The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Problem with Affordance
Abstract
This article reviews the concept of ‘affordance’, a term widely used in the literature on learning and technology to try and explain the properties technologies have. It is argued that the concept has drifted so far from its origins that it is now too ambiguous to be analytically valuable. In addition, it is suggested that its origins in ecological perception – where relatively primitive claims are made at the level of species about animal-object relationships, framed in an evolutionary timescale – have little direct relevance to the moment-to-moment interactions of an individual using a specific artefact. Because of this, it is proposed than an alternative way of talking about technology use is required. A stylistic analysis of technologies, drawing on Bakhtin's analysis of novels, is outlined as one potential alternative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Affordance, conventions, and design
Norman, D. A. (1999) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/301153.301168 · Cited by 2,040
Cited by
Bossetta, M. (2018) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699018763307 · Cited by 689
Context collapse: theorizing context collusions and collisions
Davis, J. L., & Jurgenson, N. (2014) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.888458 · Cited by 450
Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse
Costa, E. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818756290 · Cited by 328
Organizational Media Affordances: Operationalization and Associations with Media Use
Rice, R. E., Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Sivunen, A., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12273 · Cited by 284
What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies?
Bower, M., & Sturman, D. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.013 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, M.
- Venue
- E-Learning and Digital Media
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 402-413
- ISSN
- 1741-8887 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-7530
- OpenAlex
- W2103889189
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Problem with Affordance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.402
- The paper
- Oliver, M. (2005). The Problem with Affordance. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.