The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Goodbye Washington Consensus, hello Washington confusion?: A review of the World Bank's 'Economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform'
Open accessAbstract
Proponents and critics alike agree that the policies spawned by the Washington Consensus have not produced the desired results. The debate now is not over whether the Washington Consensus is dead or alive, but over what will replace it. An important marker in this intellectual terrain is the World Bank's Economic Growth in the 1990s- Learning from a Decade of Reform (2005).With its emphasis on humility, policy diversity, selective and modest reforms, and experimentation, this is a rather extraordinary document demonstrating the extent to which the thinking of the development policy community has been transformed over the years. But there are other competing perspectives as well. One (trumpeted elsewhere in Washington) puts faith on extensive institutional reform, and another (exemplified by the U.N. Millennium Report) puts faith on foreign aid. Sorting intelligently among these diverse perspectives requires an explicitly diagnostic approach that recognizes that the binding constraints on growth differ from setting to setting. .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.6.3077 · Cited by 6,047
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1023/b:joeg.0000031425.72248.85 · Cited by 5,423
Self-citationAghion, P., & Durlauf, S. N. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4,447
Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1023/b:joeg.0000038933.16398.ed · Cited by 3,926
Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe
Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226317 · Cited by 2,578
Where did all the growth go? external shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses
Rodrik, D. (1999) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1023/a:1009863208706 · Cited by 1,869
Self-citationEconomic development as self-discovery
Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(03)00124-x · Cited by 1,840
Self-citationTropics, germs, and crops: How endowments influence economic development
Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2003) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3932(02)00200-3 · Cited by 1,727
Hausmann, R., Pritchett, L., & Rodrik, D. (2005) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1007/s10887-005-4712-0 · Cited by 1,317
Self-citationGood-bye financial repression, hello financial crash
Diaz-Alejandro, C. (1985) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3878(85)90036-7 · Cited by 1,150
Cited by
The Fundamental Institutions of China's Reforms and Development
Xu, C. (2011) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.49.4.1076 · Cited by 2,623
Towards an Elaborated Theory of Inclusive Development
Gupta, J., Pouw, N. R. M., & Ros-Tonen, M. A. F. (2015) · The European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/ejdr.2015.30 · Cited by 383
The Myth of the Beijing Consensus
Kennedy, S. (2010) · Journal of Contemporary China · doi:10.1080/10670561003666087 · Cited by 269
International organizations in a new era of populist nationalism
Copelovitch, M., & Pevehouse, J. C. W. (2019) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-019-09353-1 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodrik, D.
- Venue
- Panoeconomicus
- Publisher
- National Library of Serbia
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-156
- ISSN
- 1452-595X (ISSN-L)
- 2217-2386
- OpenAlex
- W2097480477
- Cited by
- 930
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 350.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goodbye Washington Consensus, hello Washington confusion?: A review of the World Bank's 'Economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform'. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2298/pan0802135r
- The paper
- Rodrik, D. (2008). Goodbye Washington Consensus, hello Washington confusion?: A review of the World Bank's 'Economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform'. Panoeconomicus. https://doi.org/10.2298/pan0802135r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.