The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein Embedding based Alignment
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1186/s12859-024-05699-5 · Paper page
Abstract
Despite of the many progresses with alignment algorithms, aligning divergent protein sequences including those sharing less than 20-35% pairwise identity (so called “twilight zone”) remains a difficult problem. Many alignment algorithms have been using substitution matrices since their creation in the 1970’s to generate alignments. These matrices however do not work well within the twilight zone. We developed PEbA for Protein Embedding based Alignments. Similar to the traditional Smith-Waterman algorithm, PEbA uses a dynamic programming algorithm but the matching score of amino acids is based on their embeddings from a protein language model. We tested PEbA on benchmark alignments and the results showed that PEbA greatly outperformed BLOSUM substitution matrix-based pairwise alignments, achieving different levels of improvements of the alignment quality for pairs of sequences with different levels of similarity (over five times as well for pairs of sequences with < 10% identity). We compared PEbA with embeddings generated by different protein language models (ProtT5 and ESM-2) and found that ProtT5-XL-U50 produced the most useful embeddings for aligning protein sequences. PEbA even outperformed DEDAL, a recently developed deep learning model that was created specifically for aligning protein sequences, particularly on longer alignments and sequences with low pairwise identity. Our results suggested that general purpose protein language models provide useful contextual information for accurate protein alignments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Iovino, B. G., & Ye, Y.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ye, Yuzhen
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-05-29
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-85
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10900708
- OpenAlex
- W4392235646
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI143254)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
- Keywords
- protein sequence alignment, twilight zone, protein embeddings, protein language models, substitution matrices, BLOSUM, ProtT5, ESM-2, dynamic programming alignment, low sequence identity, BAliBASE
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Boronic Acids, Proteins, Sequence Alignment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review