Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Online Academic-Integrity Mastery Training May Improve Students' Awareness of, and Attitudes Toward, Plagiarism

Curtis, Guy J., Gouldthorp, Bethanie, Thomas, Emma F., O'Brien, Geraldine M., Correia, Helen M.·2013·Psychology Learning & Teaching

Abstract

Some evidence has emerged in recent years that plagiarism can be reduced through the use of online mastery tests that are designed to train introductory psychology students in awareness of academic integrity and referencing conventions. Although these studies demonstrated a reduction in incidents of plagiarism they did not directly examine whether the use of mastery tests influenced students' attitudes toward or understanding of plagiarism. Consequently, the authors examined students' awareness of plagiarism and their perception of the seriousness of plagiarism before and after completing an online academic-integrity mastery module in a psychology course. Both students' awareness of plagiarism and their perception of the seriousness of plagiarism increased significantly from before to after completing the online academic-integrity training. Additionally, first-year students who completed the mastery modules showed better awareness of plagiarism and perceived plagiarism to be more serious as compared with a group of second-year students who had not completed the mastery modules in their first year. These results suggest that the use of academic-integrity mastery tests may improve students' awareness of, and attitudes toward, plagiarism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2304/plat.2013.12.3.282

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Ajzen I., 2005, Attitude, personality and behaviour
  2. 10.1080/00986280903173165 · DOI
  3. 10.1023/A:1018720728840 · DOI
  4. 10.21913/IJEI.v7i1.742 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/03075079512331381673 · DOI
  6. 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_3 · DOI
  7. 10.1348/014466604X23437 · DOI
  8. Maxwell A. J., 2006, Guidance & Counselling, 21, 210
  9. 10.21913/IJEI.v4i2.412 · DOI
  10. Myers D. G., 2010, Social psychology
  11. 10.1111/ajpy.12005 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/02602930301677 · DOI
  13. Teh E. C., 2013, Issues in Educational Research, 23, 283
  14. 10.1080/0729436980170105 · DOI
  15. 10.21913/IJEI.v8i2.811 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Curtis, G. J., Gouldthorp, B., Thomas, E. F., O'Brien, G. M., & Correia, H. M.
Affiliations
School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Australia
Venue
Psychology Learning & Teaching
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
282-289
ISSN
  • 1475-7257
  • 2057-3022
Cited by
54
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review