The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy
Abstract
1. Economic Interests and Institutions I The Intellectual Problem II The Plan of the Book Part I Interests and Institutions 2. On Institutional Change: The Conventional Views I The Property-Rights View II Induced Institutional Change III The North Model of Institutional Change IV An Expanded View of Institutional Change 3. The Nature of Institutions I The Practice of Institutions II The Concept of Institutions III Institutions as Legal Relations IV Institutions and Markets: The Economy as a Set of Ordered Relations V The Normative Content of Institutions VI Individuals, Markets, and Coercion VII Summary 4. Preferences, Choices and Institutions I Preferences, Revealed and Otherwise II Preferences and Choices III Summary Part II Institutional Change 5. Institutional Transactions I The Economy and Institutional Change II Institutions and Efficiency, Again III On Efficiency and Optimality IV Institutional Transactions V Summary 6. Interests, Institutions, and the Framing of Choice I Missing Markets, Present-Valued Caims and Discounted Interests II Entitlements, Risk and Choices III Entitlements and Efficiency: Reallocating Economic Opportunity IV Language and Concepts: Productivity and Efficiency V Summary 7. Property Rights and Institutional Change I Concepts of Property in Economics II The Essence of Ownership III The Philosophical Case for Private Property IV The Practice of Property V Property Entitlements VI Summary Part III Institutions and Policy Analysis 8. Theory Science and Policy Science: Beyond Positivism I Beyond Positivism: Policy Science and Theory Science II Institutions and a New Research Philosophy III Summary 9. The Policy Problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to sub-Saharan Africa: A critical assessment
Platteau, J. (1996) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00578.x · Cited by 687
Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization
Paavola, J. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.026 · Cited by 578
Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Johansson, K. (2006) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9035-z · Cited by 503
Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.521047 · Cited by 417
Indigenous land rights in sub-Saharan Africa: Appropriation, security and investment demand
Sjaastad, E., & Bromley, D. W. (1997) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(96)00120-9 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sameuls, W. J., & Bromley, D. W.
- Venue
- Southern Economic Journal
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 576
- ISSN
- 0038-4038 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005565323
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1060651
- The paper
- Sameuls, W. J., & Bromley, D. W. (1990). Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy. Southern Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.