The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classification of Normal/Abnormal Heart Sound Recordings: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2016
Open accessAbstract
In the past few decades heart sound signals (i.e., phonocardiograms or PCGs) have been widely studied.Automated heart sound segmentation and classification techniques have the potential to screen for pathologies in a variety of clinical applications.However, comparative analyses of algorithms in the literature have been hindered by the lack of a large and open database of heart sound recordings.The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology (CinC) Challenge 2016 addresses this issue by assembling the largest public heart sound database, aggregated from eight sources obtained by seven independent research groups around the world.The database includes 4,430 recordings taken from 1,072 subjects, totalling 233,512 heart sounds collected from both healthy subjects and patients with a variety of conditions such as heart valve disease and coronary artery disease.These recordings were collected using heterogeneous equipment in both clinical and nonclinical (such as in-home visits).The length of recording varied from several seconds to several minutes.Additional data provided include subject demographics (age and gender), recording information (number per patient, body location, and length of recording), synchronously recorded signals (such as ECG), sampling frequency and sensor type used.Participants were asked to classify recordings as normal, abnormal, or not possible to evaluate (noisy/uncertain).The overall score for an entry was based on a weighted sensitivity and specificity score with respect to manual expert annotations.A brief description of a baseline classification method is provided, including a description of open source code, which has been provided in association with the Challenge.The open source code provided a score of 0.71 (Se=0.65 Sp=0.76).During the official phase of the competition, a total of 48 teams submitted 348 open source entries, with a highest score of 0.86 (Se=0.94Sp=0.78).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An open access database for the evaluation of heart sound algorithms
Liu, C., Springer, D., Li, Q., Moody, B., Juan, R. A., Chorro, F. J., Castells, F., Roig, J. M., Silva, I., Johnson, A. E. W., et al. (2016) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/37/12/2181 · Cited by 820
Self-citationApplications of Self-Supervised Learning to Biomedical Signals: A Survey
Pup, F. D., & Atzori, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3344531 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Clifford, G., Liu, C., Springer, D., Moody, B., Li, Q., Abad, R., Millet, J., Silva, I., Johnson, A., & Mark, R.
- Venue
- 2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)
- Publisher
- Computing in Cardiology
- Published
- 2016-09-14
- Volume
- 43
- ISSN
- 2325-887X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2592046076
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 78.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of Normal/Abnormal Heart Sound Recordings: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2016. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22489/cinc.2016.179-154
- The paper
- Clifford, G., Liu, C., Springer, D., Moody, B., Li, Q., Abad, R., Millet, J., Silva, I., Johnson, A., & Mark, R. (2016). Classification of Normal/Abnormal Heart Sound Recordings: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2016. 2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC). https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2016.179-154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.