817336
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, AI literacy, non-majors, liberal arts students, undergraduate students, AI tools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing the Effects of AI Education Program based on AI Tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22471/ai.2021.6.2.21
- The paper
- Lee, A. (2021). Analyzing the Effects of AI Education Program based on AI Tools. J-Institute. https://doi.org/10.22471/ai.2021.6.2.21