Cited by 4Geotechnical Engineering and AnalysisLandslides and related hazardsTunneling and Rock Mechanics

Prediction of rock slope failure based on multiple machine learning algorithms

Open access
Mnzool, Mohammed·2024·Thermal Science

Abstract

Slope failures have the potential to seriously jeopardize access to sustainable development since they cause numerous casualties as well as disastrous effects on society and the economy. It is imperative to use precise operable computational designs in this case. This study examined the efficacy of five distinct machine learning models, namely support vector machines, decision trees, gradient boost machine learning, and random forest, in predicting the slope safety factors. This article?s primary goal is to assess and improve the different machine learning-based analytical representations in relation factor of safety computations. The genetic algorithm mimics the processes of growth, hybridization, and mutagenesis found in the expected collection and inherent procedures to resolve the hyperparameters of machine learning algorithms. A total of 217 cases were collected in order to train and evaluate these models. Multiple convergence analysis is also used to study the independence of individual characteristics. The assessed methods? competence was assessed through the application of diverse performance assessment indicators. The various classifiers function satisfactorily for slope failure inquiry, according to the evaluation and comparison of the data. Random forest was found to be the best classification method for slope failure prediction, with an accuracy of 91%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2298/tsci2406907m

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML models (including ANNs and support vector machines) are used to estimate soil parameters (such as shear strength and permeability) from accessible data (borehole logs, sensor readings), reducing the need for extensive laboratory tests.

    “ML models (including ANNs and support vector machines) are used to estimate soil parameters (such as shear strength and permeability) from accessible data (borehole logs, sensor readings), reducing the need for extensive laboratory testsand to predict phenomena such as rock slope failure (Mnzool, 2024).”

    From Artificial intelligence in civil engineering: emerging applications and opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as Mnzool, 2024

    The Discussion and Conclusion support the citing sentence’s point that machine-learning models, including an SVM, can predict slope failure; the Introduction also discusses neural networks for slope stability. The Slope stability analysis dataset section instead lists soil properties as inputs for predicting stability. It does not support estimating shear strength or permeability from borehole logs or sensor readings, or reducing laboratory tests. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ML models can predict phenomena such as rock slope failure.

    “ML models (including ANNs and support vector machines) are used to estimate soil parameters (such as shear strength and permeability) from accessible data (borehole logs, sensor readings), reducing the need for extensive laboratory testsand to predict phenomena such as rock slope failure (Mnzool, 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mnzool, M.
Affiliations
Taif University (SA)
Corresponding author
Mnzool, Mohammed
Venue
Thermal Science
Published
2024
Volume
28
Issue
6 Part B
Pages
4907-4916
ISSN
  • 0354-9836 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-7163
OpenAlex
W4406530599
Cited by
4
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Thermal Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Taif University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
Keywords
rock slope failure, slope stability, slope safety factor, failure prediction, random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machine, decision tree, genetic algorithm hyperparameter optimization, machine learning classifier comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review