An adaptive soft sensor deterioration evaluation and model updating method for time-varying chemical processes
Open accessAbstract
Due to the time-varying nature of chemical processes, soft sensor models deteriorate, and data prediction accuracy decreases. To address this problem, an adaptive soft sensor modeling method is proposed that not only evaluates the model deterioration by an adaptive moving window-constrained statistical hypothesis test, but also adaptively updates the modeling samples using moving window-cosine similarity. First, this method evaluates the model deterioration via positioning by constrained statistical hypothesis testing based on the differences between the prediction performance evaluation index data obtained from moving window stepping and the original prediction performance evaluation indexes. Additionally, the dynamic temporal variation in chemical processes causes changes in the impacts of the auxiliary variables on the dominant variable, and this effect limits the improvement in the prediction accuracy of the soft sensor model by updating only the auxiliary variable data. The moving window-cosine similarity method is combined to propose a strategy that updates both the modeled auxiliary variables and the auxiliary variable data. Finally, the parameters of the soft sensor model are optimized via particle swarm optimization (PSO) to improve the fitting performance. Simulated data of a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and actual data from a debutanizer column process (DCP) are used for model verification to evaluate the performance of the proposed adaptive soft sensor modeling method, and the results show its effectiveness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensor degradation weakens the correlation between sensor output and actual conditions, leading to reduced measurement reliability.
“Consequently, it weakens the correlation between sensor output and actual conditions (Li, Price, Stott and Marshall, 2007) leading to reduced measurement reliability (Wanga, Al Atata, Ghaffaria, Leea and Xib, 2008;Li & Dai, 2020).”
From Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: (2025) · cites this paper as Li & Dai, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thai, T.-T. N., Do, P., Iung, B., & Gardoni, P. (2025) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2025.v16i4.4306 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, L., & Dai, Y.
- Affiliations
- China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
- Venue
- Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly
- Publisher
- National Library of Serbia
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-149
- ISSN
- 1451-9372 (ISSN-L)
- 2217-7434
- OpenAlex
- W2980194699
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- adaptive soft sensor, model updating, particle swarm optimization, continuous stirred tank reactor, debutanizer column, process monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review