The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States
Abstract
The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States marked the beginning of the study of our postindustrial information society. Austrian-born economist Fritz Machlup had focused his research on the patent system, but he came to realize that patents were simply one part of a much bigger He then expanded the scope of his work to evaluate everything from stationery and typewriters to advertising to presidential addresses--anything that involved the activity of telling anyone anything. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States then revealed the new and startling shape of the U.S. economy. Machlup's cool appraisal of the data showed that the knowledge industry accounted for nearly 29 percent of the U.S. gross national product, and that 43 percent of the civilian labor force consisted of knowledge transmitters or full-time knowledge receivers. Indeed, the proportion of the labor force involved in the knowledge economy increased from 11 to 32 percent between 1900 and 1959--a monumental shift. Beyond documenting this revolution, Machlup founded the wholly new field of information economics. The transformation to a knowledge economy has resonated throughout the rest of the century, especially with the rise of the Internet. As two recent observers noted, Information goods--from movies and music to software code and stock quotes--have supplanted industrial goods as the key drivers of world markets. Continued study of this change and its effects is testament to Fritz Machlup's pioneering work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Olssen *, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680930500108718 · Cited by 2,388
Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037 · Cited by 1,922
The Burden of Knowledge and the “Death of the Renaissance Man”: Is Innovation Getting Harder?
JONES, B. F. (2009) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00531.x · Cited by 1,058
Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset
Glazer, R. (1991) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299105500401 · Cited by 989
Research, Patenting, and Technological Change
Kortum, S. S. (1997) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171741 · Cited by 916
Metadata
- Authors
- Fishlar, A., & Machlup, F.
- Venue
- Southern Economic Journal
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1964-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 372
- ISSN
- 0038-4038 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090348578
- Cited by
- 1,593
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 75.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1055322
- The paper
- Fishlar, A., & Machlup, F. (1964). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Southern Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1055322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.