Cited by 6Fault Detection and Control SystemsControl Systems and IdentificationAdvanced Control Systems Optimization

An adaptive soft sensor deterioration evaluation and model updating method for time-varying chemical processes

Open access
Li, Longhao, Dai, Yongshou·2020·Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly

Abstract

Due to the time-varying nature of chemical processes, soft sensor models deteriorate, and data prediction accuracy decreases. To address this problem, an adaptive soft sensor modeling method is proposed that not only evaluates the model deterioration by an adaptive moving window-constrained statistical hypothesis test, but also adaptively updates the modeling samples using moving window-cosine similarity. First, this method evaluates the model deterioration via positioning by constrained statistical hypothesis testing based on the differences between the prediction performance evaluation index data obtained from moving window stepping and the original prediction performance evaluation indexes. Additionally, the dynamic temporal variation in chemical processes causes changes in the impacts of the auxiliary variables on the dominant variable, and this effect limits the improvement in the prediction accuracy of the soft sensor model by updating only the auxiliary variable data. The moving window-cosine similarity method is combined to propose a strategy that updates both the modeled auxiliary variables and the auxiliary variable data. Finally, the parameters of the soft sensor model are optimized via particle swarm optimization (PSO) to improve the fitting performance. Simulated data of a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and actual data from a debutanizer column process (DCP) are used for model verification to evaluate the performance of the proposed adaptive soft sensor modeling method, and the results show its effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2298/ciceq190419032l

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensor degradation weakens the correlation between sensor output and actual conditions, leading to reduced measurement reliability.

    “Consequently, it weakens the correlation between sensor output and actual conditions (Li, Price, Stott and Marshall, 2007) leading to reduced measurement reliability (Wanga, Al Atata, Ghaffaria, Leea and Xib, 2008;Li & Dai, 2020).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L., & Dai, Y.
Affiliations
China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
Venue
Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly
Published
2020
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
135-149
ISSN
  • 1451-9372 (ISSN-L)
  • 2217-7434
OpenAlex
W2980194699
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Keywords
adaptive soft sensor, model updating, particle swarm optimization, continuous stirred tank reactor, debutanizer column, process monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review